That link is federal, and binding arbitration would exclude from the class action.

Provinces have lemon laws, each their own. But beyond refund, people want redress for the fact that Mitsubishi lied, and also sold a vehicle unsuitable for its stated purpose.

A lemon law refund won't cover the hours spent dealing with this stupidity. People can still get help via lemon laws, but also joint the class action.

Frankly, it really weirded me out to see this, and then a few months after the heat pump thing. Just bizarre. Something is fishy with Mitsubishi.

Because I posted it at 4am EDT last time on a Sunday morning, and this is a better time? Because there's nothing wrong with reposting?

How would a “cursory research” reveal that they are lying in their online material?