Ask HN: Jaded with AI – Alternatives?

9 pointsposted a day ago
by career_question

Item id: 43908882

6 Comments

throwup238

a day ago

First the good news: There is a relatively well beaten path to becoming an independent consultant/contractor who gets to pick and chose their clients and projects. You probably won't work on intellectually challenging or stimulating projects 100% of the time, but you can schedule them so that there's usually an interesting contract running in parallel to the ones that reliably pay the bills. There will be dry spells where you have nothing but boring work but as you get better and have a proven history of delivering, that work improves.

Now the bad news: getting there takes a lot of work - most of it unrelated to technology - and requires a certain personality. You need to get out there and network till your ears bleed, get good at sales and marketing, manage the stress of not having a W2 salary and health insurance, learn how to bill clients and convince them to actually pay, maintain relationships with current and past coworkers, and a hundred other yaks you have to shave. It's death by a thousand cuts but if this lifestyle fits your personality, you can achieve a very interesting and varied career.

If you spend your college years and summers building out that network, you can even start this process shortly after graduation but it is very risky. Depending on how the job market looks in a couple years, it might even be the optimal thing to do (it's what I did after the 2008 GFC), but this is not a path for the feint of heart. It is hard and much more stressful than collecting a paycheck. I was personally relieved to get a FTE position after years of consulting.

Thanks! While I appreciate this type of role, for family reasons, near-complete job security is a must for me, so this option is likely not suitable for me. On top of that, I'm also very much a risk-averse person and don't think would be able to survive the pressure that naturally accompanies freelancing or contracting.

n3t

20 hours ago

> near-complete job security is a must for me

Unless we understand vastly different things by "job security", I have some bad news for you.

Recent years showed that even large, profitable companies with significant cash reserves -- that had a reputation of high level of job security -- are ready to do layoffs as a sacrifice to the gods of Wall Street.

career_question

8 hours ago

I guess _relative_ job security is what I'm hoping for. I realize there are few career paths that guarantee employment (perhaps medicine being the main exception), but despite the FAANG layoffs and whatnot, wouldn't it still be correct to say working at a somewhat well-established company is safer than working independently?

ActorNightly

a day ago

>I'm getting the impression that the field is over-saturated, with new research being published on a daily basis

The research being published is mostly about optimizations of transformer models.

There is a lot more research in other areas. For example, everyone seemed to forget about MuZero, but that was one of the most important breakthroughs in the last decade, because it was a model that could recursively search.

So if you think about tasks like driving a car, a model that can predict the evolution of a physical system (much like MuZero can predict the evolution of the game board), and make a decision, is going to perform much better than any of the vision based transformer models that are in cars today.

But there are other areas of research as well, namely in hardware with specific instructions for general compute.

I see your point - where I formerly worked, computer vision relied as heavily on more traditional CNNs as it did on more cutting-edge architectures. Yet, due to all the excitement over transformers et al., I've inadvertently lost interest in other areas of deep learning because of how overshadowed they feel.