Vi Turns 50: The True History of vi

20 pointsposted 19 hours ago
by so-cal-schemer

10 Comments

so-cal-schemer

19 hours ago

The vi editor was developed starting around 1976 by Bill Joy, who was then a graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley. Joy later went on to help found Sun Microsystems and became its Chief Scientist.

https://www.linfo.org/vi/history.html

https://world.hey.com/dhh/wonderful-vi-a1d034d3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi_(text_editor)

ndom91

8 hours ago

Out of curiosity, turns 50 based on what? I can't find any reference that it's first release was in Nov 1976 or anything along those lines.

Most sources just say "started development in 1976".

so-cal-schemer

18 hours ago

vi: /V�I/, not, /vi:/, never, /siks/, n.

[from ‘Visual Interface’] A screen editor crufted together by Bill Joy for an early BSD release. Became the de facto standard Unix editor and a nearly undisputed hacker favorite outside of MIT until the rise of EMACS after about 1984. Tends to frustrate new users no end, as it will neither take commands while expecting input text nor vice versa, and the default setup on older versions provides no indication of which mode the editor is in (years ago, a correspondent reported that he has often heard the editor's name pronounced /vi:l/; there is now a vi clone named vile). Nevertheless vi (and variants such as vim and elvis) is still widely used (about half the respondents in a 1991 Usenet poll preferred it), and even EMACS fans often resort to it as a mail editor and for small editing jobs (mainly because it starts up faster than the bulkier versions of EMACS). See holy wars.

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/V/vi.html

iberator

18 hours ago

[flagged]

e40

16 hours ago

Emacs user… wow, didn’t know any of that. Was at UCB 80-84. Switched to Gosling’s emacs in 82ish, GNU in 83 while rms was visiting UCB. He shared Prof Fateman’s grad student office. Wild times.

iberator

11 hours ago

emacs sucks on pc keyboards. I hate it too.

solyin

13 hours ago

Do they have :x for :wq ? I've been trying to track where :x came from and have come up short.