Yes, you should panic about AI

7 pointsposted 9 hours ago
by haizhung

4 Comments

runningmike

12 minutes ago

It's not the technology you should be afraid of. Just like any new technology people will use it for good and bad. There are problems that now can be solved with new ML algorithms that were very hard to solve in the past. But problems that are so called "wicked problems" are always hard to solve with technology only.

SillyUsername

6 hours ago

I'm still of the belief this is Y2K. Doom mongers said the world would end, that people didn't know the extent of the problem.

When the date rolled over, very little went wrong.

Now to be fair, the high risk scenarios, systems that do navigation, financial systems, emergency services and so on were all migrated. Operating systems upgraded which covered a large swathe of problems.

So the solution wasn't just nothing happened, it was that we prepped for the worst cases and prevented them. This is exactly what we're doing now, security in harnesses, not giving AI access to everything, hardening all the software vulnerabilities that are found before they are exploited.

Biological weapons are always a risk, but this has always been the case with just humans too. The ease at which we can kill has rapidly improved, but this hasn't shown propensity for us to kill more.

AI in this respect is the ultimate enabler, I would expect a period of small events happening, but widespread end the world, much less likely (we'd more likely be wiped out by a human started WW3).

jleyank

8 hours ago

Perhaps either option is bad. If AI is a con or a bubble, a whole lot of money and people’s careers will be destroyed. If, however, AI is a transformation, a whole lot of money and people’s careers will still be destroyed. The money will be transferred to those holding the tokens and the career wreckage will be software and other knowledge workers trying to determine how to get by.

The problem in the latter case will be “who has the money to consume” as we’re living in a consumer economy. I don’t know what the answer is, but I think it best that one doesn’t accelerate things to a resolution. Society and governmental systems aren’t ready to handle tremendous disruption. It ain’t Star Trek.

sjdh76

7 hours ago

Runaway trains can be slowed down by Catch Locos (eg CSX 8888 Incident). But the bigger point is no one asked the plebs to think about the problem or come up with solution. The modern attention economy makes money by dumping problems in peoples lap that is way abv their pay grade. With Religion in decline the story that generates meaning in peoples head is what ever feels scary and gets attention.