schleck8
15 hours ago
It's threatening the construction boom, but it's still mostly American companies that are benefiting from an AI buildout, no matter where it happens globally (with the exception of China).
Google announced yesterday that they are pouring an additional 15 billion USD into Malaysia for compute. ByteDance is also building there, through DayOne. If you think about it, there aren't many reasons against constructing AI inference capacity outside the US. You tend to have less local resistance and there are plenty of countries with sufficient grid robustness and internet backbones. Malaysia already has many datacenters so this isn't novel.
LLMs typically don't have high latency sensitivity since reasoning models came around, so you aren't forced to build them near users, and East Asia is seeing lots of adoption anyways.
So all in all, I think US legislators are overestimating their leverage here
curt15
15 hours ago
> You tend to have less local resistance and there are plenty of countries with sufficient grid robustness and internet backbones.
What explains the reduced local resistance? Do Malaysian residents simply have less political power, or do Malaysian datacenters somehow solve the technical challenges that beget resistance in home countries?
n_u
14 hours ago
Not about Malaysia specifically but this article from the Economist suggests that there is less resistance to AI outside of the rich world
https://www.economist.com/international/2026/10/22/the-surpr...
inglor_cz
13 hours ago
Maybe China hasn't yet spent enough money to foment "grassroots" movements against data centers in Malaysia?
Given the globally relevant character of AI, I would be very surprised if all the anti-AI sentiment on English language social networks was organic.
iAMkenough
13 hours ago
They make for great targets in foreign conflicts.
cyanydeez
15 hours ago
well, they have plenty of leverage, unless the technocrats want to try to run Argentina into the ground.
whoanoway
12 hours ago
[dead]