alnwlsn
10 days ago
I could have sworn I remember hearing about some historical satellites involving wood in some way and I guess it was this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanhui_Shi_Weixing
>The successful recovery of an FSW-0 recoverable satellite in 1974 established China as the third nation to launch and recover a satellite
>A novel feature of the spacecraft's re-entry module was the use of impregnated oak, a natural material, as the ablative material for its heat shield.
Edit: There's more! As usual, Scott Manley has it covered https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtxYP9fLMmk
tucnak
9 days ago
If we're sharing Youtubers, I can recommend BPS Space video on ablation, which is a really cool, hands-on introduction to the subject backed up by experiment and actual manufacturing.
Tepix
9 days ago
That video doesn't seem to be about using wood in Satellites at all.
xerox13ster
9 days ago
That’s correct: it was stated to be about ablation.
That’s what I took from GP saying “I can recommend BPS Space video about ablation” followed by their opinion of the video.
I’m curious, what did you take from them saying “video about ablation” that made you think the video was about ‘wood in satellites’? How does one get from A to B here?
I want to be perfectly clear that I understand the thread we’re in right now is about wood and satellites. I want to TRY to understand how you read their comment so I can understand the confusion.
Tepix
9 days ago
It was about ablation of wood as a material. Not ablation in general. In a thread about using wood for satellites.
testaccount28
9 days ago
dude, what?
A: i'm really interested in things that are red. here's one: firetrucks.
B: here's a neat thing which is green: unripe tomatoes.
A: um, that's not red.
C (you): wow why would you possibly think that the thing was red? they explicitly stated it was green. not sure what comment you read.
do you understand how out of place B's comment was to begin with?Jarwain
9 days ago
I think B would be more accurate as "check this out: this one place has green firetrucks"
xerox13ster
9 days ago
I already stated that I understand the thread that we are in. I’m beginning to think that you don’t and didn’t read where I said that (as an attempt to head off this very reply), or the ggp comment itself, or the OP comment ggp replied to.
The whole thread is about space. The comment they replied to both shared a YouTube video and discussed ablations, so they brought a contribution to the thread: Here’s this interesting video from a space YouTuber in case anybody is curious about ablative materials in rocketry.
What did you bring to the conversation by remarking that the video that they shared was not about wood in satellites? They’d already said so; it was a Captain Obvious level response.
I have at least brought curiosity as to why you felt that was a meaningful contribution and how you could have arrived at such a dismissive statement from a place of curiosity.
I take it that despite being in a thread about wood being used as an ablative material for satellites, you have no curiosity about ablative materials in the devices that transport said satellites?
Did you think that they misunderstood what thread they were in? Their comment was relevant and welcome. Frankly, yours was against HN guidelines, and I was trying to politely draw attention to that fact by getting you to analyze your conclusion.
tyre
9 days ago
I know we’re not supposed to make comments that don’t contribute anything, but that’s really hckin cool.
* have mercy on me dang
antonvs
9 days ago
> that’s really hckin cool.
Not during reentry it’s not.