cattown
11 hours ago
Use cash. Get cash out at the ATM, keep it in your wallet. Spend it at local businesses. Even if you can’t do it all the time do it as much as you can. Start today and stick with it.
Otherwise this is what we’ll be stuck with everywhere all the time. There won’t be a choice anymore if you don’t exercise that right. We’re already far down this slippery slope.
idle_zealot
11 hours ago
And advocating for mass individual consistent behavioral change is less than useless. If you want change you need political organization. The sum of public opinion is more influenceable than the sum of everyone's actions. Unfortunately, in the US it's not so simple as "vote for the party that's against this" as we only have two and neither are. Which means if you want to be effective you should throw your lot in with an advocacy group. In this case probably the EFF, maybe the ACLU?
sequin
10 hours ago
Many people (not the EFF or ACLU, lol) saw it coming years ago and put in a monumental effort to try to turn to tide, only to be relentlessly repressed and dehumanized by bolsheviks and idiots.
idle_zealot
8 hours ago
I wish you would put content in your post. Who are you referring to, what monumental efforts, who repressed them, and how?
leninsghost
2 hours ago
Ah yes the Bolsheviks, famous for simping for big companies. It's funny how all the fake bull shit people think is happening in Communist China is actually going to happen in the EU and the United States in the next 10 years.
b59831
10 hours ago
[dead]
mmooss
4 hours ago
> advocating for mass individual consistent behavioral change is less than useless.
Again, the trend is to sound smart by saying it's hopeless. We behave much differently than prior generations in many ways. Heck, look at the rise of neo-right wing politics, the manosphere, YOLO investing, etc. Look at smoking, recycling, etc. Look at people using social media, when cell phones weren't universal for their parents
It doesn't require politics.
leptons
9 hours ago
>we only have two and neither are.
Both sides are not the same. One side wants to criminalize protests, the other side actually respond to protests. So vote for the side that will listen to protests.
Alex2037
8 hours ago
is that so?
it is still impossible to speak about such things here without getting flagged, so all I'm going to say is that I and many other people still remember the events that happened between February 2020 and March 2023.
idle_zealot
5 hours ago
They're not the same, but they are in agreement about expanding the surveillance state and cracking down on protests. They don't agree on which protests to crack down on, with the exception of anti-war or anti-genocide protests which both deem unacceptable.
obviouslynotme
8 hours ago
I completely agree with you, but you cannot stop this train. Cash will continue to exist only as a loophole to be exercised by rich and connected individuals. Everyone else will be robbed by police for having "suspicious amounts of cash."
hoppp
7 hours ago
Some countries almost completely cashless now. No escape from big brother
stronglikedan
8 hours ago
> Spend it at local businesses.
The ones that still take it, anyway.
mrdarkies
11 hours ago
cameras + machine learning trackable serialized bills
Almondsetat
11 hours ago
Yeah, people forget bills have a serial code, and if shops were required by law to validate them you could still mostly track all the money
calciphus
11 hours ago
Or if it was just valuable tracking data for them to have.
You don't need a law where there's profit incentives. Rewards programs track plenty.
obviouslynotme
8 hours ago
Cameras and other means of tracking cannot remove me from commerce. The problem isn't just the tracking. Cash requires no oversight to transact. If I am required to use a payment network, there are many third parties who get a say in what I can do. That's the biggest issue.
On the plus side, once cash is de facto outlawed, the US Supreme Court will be forced to finally step in on the subject. The removal of cash will force banks to authorize bank cards and accounts, no matter who. A bit later after that, they will be forced to give access everyone access to payment terminals and gateways.
29athrowaway
8 hours ago
A reason to use cash is that transaction fees (like CC fees), over time, tend to eat up all the original money being transacted.
On the other hand, cash is a germ superhighway.
hoppp
7 hours ago
Taking out cash from ATM has higher fees often than using the credit card to pay
jongjong
8 hours ago
How does clutching to colored pieces of paper solve any problem? IMO, it only reinforces the pathology which is the cause of many of our problems.
mmooss
4 hours ago
You can't be tracked.