mbirth
5 months ago
There seems to be a playlist on YouTube with slightly better quality: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYn090EvNBcinpVcrKNmY...
*EDIT:* There's also the CD version somewhere out there. Here's a Reddit post where someone ripped it (but didn't make it available): https://www.reddit.com/r/Neuromancer/comments/1gr7k4n/audiob...
IlikeKitties
5 months ago
There was a wetransfer link but that expired. Has anyone got a torrent for the CD Version? Or perhaps a reddit acount to contact that OP to get another download for it? If you can make it available i can seed it indefinetly
acuozzo
5 months ago
I have the CD version, but I stupidly re-encoded it to something like 256kbps CBR MP3 back in 2012. Still, the fidelity is far greater than what was shared here.
I can uploaded it somewhere if you'd like.
Edit: Here you go: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MvEQd-V3Ma86XMnQYpCa...
Please share this far & wide. I have a busy night ahead of me or I'd take the time to upload it to IA.
NKosmatos
5 months ago
That's why like-minded HN users are here ;-)
I uploaded your MP3s to Internet Archive for all to enjoy: https://archive.org/details/william-gibson-neuromancer-abrid...
acuozzo
5 months ago
Thank you!!!
Can you please edit the metadata to mention that it's from the CD?
mapontosevenths
5 months ago
The CD set is ISBN 1-57042-156-0. There are two available on ebay, one at ~$2,500 USD and the other (in worse shape) for $450.
I think the mp3 might have to do for now. :) Thanks for sharing.
acuozzo
5 months ago
You're very welcome! Please pass it along.
mapontosevenths
5 months ago
I managed to snag a set of the CD's. I'll post the FLAC files once they arrive and I can rip them.
acuozzo
5 months ago
YES!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!
mapontosevenths
5 months ago
Not sure if anyone will see this - but I ripped the CD's at level 5 flac. Hopefully the share works. I haven't used limewire.com for this before.
Normally I wouldn't do this, but there's no way other reasonable way to acquire them now.
gits1225
4 months ago
Thanks!
pdntspa
5 months ago
256kbit CBR MP3 is pretty good for spoken word material
acuozzo
5 months ago
Agreed. With that being said, I meant that it was a stupid move from an archival POV.
pdntspa
5 months ago
Is it though? Voice consumes so much less sonic bandwidth than music. I imagine the codec places extra emphasis on faithfully reproducing voices, since our brains are so wired to perceive them. A 256kbps spoken word recording is going to be a lot higher quality, comparatively, than a musical recording.
acuozzo
5 months ago
I meant "archival" in an absolute/save-all-the-exact-bits sense.
For whatever reason, if someone were interested in knowing exactly which bits were on the CDs, my copy wouldn't suffice.
Trust me, I know I wouldn't be able to hear the difference in an ABX test.
sneak
5 months ago
Nah. Even at 128kbps for voice mp3 is completely transparent. Try an ABX sometime.
acuozzo
5 months ago
I meant "archival" in an absolute/save-all-the-exact-bits sense.
Trust me, I know very well that I would not be able to hear the difference in an ABX test, even with incredible equipment.
LiquidSky
5 months ago
Thank you!
ElijahLynn
5 months ago
thanks, the OP is of lesser quality compared to this one.
amatecha
5 months ago
Yeah, I took a quick listen to OP -- unfortunately their mp3s are of very poor quality. I heard numerous glitches while listening :(
muricula
5 months ago
I think the audio quality gives this recording character. What could be more cyberpunk than hearing the quirky artifacts resulting from ripping an obsolete recording medium?
amatecha
5 months ago
No I know but I mean it has actual mp3 encoding errors because the files are getting corrupted over time lol, like it's an issue in the storage medium not the original analog-to-digital conversion :(
Examples in the following file http://bearcave.com/bookrev/neuromancer/Tape1a.mp3 :
0:40, 1:04, 1:13, 1:21, 2:18 ... I mean.. the files are basically ruined :\
kevin_thibedeau
5 months ago
A little embarrassing when the 1970s technology is better than the 1990s.
robotresearcher
5 months ago
‘Worse is better’ in effect. MP3 trades quality for convenience.
Edit: I read above that these particular MP3s are corrupted, so they have a serious enjoyability issue.
kevin_thibedeau
5 months ago
That's the point. CDs have error correction to handle corruption. MP3 has nothing. A complete downgrade in robustness.
robotresearcher
5 months ago
With an advantage in compactness that makes them easier to distribute. That trade off is their point.
kevin_thibedeau
5 months ago
That wasn't the MPEG design goal. It was to stream video through a distribution network where dropouts would be tolerated as part of doing business. People were accustomed to snowy analog broadcast video. That is more disruptive when listening to purely audio. This is incidentally why CDs had their error handling significantly improved over Phillips' original prototype which would have been much more susceptible to scratches if commercialized.
jszymborski
5 months ago
I was about to say, feels more of its time...
FrustratedMonky
5 months ago
In the article there is link to William Gibson, "No Maps for these Territories". That is broken. Is that somewhere else also?
nervousvarun
5 months ago
Giblophile so encountered this years ago...definitely worth a watch.