It's finally here: Porsche puts wireless EV charging into production

35 pointsposted 10 hours ago
by cisc
(electrek.co)

34 Comments

cromka

8 hours ago

“and claims a charging rate of up to 11 kW and with an efficiency of about 90% for easy overnight charging.”

That’s a some 9kW lost on a 80kW battery. I get the convenience, but I think the best use for those would be when standardized and installed in public parking spots, for a brief charge bump, not to charge fully at home, e.g overnight, which is what Porsche aims for.

cisc

6 hours ago

> That’s a some 9kW lost on a 80kW battery

It's about the same as wired AC charging. There are always charging losses:

https://insideevs.com/features/711659/ev-charger-efficiency-...

onetwentythree

6 hours ago

The 90% efficiency of the wireless transmission would be on top of the efficiency of typical charging (which is mostly losses after the power reaches the vehicle).

cisc

6 hours ago

It's 90% from grid to battery.

1970-01-01

4 hours ago

It is not.

It is "up to 90%"

We all know what this means in reality.

unrented7977

3 hours ago

Do we? Because if you're invoking scare quotes, I don't think you have a good grasp on what's actually happening here.

90% is pretty good efficiency at this level of power. One cannot give an exact figure because it depends heavily on environmental factors, primarily temperature. 90% is pretty much exactly what I'd expect to see in the real world under same conditions.

beAbU

5 hours ago

> That’s a some 9kW lost on a 80kW battery.

*kWh

Using the right units is important.

solarkraft

5 hours ago

It will still be 90% efficient regardless of who uses it. In fact if it is used more, the total losses will be higher.

(Some of this becomes clearer when you have a feeling for the units: kW is a measurement of power, not energy)

helsinkiandrew

5 hours ago

> not to charge fully at home, e.g overnight, which is what Porsche aims for.

Wouldn't an overnight (usually cheaper) 10+ hour charge be a great use for (slow) 11 kW charging?

pornel

7 hours ago

Charging at home is already more convenient and quicker (in human time) than driving to a gas station, and now they're optimizing the 30 seconds it takes to plug the car in.

solarkraft

5 hours ago

We’re talking about a particularly inconvenient 30 seconds coming out of an expensive machine built entirely for convenience. Some people will want it and pay for it. If I was in the market, I probably would.

GuestFAUniverse

6 hours ago

I agree in so far that plug-in charging shouldn't be an issue for most people.

Yet I can see the advantages for someone with a disability.

And what a lot don't seem to understand: at 11kW we aren't talking about high charging efficiency anyway. Meaning, you cannot assume close to 100% for cable based charging and talk about how much 90% loose on a full battery (like others here do).

Avshalom

5 hours ago

They're optimizing the cable you can trip over/have to walk around/remember both at home and at, eventually, parking lots.

cyanydeez

2 hours ago

guys, guys. They're optimizing: people with a lot of money being nagged.

Welcome to capitalism.

kova12

6 hours ago

It's not just that; there's a new capability unlocked. You can now have self driving cars charge at remote places and come back without human interaction. Imagine you live in a place with no grid power

dpark

3 hours ago

I have a robot vacuum that manages to do automated direct contact charging just fine. I don’t understand why wireless would be any easier. It seems more complex and less safe than a direct wired connection.

I also have a lot of trouble believing in the scenario of a neighborhood that has an automated charging station for EVs but no grid. That seems like very misplaced priorities.

everforward

2 hours ago

Robo vacuum charging is almost inherently safe. They probably charge at something like 12V/2A. Voltage too low to penetrate skin, wattage too low to cause serious injury unless you’re really trying.

You can kind of just leave them exposed and live.

None of that applies to a 220V, 50A (or whatever amperage) charging. That can absolutely kill somebody; jet fuel may not melt steel beams, but 11,000W sure will.

You’d end up needing some kind of recess probably, and then getting cars to connect to it like planes refueling mid-flight is a nightmare. You could try some sort of USB-C like signaling before power is sent, but people are never going to enjoy “exposed 220V contacts that may or may not be live depending on if things malfunctioned”.

dpark

an hour ago

The point wasn’t that my robot vacuum is handling large current but that “moving device connects to power” is a solved problem. A car capable of driving itself onto this pad could as easily drive itself to a spot to plug in. Extendo-arm from the car could easily slot into an outlet in the floor. Or vice versa. Or a wall or pole.

Planes refueling mid flight is hardly an apt metaphor given the charging station isn’t moving at all and the car can move as slowly as needed.

beAbU

5 hours ago

How does wireless charging unlock this usecase? Robot arms exist?

brunoarueira

5 hours ago

I guess if you see the video on the linked post, you'll see what the usecase is unlocked. A neighboor city with a wireless charger station or a road wireless charger station can receive a self driving car above it, charge the car and with some kind of NFC do the payment and goes back.

dpark

3 hours ago

> the video on the linked post

The 3D rendered video of a car driving over the pad doesn’t really show anything unlocked. There are a lot of possible ways to build automated charging stations. This is not necessary tech for that scenario.

solarkraft

5 hours ago

This is a lot better maintainable than a robot arm.

kotaKat

7 hours ago

And the funny thing is China's already picked up the dropped torches elsewhere; Xiaomi's going to be launching a robotic arm for your garage by the end of this year to plug in for you. Tesla gave up on their charging tentacle, but, wellp.

https://carnewschina.com/2026/06/13/xiaomi-unveils-home-char...

quickthrowman

3 hours ago

Porsche’s induction charging strategy seems a lot smarter and much more reliable than a robot arm.

dpark

3 hours ago

I don’t know. I’ve stopped using my wireless phone charger because it’s spotty. Sometimes it charges. Sometimes it doesn’t (or barely charges). Sometimes it wakes me up at night because it’s glitching in between charging and noncharging states and my phone feels the need to beep and wake me up.

I’ve seen similar issues with multiple watch chargers. “Oh, it didn’t charge overnight again.”

I’m not as sold on wireless charging as I once was.

BoingBoomTschak

7 hours ago

Wall-E future here we come. Soon the people loader that lifts you from your sofa and plops you into the seat!

thejazzman

2 hours ago

I think of this / feel this way when I ride my onewheel instead of walking

ChiperSoft

an hour ago

I want to know what mechanisms the car provides to ensure you're lined up to the mat correctly. Seems like a small target to hit.

thenthenthen

2 hours ago

We already have several, see the Xiaomi SU7 lineup

1970-01-01

4 hours ago

This is something that isn't going to work for two practical reasons:

1. Losses remain very high for daily use.

2. Nobody is going to spend to install these propriety chargers except for millionaires that don't care about the costs.

This isn't a luxury charger; it is an exotic charger.

user

3 hours ago

[deleted]

metalman

7 hours ago

the imaculate lifestyle aproaches, but then in the way of reality, will then prove to be just out of reach, with some new more minor and tedious 'inconvienience' taking on the roll of 'proof' in bieng a victim.