Spinning Up an Onion Mirror Is Stupid Easy

133 pointsposted 7 days ago
by speckx

49 Comments

crtasm

3 hours ago

>I have no interest in running a relay or exit node on my VPS, so I made some minimal changes to the config file

Noting the default configuration does not turn your server into a relay or exit node, in case anyone interprets this that way.

Thanks for offering a .onion, bookmarked for the caddy configuration.

qhwudbebd

7 hours ago

This has prompted me to look at how the Tor Project's Arti reimplementation is going. They've got way further along than I realised:

https://tpo.pages.torproject.net/core/arti/

https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/blob/main/CHAN...

Hosting onion services is apparently still a work-in-progress, though, and turned off by default.

yogorenapan

4 hours ago

I was already able to host onion services last year by using the crate directly. A few footguns related to flushing but it generally works as expected. I will however say that the code quality could be improved though. When trying to contribute, I found a lot of somewhat bad practices such as having direct file read/writes littered around without abstraction which made refactoring difficult (trying to add different storage/cache options such as in-memory only or encrypted)

cncjchsue7

4 hours ago

Opting not to over engineer the solution with abstractions nobody asked for until you came along is the definition of best practice. something not being designed for any and all use cases doesn't make something bad practice. Reading and writing from a filesystem you always expect to available is more than reasonable. Modular code for the sake of modularity is a recipe for fizz buzz enterprise edition.

embedding-shape

3 hours ago

> along is the definition of best practice

Not disagreeing or agreeing, but "best practice" is probably one of the concepts together with "clean code", that has as many definitions as there are programmers.

Most of the time, it depends, on context, on what else is going on in life, where the priorities lie and so on. Don't think anyone can claim for others what is or isn't "best practice" because we simply don't have enough context to know what they're basing their decisions on nor what they plan for the future.

maeln

6 hours ago

It is also very useful to expose services to the world wide web behind a restrictive network, Tor takes care of the Nat punching and all that jazz, and you get free dns and encryption as an extra bonus :)

dewey

8 hours ago

> I'm not sure if this is generally considered acceptable within the Tor network

Tor is already encrypted, that’s why you don’t need TLS. Some services (Like the hidden service from Facebook back in the days) have https but that was more of a vanity from what I remember.

Ajedi32

2 hours ago

Back when EV certificates were widely supported by browsers, HTTPS was a great way of cryptographically associating a .onion service with a real legal entity, for sites like Facebook which didn't care about being anonymous.

embedding-shape

3 hours ago

> have https but that was more of a vanity from what I remember

It has a functional difference as well, lots of new client-side features (like webcrypto) only work on "Secure Origins" which .onion isn't, but websites behind TLS are. So if you wanna deploy say something that encrypts/decrypts something client-side on .onion, you unfortunately need TLS today otherwise the APIs aren't available.

Of course browsers could fix this, but I don't think they have any incentives to do so. I guess Tor Browser could in fact fix this, and maybe they already do, but it'd be a patch on top of Firefox I think, something they probably want to do less off, not more.

crtasm

3 hours ago

My understanding is Tor Browser already treats .onion as a secure origin, could anyone confirm?

bauruine

2 hours ago

Yes it does but you can use Tor with other browsers too so it can make sense if you want to support them.

orbisvicis

4 hours ago

Without https can't the last relay snoop the traffic?

edit: oh, is the last relay the onion service? So the entire chain is encrypted?

rendx

2 hours ago

The key used to encrypt traffic is in the URL, everything including path is encrypted from client to the onion service end. What you are saying is true for non-onion HTTP sites, not for onions.

aspenmayer

7 hours ago

Proton also uses HTTPS for their onion site, and they used the same certificate provider as Facebook did for theirs, Digicert, per this page:

https://proton.me/blog/tor-encrypted-email

In the above blog post, they seem to imply that they made HTTPS mandatory for Proton Mail over Tor for security reasons.

adobrawy

4 hours ago

The best is to refer to official Tor project documentation for .onion over https: https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/advanced/htt...

tl;dr: Pressure from browsers, enterprise, and the overall ecosystem to use HTTPS (e.g., unavailability of advanced web features without HTTPS) is pushing for the use of HTTPS without exception, even for .onion sites with no significant technical advantage.

stephenlf

5 hours ago

What a pleasant read. Informative in all the right places without losing brevity. Thank you.

INTPenis

6 hours ago

It's not a mirror, it's a proxy. If someone encroaches on their free speach and shuts down their hosting account that "mirror" will not save them.

Just saying, this is an important distinction to me and I've been hosting tor nodes since the 2000s.

Archiving information, and making it available, is sometimes more powerful than anonymous proxying.

Especially if there's an anonymous proxy available to that archive. ;)

Retr0id

5 hours ago

As long as they have the private key they can move it to new hosting infrastructure without issue, and the same onion address will still be operational.

a022311

2 hours ago

"Mirroring" is a term also used when a single source publishes data in different mediums (technically in this case we're talking only about the internet but the internet is full of different protocols so I'll call them mediums). For example there are websites that mirror their content to Geminispace or in this case make it available as an onion service.

You are correct that this solution does not prevent problems if the server goes down. This particular approach aims to reach a larger audience, while your idea of mirroring enables resiliency.

Both approaches have their use cases and can even be combined too!

wartywhoa23

5 hours ago

> Oh, and free speech and anti-censorship and all that jazz.

That jazz is increasingly played by the same band of 185.220.0.0/16 exit nodes, and plays it in a scale which is all but Anonymian.

flotzam

3 hours ago

No part of hosting or visiting onion services involves exit nodes. Onion service traffic stays within the Tor network instead of exiting to the clearnet.

storm1er

4 hours ago

I would like to know more, can you give me some insight?

wartywhoa23

4 hours ago

Well if you use Tor somewhat regularly and check your exit node IP, it is about 50% possible that yours is in that subnet each time you renew the route. Which begs questions.

Maybe I'm wrong, but it would look more benign to have exit nodes distributed without this much bias towards that particular subnet.

bauruine

4 hours ago

It's only 185.220.100 [0] and 185.220.101 [1] that contain all those relays. Some of the bigger German families work together as "Stiftung Erneuerbare Freiheit" that's why you see a big cluster there. But Tor never uses relays in the same /16 for a circuit so it's not really an issue.

[0] https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/185.220.100 [1] https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/185.220.101

mo

2 hours ago

Correct. "Stiftung Erneuerbare Freiheit" acts as LIR in charge of the address space, handing out chunks of that space to exit relay operating non-profits for free, but does not operate any Tor infrastructure themselves and has no visibility into the traffic. The cost for us are the RIPE membership fees (approx 2000€/yr).

Source: I'm its director and founder of torservers.net. Usually using a different nick here.

immibis

an hour ago

Run more exit nodes then, and more onion services so they don't need to involve exit nodes.

It's also not such a big deal, provided they aren't messing with your exit traffic which you did encrypt, right? There are few exit nodes, but a great many non-exit nodes which still help anonymize your traffic. If you think it's a problem though, run an exit node.

simonmales

8 hours ago

This is a good reminder for myself to get some onion addresses for my sites and spread awareness of Tor.

TIL that Onion-Location is a header, only new about the <meta> element.

  <meta http-equiv="onion-location" content="http://<your-onion-service-address>.onion" />

CGamesPlay

7 hours ago

The "http-equiv" in that meta tag means "equivalent HTTP header", FYI.

hshdhdhehd

5 hours ago

Anyone comment on the http thing? Does Tor layer security in that anyway so "Saul Goodman" or is there anything more needed here?

mzajc

5 hours ago

The onion address is the certificate, albeit not one that expires or can be revoked. As long as you get it from a trusted source, you should be good.

blueflow

5 hours ago

Without having a trustable certificate, the connection can be MITM'ed anyways. Anyone can produce a self-signed cert on demand.

immibis

an hour ago

Onion addresses are unforgeable and traffic is encrypted. http over .onion is comparable to http over tls.

badmoddingyo

7 hours ago

Whats not easy is dealing with harassment from the law as a result.

phaer

7 hours ago

Very unlikely if you just hosting an onion service with legal content, where all traffic is encrypted.

Having to deal with law enforcement is unlikely even if you run a normal, encrypted, TOR relay.

Exit nodes, on the other hand, will most likely get letters or even visits by law enforcement. But those are not involved at all when just running an onion service.

jandrese

an hour ago

There is one form of harassment though, if you run even just a TOR Relay you tend to be put on realtime blackhole lists regularly which will cause random websites to refuse your connection. Things like banks, ticket sites, even your insurance company might suddenly block your connection because your IP is listed as "Exterme Risk, active threats, verified" on one of like 200 RBL sites because someone scraped TOR and put all of the IP addresses they found on there and tagged them as active threats.

TOMDM

6 hours ago

It does make me wonder if people are running very boring polite websites that can suddenly do very not boring or polite things if you know how to ask the right way over an onion address.

Surely I can't be the only one to think of this right?

bauruine

4 hours ago

Tor does this sort of although not like you think. It's used as a bridge transport.

>https://blog.torproject.org/introducing-webtunnel-evading-ce...

>WebTunnel is a censorship-resistant pluggable transport designed to mimic encrypted web traffic (HTTPS) inspired by HTTPT. It works by wrapping the payload connection into a WebSocket-like HTTPS connection, appearing to network observers as an ordinary HTTPS (WebSocket) connection. So, for an onlooker without the knowledge of the hidden path, it just looks like a regular HTTP connection to a webpage server giving the impression that the user is simply browsing the web.

throawayonthe

6 hours ago

that seems unwise, you'd be associating your 'impolite' activities with an irl legal identity

tux1968

4 hours ago

Well, you could use a disposable legal identity. Say a hobby site, about bowling.

theshrike79

6 hours ago

Which is funny when anecdotal evidence says that over 50% of existing tor relays are controlled by US TLAs :)

mo

an hour ago

Anecdotally, I used to be in control of more than half of Tors exit capacity (until I had inspired enough other people to take over), with no association to US TLAs, and I personally know many exit and other relay operators. I have no reason to assume they are affiliated with US TLAs or other TLAs. The majority in terms of numbers may be, but not the majority in terms of bandwidth.

Personally, I doubt the US TLAs have a need to operate any relays themselves. They can simply wiretap, and use control flow data for correlation when necessary. Tor can still be useful for all those who do not try to hide from the few agencies who may have this kind of visibility.

The relay community is pretty good in terms of interacting with each other. There are real-world meetings to get to know others in the space, which may make you also more comfortable seeing their personal reasons for providing bandwidth.

ktallett

8 hours ago

I am of the view having a .gopher and .onion version of sites is important for avoiding government blocking where possible and to keep information as free as possible.

szszrk

6 hours ago

can you recommend some gopher server that is actively maintained? I always wanted to host gopher site but could not find a strong solution that I will not be afraid to be easily compromised.

deadbabe

3 hours ago

What’s a better place for hosting a .onion, Panaman or Switzerland?

Bender

an hour ago

Anywhere and on just about anything. The only time a location would be of concern would be on Tor Exit nodes which is not what they are discussing.