syntaxing
5 hours ago
I’m so desperate for home battery using sodium batteries. Safer and lower temperature it can operate at. Low energy density but I don’t care for home battery.
rootusrootus
4 hours ago
I want to have viable replacements for all the old school lithium ion battery packs so that I won't wonder when the day will come that one of the many we have will experience thermal runaway while nobody is around to deal with it. IMO a world where we no longer worry about spontaneous battery fires can't happen soon enough.
numpad0
an hour ago
Battery voltages are dependent on chemistry, or, standard electrode potentials of metals used. It can't be configured like way past fractions of volts. And Li has about the highest potential among metals, which is kind of the point of using Li. Which means straight swapping NMC cells with any substitute will cause overcharging. Maybe there are cell configurations that could work in series packs, but it can't be simple swap-ins.
marcosdumay
44 minutes ago
There will probably never be a battery that can power your home but can be used without any kind of worry.
The right thing is to place the battery in a way that you don't have to worry abut the fire, not to expect a high-density battery to be perfectly safe.
adrianN
37 minutes ago
A tank of diesel and a generator are a kind of battery that you have to worry about very little.
ricardobeat
2 hours ago
Standard sodium batteries are much more explosive than LiFE
nine_k
an hour ago
Can they experience a thermal runaway? Can it be triggered by minor deformations or dents?
ricardobeat
37 minutes ago
https://youtu.be/W1ya_ls1zkA?t=209
CATL has demonstrated much better safety for their sodium EV batteries, but home and energy storage packs are more likely to be made of standard 18650 cells like the one in the video.
margalabargala
5 hours ago
There is an aqueous variant of sodium ion batteries that are safer than lithium, but most sodium ion batteries are NOT that variant and are more dangerous than LiFePO4.
syntaxing
4 hours ago
Wait what? All data I see about sodium ion is safer than LFP. I’m by no means an expert and would love to see why it’s the other way around
margalabargala
4 hours ago
It's definitely not that cut and dry. Here's a paper with a good breakdown of safety comparisons: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X2...
Tldr: while sodium thermal runaways are less dangerous than lithium, they are more likely to happen, and in particular charging a sodium battery to 100% SOC makes thermal runaway significantly more likely than in LFP batteries.
It's true that things like puncture or short circuit are much much less dangerous than with lithium. That is a big part of why the increased thermal runaway risk gets overlooked.
DannyBee
4 hours ago
Agreed.
The main thing about LFP is people (stupidly) shove them in a basement or enclosed space because they are "safe".
But the "safe" part is that they outgas hydrogen when in thermal runaway, which, combined with enclosed spaces like basements (where people often have gas heaters or ....), is .... a super super bad idea.
Ironically, in this situation, sodium-ion is worse than LFP in almost every conceivable way - the gas is more flammable, toxic, etc.
People who think sodium-ion is "safer" are being sold a bill of goods.
WarmWash
3 hours ago
There is also the possibility of releasing hydrogen cyanide during a runaway event for some variants too
UncleOxidant
4 hours ago
Sodium batteries will only continue to get cheaper. Cost parity now, but probably closer to 1/2 the price in a few years as production ramps up.
MarsZebra
an hour ago
Aren't sodium higher density (at least in terms of energy per weight) than LiFe?
Maybe you're right in terms of energy per volume. Sodium are very light weight in my experience.
SubiculumCode
26 minutes ago
yeah, I am waiting to replace my home battery for the safer sodium option whenever it becomes possible. I keep hoping.
maxnevermind
4 hours ago
I thought the main advantage in comparison with LFP is the lower price(long term) and better sub-zero performance?
syntaxing
4 hours ago
Nope. Almost all batteries I see for LFP have heaters for them at too low temps (around freezing 0C/32F). Where as sodium ion can discharge at -25C
benjiro29
4 hours ago
Discharging is not the issue with LiPo4 or other lithium tech. They can work up to negative temperatures without any issue. They can go down to -20°C (-4°F).
The problem is charging the battery at negative, as this damages the internal structure. So you need to heat up the battery (aka, you discharge by warming up heating elements), until you hit the right point. And then you can charge up, what will create heat and thus allow for non-damaging charging.
Some even have a fun trick, where if your going to a EV station with your car (end point route on your build in sat nav). They can start to pre-drain the battery if its really too cold, to warm up the batteries even more. So by the time your at the charger, the batteries are on temperature. I forgot what brand did it that way, seen that feature years ago.
What is different is that Sodium-Ion batteries can charge from negative (i think it was -10°C), as they do not suffer from the same damaging effect.
martinald
3 hours ago
Nearly all EVs now do "battery preconditioning" when on the way to a charger. They would be pretty unusable without, I know one person had a model that didn't have it (this was a few years back) and he could barely pull more than 10kW in winter from public chargers, vs 100kW+ in summer at the exact same chargers.
dwattttt
4 hours ago
Tesla do this if they know they're navigating to a charger.
pfdietz
4 hours ago
There's a yttrium-containing variety of LFP that's supposed to work better at lower temperature (down to -45 C). But yttrium itself is quite expensive ($35/kg).
rcxdude
4 hours ago
lithium batteries can usually discharge below 0C, it's the charging at sub-zero temperatures that kills them.
lazide
3 hours ago
Lithium can discharge just fine at -25C without heaters.
Charging it at or around 0C will destroy it extremely rapidly due to electroplating of lithium.
UqWBcuFx6NV4r
2 hours ago
Honestly, yes, re energy density. I hadn’t seen home batteries in-person until a couple of years ago. I was surprised by how small they could actually be (still with a decent capacity). I’d totally trade some of that for chemistry with a less… catastrophic failure mode, and I don’t even have a big house, even for non-US standards.
Not speaking one way or the other on sodium ion’s properties specifically. I see from sibling comments that it’s not straightforward.
toomuchtodo
5 hours ago
Are you in the US?
syntaxing
4 hours ago
Yup
toomuchtodo
3 hours ago
I’m hopeful that sodium batteries are going to come down in cost quickly, but if you can find a provider like Base Power or similar where it’s heavily subsidized, there’s a small upfront fee, and they can provide you the economic benefits until sodium batteries reach favorable economic success criteria, that’s a shim until you can replace that with sodium batteries you own outright at a favorable price. You’d have to model what you can get today with a sodium chemistry versus what you can get on offer from one of these battery service providers.
It’s fundamentally a modeling exercise in the forward economic returns curve in the context of your energy needs. Lithium battery lease today as a power purchase agreement (potentially), and then swapping out for a purchased and owned sodium battery pack when the cost hits the right price. It’s always harder to predict the future the further out you attempt to predict, and this technology state of the art is moving very rapidly.