Finland, Sweden complete repairs on Baltic Sea cables

80 pointsposted 9 hours ago
by Hamuko

97 Comments

willvarfar

8 hours ago

Sweden has just asked China to cooperate in the investigation.

Its not clear what form exactly this will take, or what has been asked, but I could guess that they've asked that the ship sail into Swedish territorial waters.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c748210k82wo

InDubioProRubio

8 hours ago

The only thing certain is that faced will be saved.

ktsaver

8 hours ago

The article cites Russian involvement again, followed by mentioning the Yi Peng 3 anchor-dragging accusations.

It seems unlikely that the Chinese would get involved at the behest of the Russians. Russia depends on China now and not vice versa.

We see right now what an actual Russian retaliation for ATACMS strikes looks like: Oreshnik, taking out energy infrastructure in Ukraine, etc. Certainly the visual effects of Oreshnik were greater than a cable cut that just reduces gamer latency in Finland for a couple of days.

willvarfar

8 hours ago

One plausible explanation is straightforward corruption. The captain was paid to do this. Its easy to imagine him being approached when in port in Russia. And he was prepared to do it in part because of feeling secure in being Chinese flagged so there would be no repercussions.

dmix

7 hours ago

Russian ships got away with doing the anchor drag sabotage multiple times already such as in Norway in 2021 on a remote research station https://youtu.be/pw2lO4sxZn8

There was a NYTimes article that said Russian GRU agency has turned to recruiting petty criminals to do arson and shootings across Europe because most of their spies have been kicked out. And the main side effect is they are sloppy and easy to catch unlike professionals.

Very likely in this case.

dandanua

7 hours ago

It's much easier and cheaper to support criminals and criminal organizations in western countries to sow division and destruction, instead of installing their own networks. Hell, they managed to get criminal elected in USA, for a second time. I wonder when the west stop sleeping and start doing something about it. Or is everyone waiting for real nuke strikes and fallout, like in the Hollywood movies?

willvarfar

7 hours ago

There is nothing particularly new about today's modern politics. Here is a rant by George Carlin from 1988 about a previous government nearly 40 years ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og9DV0Si8bs

You can pretty much find-replace terms to closely match what we imagine George would say in 2028.

So nothing really changes, and the broad general positions of the parties doesn't really change. People just have short memories.

SiempreViernes

7 hours ago

Honestly, I'm not finding it very easy to imagine a Chinese captain speaking Russian, nor that said captain would think its perfectly normal to encounter a Chinese speaking Russian.

And what is the pitch? "Hey, how about committing a very visible crime you will get caught doing and will risk your ability to ever captain again?" Oh yes, very enticing.

quadhome

5 hours ago

The pitch is dubious, but China and Russia share a border. Chinese speaking Russians and Russian speaking Chinese are a dime a dozen.

lyu07282

8 hours ago

Isn't it more plausible that it was an accident? Anchors cut these cables all the time.

earthnail

7 hours ago

No, because the ship was zigzagging over the sea cable.

lyu07282

7 hours ago

Just to be clear: that is a claim not a fact.

pcl

8 hours ago

100 miles of anchor dragging is a lot.

xchip

6 hours ago

Such a big boat cannot zigzag. Do you have any links?

Jensson

6 hours ago

Big boats cannot turn? It just takes longer and is harder to hide but all boats can do it.

rhdjebejdbd

4 hours ago

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

yownie

2 hours ago

best slam poetry contender I've seen on HN yet!

kukkamario

8 hours ago

Well Yi Peng 3 recently changed operating only between Chinese ports to operating only outside China and mostly to Russian ports. Current actual owner is probably some Russian oligarch.

tokai

8 hours ago

Oreshnik does not register for the people living around the Baltic sea. We have seen big explosions in Ukraine for years now, its not going to move any discourse in northen europe by now. Not saying that the cable cut will, but it has a better chance.

rob74

8 hours ago

Well, the "big explosions" have led Sweden and Finland to apply for Nato membership (and actually get it after various delays caused by Putin's allies) after staying neutral for almost 75 years. And everyone knows that Russia has missiles, so Oreshnik only demonstrated that they actually work (which I think no one seriously doubted either). The question is just whether Russia is willing to use these missiles (and maybe worse) against other targets too...

benterix

7 hours ago

> Oreshnik only demonstrated that they actually work (which I think no one seriously doubted either)

Actually, many people started to seriously doubt anything that Russia says, especially concerning their military power in the light of their spectacular failures especially at the beginning of the war.

Regarding their nuclear arsenal from Soviet times, we are right to doubt in what shape it is and whether it could pose more damage to other countries or Russia itself.

As for Oreshnik, we have no idea how many copies they actually have, but at least the USA have practiced successfully intercepting hypersonic missiles already several years ago. I doubt they would export the tech to Ukraine, though.

lrmanc

7 hours ago

We were told that the Iron Dome works, yet the relatively slow Iranian ballistic missiles got through in large numbers.

Now the U.S. ships a small number of THAAD missiles to Israel, presumably in the hope of testing THAAD under real world conditions.

Patriot missiles in Ukraine do not have a 100% intercept rate. What is the new miracle weapon that is supposed to intercept 18 hypersonic MIRVS in a single IRBM?

Perhaps withdrawing from the INF treaty in 2018 wasn't such a great idea. Perhaps reverting to SS20/PershingII times is not such a great idea. Back then the German Green Party owed much of its existence to protesting both. Now it is an obedient war party.

Since the U.S. wants to station IRBMs in Germany, thereby making it the primary nuclear playground again while being safe itself: Will Germany also get these anti-IRBM wonder weapons and will they actually work?

SiempreViernes

7 hours ago

> Will Germany also get these anti-IRBM wonder weapons and will they actually work?

Sure, you just have to pay ;)

-- Lockheed Martin

guappa

8 hours ago

What big explosions are you referring to?

SiempreViernes

7 hours ago

Wrong person, its tokai that introduced the term.

alephnerd

8 hours ago

> The article cites Russian involvement again, followed by mentioning the Yi Peng 3 anchor-dragging accusations.

> It seems unlikely that the Chinese would get involved at the behest of the Russians. Russia depends on China now and not vice versa

1. Russia still has significant autonomy and is not a "client state" yet.

The Russia-Ukraine War itself was a major blow for Chinese ambitions - much of China's naval (eg. Aircraft carriers [0]) and aerospace technology (eg. Turbofan Jet Engines [1]) exists thanks to Ukraine's defense industry in the 2000s and 2010s. Ukraine was also one of China's largest Belt and Road Initiative (BRI/OBOR) partners in Europe [7], which has all now gone to smoke.

Russia's rapprochement with NK is also worrisome for China, as China is trying to negotiate a three-way free trade agreement [2] with South Korea and Japan which collapsed as both view North Korea as an existential threat [3], and North Korea has pivoted towards Russia for military cooperation because China has also unofficially committed to North Korean denuclearization in order to unblock the China-South Korea-Japan FTA [4]

2. The crew on the ship were Russian nationals. The ship was China flagged, and realistically this was probably a Russian operation. This fiasco came at a horrible time, as European policymakers are in the process of adding additional tarriffs on China and de-coupling from China, and this fiasco only proved that point.

3. Even Russia doesn't want to become a client state of China. This is why Russia has been wooing North Korea as leverage as NK has become increasingly anti-China [5], and diversifying trade relations by leveraging India, especially because it was Russia that mediated between China and India during the 2020 Galwan Crisis which almost became a China-India War [6]

-------------

All in all, the Russia-Ukraine War was a massive failure for Chinese ambitions, and treating Russia and China as part of a single axis doesn't make sense.

[0] - https://galeapps.gale.com/apps/auth?userGroupName=mlin_oweb&...

[1] - https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/CASI/documents/R...

[2] - https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Trade/China-Japan-and-South-...

[3] - https://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/d01007/security-tensions-...

[4] - https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2024/05/844fe5afa077-japa...

[5] - https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/25278704

[6] - https://www.deccanherald.com/world/how-russia-and-singapore-...

[7] - https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/259271

nemetroid

8 hours ago

> The crew on the ship were Russian nationals.

Citation needed. The sources I can find (e.g. [1]) claim that the vessel "is captained by a Chinese national and includes a Russian sailor". The first part can be verified by the strong accent of the radio operator [2].

1: https://archive.is/3weox

2: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/kina-redo-att-samarbeta-o...

orbital-decay

7 hours ago

It wasn't a sailor, it was the maritime pilot from the port it departed. He left the ship before the incident.

ajross

8 hours ago

It's a Chinese-flagged ship, not a ship operating at the direction of the PRC. While one doesn't want to assign guilt too quickly, it's extremely reasonable that they just took a contract to sail a bunch of Russian around and not ask questions. Or even to rent out the whole ship to a Russian crew

I mean, this is spy stuff here. It strains reason to expect that Russia would use only clearly identified Russian government vessels for its clandestine sabotage operations.

heraldgeezer

7 hours ago

>Certainly the visual effects of Oreshnik were greater than a cable cut that just reduces gamer latency in Finland for a couple of days.

The Russians are testing our response and response times. They do it like this by cutting cables, they sail ships close to the border, they cross into our airspace.

Remember, in the 80s a Soviet submarine ""accidentally"" ran aground in southern Sweden. (Totally not spying on us btw)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_S-363

If real war happens, physically cutting communications will certainly be part of it.

Hamuko

8 hours ago

I think it's less of a matter if Russia can get China involved in its sabotage operations and more if they can get a handful Chinese citizens involved in its sabotage operations.

Eumenes

8 hours ago

Just like the Nord Stream, huh?

benterix

7 hours ago

It's the Nord Stream even a topic anymore? It was a shameful project from the start with the involvement of corrupted politicians like Schroeder (the guy had the balls to sue the Bundestag after all this...). It's an embarrassement for everyone and it's good it's gone.

I hope one day after Putin dies Russia becomes a free country and at that point we could consider using this pipeline - or even build more! But now it's just an infamous piece of infra nobody wants to deal with.

jampekka

8 hours ago

In Finnish news currently whenever anything bad happens, the first suspicion is a conspiracy throry about Russian involvement. The press is in sort of a war propaganda mode.

And if you mention this, you're an instant suspect of taking part in a Russian disinformation campaign.

alkonaut

8 hours ago

> the first suspicion is a conspiracy throry about Russian involvement.

Would you agree that this suspicion is a good base hypothesis for most forms of suspected sabotage?

preisschild

8 hours ago

> the first suspicion is a conspiracy throry about Russian involvement

Its not war propaganda when there is actually a lot of proven "hybrid warfare" being conducted by Russia. This fits perfectly in their MO

itsoktocry

8 hours ago

>conducted by Russia

Conducted by everyone, including the US and the west (in fact, I'm positive that we are the best at it).

aguaviva

2 hours ago

Not the sabotage under discussion. Which can have only one actor behind it.

benterix

7 hours ago

The closest what I can call it is whataboutism. Russia is actively trying to provoke the West in various ways. The most that West is doing is helping Ukraine to defend itself. We are not gathering poor immigrants into planes and transporting them to borders with Finland, Poland etc. instructing them to push their way to the other side. We are not sending inflammable materials via commercial airplanes. And we are not killing Russian spies in Moscow like they did with Lytvynenko.

As for Putin being upset with the West helping Ukraine: they can stop it at any moment. It's enough they stop attacking Ukraine and go home, as simple as that.

willy_k

6 hours ago

To be fair if we were the best at it, we would probably have less obvious / more easily deniable methods of getting our way.

> As for Putin being upset with the West helping Ukraine: they can stop it at any moment. It's enough they stop attacking Ukraine and go home, as simple as that.

The way I see it, staying in the war to force a treatise is Putin’s only option to preserve his regime, as well as his intention from the start, not anticipating the US prolonging the conflict.

preisschild

4 hours ago

> Conducted by everyone, including the US and the west

No we don't unless you think helping a victim defend against an aggressor is on the same level

simion314

7 hours ago

Exactly comrade, same when a personality that opposes Putin is assassinated on Putin's birthday all non Russians start with conspiracies when the FSB clearly told us it is a coincidence. Same when critics f Putin die from falling from windows, or when people Putin named traitors get posissoned with nerve gas, tons of consp[conspiracies.

Can;t it be just a coincidence that all this people die and Putin is not a giant criminal? Russians do not like criminals, they would not worship criminals like Stalin, Putin, the Wagner guy

/sarcasm

itsoktocry

8 hours ago

>The article cites Russian involvement again

Everything gets blamed on Russia now. The press and politicians tells us Russia is both incompetent and omnipotent. "Normal" people on Twitter will accuse you of being a "Russian bot" if you have a slightly different opinion. We blamed the Russians for blowing up their own pipeline for no reason in particular. It's crazy.

Is this a meta-attack from Russia to flood the information space so that blaming Russia becomes something people ignore? Hmmm....

fastball

8 hours ago

Paying the captain of a cargo vessel to damage an undersea cable by dragging his anchor for 160km isn't exactly a conspiracy theory that requires Russian "omnipotence".

Most people I know think the Ukrainians blew up Nordstream.

mistermann

8 hours ago

Do you mock people in wheelchairs for not being able to walk also? Holy jeez man.

jb1991

9 hours ago

Apparently the South China Sea now extends all the way to the Baltic Sea.

dmortin

9 hours ago

Will they make the Chinese ship company pay for the reparations and big fine on top of that for cutting cable? Because if not then it will happen again and again.

morkalork

8 hours ago

Fines? Act like a privateer, get treated like a privateer. The people bankrolling this behaviour don't care about fines.

jagrsw

8 hours ago

Turning the Baltic into a "NATO lake" by controlling the Finland-Estonia strait would be an interesting idea, especially now with Finland and Sweden in the alliance. Effectively limiting Russian naval access from St. Petersburg (except for civilian traffic, subject to inspection) would certainly boost regional security.

Article on this recently: https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2024/7/10/b...

An effective retaliation option, I guess kept in reserve, "just in case" retaliation is needed.

alkonaut

8 hours ago

Russia has already anticipated this problem and updated their nuclear doctrine to include nuclear first use also against countries that would "isolate" Russian territory (Presumably thinking of Crimea and Kaliningrad).

Edit: Not sure what the downvote is. It's factually true. I don't think that necessarily means it's a bad idea or that it's a red line that should be observed when all other red lines are obviously illusions.

Hamuko

7 hours ago

Russian nuclear doctorine is just words on paper and doesn't mean anything. Their nuclear doctorine already allows them to nuke any NATO country at will because "any attack by a non-nuclear power (Ukraine) supported by a nuclear power (US, UK, France) would be considered a joint attack" and "any attack by one member of a military bloc would be considered an attack by the entire alliance". And even if they didn't, there's no actual opposition that could prevent changing the doctorine as they wish.

0points

7 hours ago

TBF, the pieces you mention was just added some weeks ago in what parent refers to by "their updated nuclear doctrine".

heraldgeezer

7 hours ago

"nooo sovereign countries can't go into alliances and do what they want within their borders!!!!" - Putin

lyu07282

7 hours ago

It feels really meaningless to talk about "Russia" like this when in reality it's just Putin and his personal discretion, not "Russian nuclear doctrine". It's a dictatorship not a republic.

jltsiren

7 hours ago

Russia is an oligarchic republic. It's neither a dictatorship nor a liberal democracy. And regardless of the power he has, Putin is still a product of the system. His eventual successor will quite likely be another similar leader.

orbital-decay

3 hours ago

The word "oligarch" has "arch" in it, which means power. What power the supposed oligarchs had over the decision to invade the neighbors and start a massive wealth redistribution inside the country, that practically depraved them of what they had? Lisin refused to call himself "oligarch" in 2018 first, and everyone laughed at him at the time. Maybe he had better insight than the armchair experts, after all.

> regardless of the power he has, Putin is still a product of the system.

Yes, and the system in question is FSB, or vaguely siloviki in general, not the business elite. It's extremely decentralized.

aguaviva

3 hours ago

Russia is an oligarchic republic.

Even 10 years ago this was no longer true. Putin completely quashed the oligarchy -- and what he succeeded in building in its place has been by far the strongest one-man system the country has seen since Stalin. The oligarchy will likely have some success in reasserting itself, at least for a while after he croaks/fades in a few years.

His eventual successor will quite likely be another similar leader.

You almost want to wish, right?

The problem with the system he created is that it can only be managed by someone very much like himself. But Putin's really quite unusual, both for Russia and when compared with virtually any leader we've ever known anywhere.

His "successor" will likely be an effective power vacuum, visible to the outside world as an open-ended period of instability. It's entirely possible (likely even) that the security agencies will try to someone up the flagpole again, at least for a while. But it's difficult to imagine that person having the actual battery of intelligence, skills -- and sheer force of will -- to run things the way Putin has.

See also: Такого как Путин - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk_VszbZa_s

quickthrowman

6 hours ago

Russia is a mafia that owns both a gas station and (unfortunately for its neighbors) nuclear weapons.

hollerith

6 hours ago

Russia is a civilization with 1200 years of history.

jagrsw

5 hours ago

It's more accurate to say Russia's history as a distinct entity goes back around 850 years. Before that, it was part of Kyivan Rus', and the term "Ruthenian" primarily referred to the people and territory of modern-day Ukraine. Moscow Rus' was initially a peripheral, tribal offshoot of the larger Kyivan polity.

alkonaut

7 hours ago

The same could be said for the Soviet Union as well. The nuclear doctrine is just Putin trying to point out that he is frustrated. Luckily nuclear deterrence in general is useless in deterring anything except nuclear attack.

newsclues

8 hours ago

The Russians hate this and will do sneaky stuff to counter this.

benterix

8 hours ago

> The Russians

I know it's a mental shortcut and if we wanted to be precise it would quickly become unwieldy so just a quick note, also to self, that the Russians I know don't have and don't want to have anything to do with this, are fed up with what is going on and just want to live in peace.

jagrsw

7 hours ago

As a Pole by birth, I'm undoubtedly biased. However, it's not as simple as "Putin wants war, despite opposition from most Russians." Living near the USSR border and within the Soviet sphere of influence taught me that a vast majority of Russians prioritize a strong, assertive nation, often placing societal and economic development lower on their list of needs. If that means occasional invasions and killings, it's part of the game.

Putin may achieve 80%+ support through rigged elections, but even without rigging, it's likely 60%+. So, it's not a simple dichotomy of the Russian people versus Putin - it's more complex.

That said, I also have Russian friends (many now former Russians) who passionately hate the current government and condemn its actions.

benterix

7 hours ago

While I agree with you, this is not a static phenomenon. For example, recent pools give some hope with the majority being in favor of ending the war:

https://www.thebarentsobserver.com/news/declining-war-suppor...

This is the lowest support for the war in Russia since the beginning. I know the limitations of such polls but there is some truth behind them.

alkonaut

7 hours ago

> being in favor of ending the war

It would be good to hear how many that were in favor of ending the war because it's the right thing to do. Because it's unjust. Because it's an invasion of a sovereign nation. Not just "Because the sanctions make my butter too expensive".

The difference being that if the former number is over 50% that might mean the people would be for change, for new leadership and direction. If the latter is above 50 that just means people want cheaper butter. Perhaps wait a bit and try invading later. Or invade some weaker nation.

willy_k

6 hours ago

I think saving their sons is a more pressing issue than the old-news sanctions.

From a Russian perspective it’s not at all clear that it’s unjust; Ukraine was persecuting ethnic Russians and the initial claimed purpose of the war was to bring ethnic Russian regions back into Russia.

aguaviva

3 hours ago

From a Russian perspective

From what its current regime says for internal and external propaganda purposes.

jagrsw

5 hours ago

Classic playbook - aggressors always claim grievances: Japan and oil access, Germany and Prussia/Danzig extranational transport corridors, Russia and "oppressed comrades".

Tribalism is a powerful reality distortion force.

willy_k

5 hours ago

Don’t forget America and WMDs, America and commies, America and commies, and America and commies.

aguaviva

3 hours ago

A "perspective" that was always equally fake and delusional, of course.

user

7 hours ago

[deleted]

Salmonfisher11

8 hours ago

The perfectly trained repair dolphins did their work. Good job.

They have earned themselves a large can of Surströmming.

user

8 hours ago

[deleted]

user

7 hours ago

[deleted]

bastloing

8 hours ago

Let the tracking, tracing, and data grabs begin again! Best thing ever, drop off the internet for a week. Great for mental health!

diggan

8 hours ago

Luckily (unluckily?), the internet is smart enough to route around single links disappearing :)

personalityson

8 hours ago

When you lose your internet connection, its the perfect time to lay back and dive into your thoughts, to contemplate over your oh wait its back on

heraldgeezer

7 hours ago

https://www.submarinecablemap.com/

Plenty of cables.

BUT this is a test by the Russians of our response.

You people always try to either downplay or exaggerate.

"oh nothing happened so it is fine" or "waowh internet totally went down!!!" This is also propaganda to try an minimize the Russians actions.

jacknews

7 hours ago

So is there some evidence of sabotage?

Now that they've repaired the damage they should know, right?

Or was this whole thing all just manufactured accusations and scaremongering by the western governments and press?

lrasinen

3 hours ago

The last time there was cable and gas pipe damage in the Baltic, it took about two weeks for the investigators to do their thing and hold a press briefing. Some details ("mechanical damage, doesn't look like an explosion") had been published before, but most of the investigation results were publicized all at once.

What is publicly known this time: when and where the cables were cut (locations approximately, times accurately), and that there's a Chinese ship (Yi Peng 3) that was followed by Danish navy vessels, and the ship has been anchored for a week with constant guard from German and Danish (and possibly Swedish) navy.

There's a video[1] by a Finnish sea captain with MarineTraffic history access going over the track of YP3. Since it's in Finnish, a brief summary (or try your luck with auto-translation):

1) The ship sets off with a speed of 9-10 knots, but then slows down to 5-6 knots for 400 km or so, before returning to 9-10 knots. While weather could be a factor, other ships in the area experience no slowdowns. 2) The ship crosses the cables right around the reported break times. 3) There is an additional slowdown to 3-4 knots near a known underwater sand ridge. 4) The ships heading jumps around a bit; again, the other ships do not do this. 5) There is a missing portion in AIS data; however, this is seen with other ships as well.

Now, this is all circumstantial evidence, but is consistent with dragging the anchor on the seafloor for an extended period of time. Calling it sabotage would require establishing malicious intent, of course.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fB-vEp3wr-0

alkonaut

7 hours ago

That conclusion probably takes some time. Even if they found some evidence now, we're unlikely to hear about it until the investigations are wrapped up. And there are multiple criminal investigations in at least 3 countries, so it won't be this year.

jacknews

6 hours ago

I'm fairly confident that if there was any evidence what so ever of sabotage, we'd be hearing it now, loud and clear.

Perhaps not the 'who' but certainly the 'done it'.

heraldgeezer

7 hours ago

The ship went over 2 cables and dragged its anchor 100 miles.

They knew what they were doing.

Don't try and play coy ruskie.

jacknews

7 hours ago

OK Mr McCarthy, where is this documented?

And that it was deliberate?

Are you talking about the Chinese ship? Why would they do that?

fyi I'm a westerner, just maybe not so enveloped in the bubble so many of you seem to be.