PHP Foundation 'under-funded' with one full-time staff member, director says

131 pointsposted 11 hours ago
by firesteelrain

86 Comments

bwoebi

11 hours ago

The actual work expenses of the PHP foundation can be viewed here:

https://opencollective.com/phpfoundation/transactions?search... and https://opencollective.com/php-foundation-eur/transactions?s...

(seems like "work" selects most of that)

And it's not cheap to pay that many people, especially not full time (which is partly why they don't have more full-time contractors). According to https://opencollective.com/phpfoundation#category-BUDGET they only have a balance $350k currently, sinking.

It'd be really awesome, if more companies would sponsor the PHP foundation (especially with thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per year. A lot of small contributions is nice, but not enough.). The work of a few core maintainers is really crucial to the continued development of PHP.

MattGaiser

9 hours ago

Are there many serious companies using PHP?

It overwhelmingly seems like the language of the cheap and not very technical or providers of services to the cheap and not very technical.

justinator

8 hours ago

It's used on Pornhub so it's both very useful and very important but excuse me princess if it's not on the next Mars lander robot.

hdjrudni

7 hours ago

Naughty America uses it too. We met some guys from there in a hot tub at the hotel we were staying at for a PHP conference.

justinator

7 hours ago

I know AI gets the headlines but PHP is what's putting food on tables in this industry.

cucumber3732842

6 hours ago

The entire internet from that era is still built on it.

I worked at a major CDN with roots in the dot com era. PHP errywhere. You wanna log on and see your bill you're invoking like 40 different (modern containerized) lamp stacks.

jerf

9 hours ago

It is used all over the place in ways you don't even realize. "not very technical or providers of services to the cheap and not very technical" is a particular corner of the market that is visible and full of PHP, sure, but you don't see the huge masses of PHP code running that doesn't expose a .php on the end of the URL.

40four

6 hours ago

I understand why people still have this perception, I imagine due to relics of the past of the PHP 5 (or earlier) era. But those days are long gone, and I believe PHP 8 has some a nice job of adding modern features and improving developer experience.

Wordpress is the obvious answer to your question, but its codebase is admittedly still stuck in the past in many ways. Nobody would write it that way if they were starting from scratch today.

There are plenty of “serious” companies using Laravel or Symfony. Take a look around those codebases if you want to get an idea of what solid modern PHP design patterns look like nowadays. Nothing “cheap or not very technical” about them :)

4ndrewl

9 hours ago

It's mainly used by profitable and/or public sector orgs, so unlikely to have much intersection with the HN crowd.

tdeck

6 hours ago

Unfortunately those sound like organizations that wouldn't see much value in the goodwill generated by funding PHP.

wyclif

6 hours ago

Know who uses PHP? Companies that actually make money.

card_zero

5 hours ago

Some Amazon sites, they said. Lots of random companies and institutions: a Danish IT company, a Dutch cybersecurity company, Orange telecoms (in France). Various governments' sites for various services. Some BBC TV show pages, a gym group, a Japanese airline, Asahi (the brewers), Finland's state IT provider.

BadBadJellyBean

9 hours ago

Wordpress and Nextcloud are two very prominent pieces of software that come to mind that are built on PHP. I'm sure there is more out there.

swat535

8 hours ago

I suppose my question would be: what would be the reason to choose PHP in 2026 for a greenfield project over the plethora of other available languages?

40four

5 hours ago

Laravel is one of the most comprehensive and best developer experiences around. Give it a spin of you haven’t tried it.

swat535

5 hours ago

I asked a genuine question. Does Laravel deliver a superior developer experience than let's say Rails or Djano?

Like if I were to sell PHP in 2026 to a new team, how would I position it?

dofm

3 hours ago

It does. Just look at quality of the documentation for starters.

Laravel is really excellent. PHP’s package manager, Composer, is great, and Laravel makes excellent use of it. The two main front end tools, Livewire and Inertia, are fun, with good starter kits. It has an elegant built in AI SDK, an official LLM developer integration, good payments support. There’s a new typescript binding. It has, IMO, one of the few truly well-designed ORM implementations.

There’s an incredible community around it. Lighthouse, the schema-first GraphQL package, is one of the neatest I have seen.

And PHP 8.x is a much more capable language than people expect. LLMs speak it well and are typically very up to date with its capabilities.

ETA: I think one of the things that sets it apart from other environments is the sense that it has a mature clarity of purpose, to be honest. In this AI-slop-documentation era, have a look at the documentation, the clarity of it, the ease of onboarding. Laravel as a project tends to execute well on ideas, has sensible defaults etc.; it just feels grown-up. It moves a little slower than other frameworks in terms of innovation, but sweats the details. It also has a well-managed upgrade process.

Unfortunately, I think PHP, and ultimately Ruby, Python, Perl, and Node.js, will all eventually be proven to be inappropriate for web development. It feels to me like we are heading away from a world where every application sits on top of an interpreter and a huge attack surface.

For myself, I really like Laravel; I have deployed apps in it that did good things for people and it was never once in my way. It has been fun, simple, even quite poetic to use. But I think I am done with these sorts of programming environments, and I am going to force myself back to things with a smaller footprint.

I certainly think that one aspect of PHP has to change, and that is the tendency to deploy with distro packages. That is clearly an inappropriate burden in the LLM-assisted hacking era.

bawolff

8 hours ago

Facebook (although they forked it)

Wikipedia

Wordpress

tdeck

6 hours ago

Slack's backend is PHP I believe.

cyanydeez

8 hours ago

Isn't there some large php based software run by a bruised ego who can't even get his own house in order, let alone help fund his largesse, but complains about his leeches.

Hrmmm.

Hamuko

9 hours ago

Is Facebook still using it?

Also, not a company but Wikimedia Foundation definitely has some funds too.

pkaye

9 hours ago

I think Facebook switched to their own language Hack a decade ago.

damontal

9 hours ago

Didn’t they roll their own version of it?

gchamonlive

10 hours ago

There are countless applications out there still running on PHP, but if the community interest can't raise the required resources to maintain the tool, maybe it's time for it to die, or at least downgrade into maintenance mode so in time it'll become a legacy language.

dofm

3 hours ago

The “community” has only just managed to find the resources to maintain NTP. I think if “nobody is donating” is your standard for whether things should live or die, then we are all hopelessly fucked.

gchamonlive

2 hours ago

My standard is not having a single full-time employee without the proper resources to maintain the technology. If the community would find the resources, all is well, but better than to run it on fumes would be to give everyone time to move on.

dofm

2 hours ago

OK, but you understand that by that same standard you’d have sunsetted NTP. Harlan Stenn was maintaining it for a pittance; nowhere near a full developer salary.

gchamonlive

2 hours ago

How do they call it, it's the "business risk"? Who am I to question it. Let's just take care nobody loses an eye in the process.

londons_explore

10 hours ago

If they asked harder for donations, they would surely raise enough for maintenance.

Plenty of companies can donate 0.1 engineers to work on php, if for no other reason than to make php better for their own use cases.

gchamonlive

9 hours ago

The mythical engineer-hour, has this ever worked? Maybe for an already stabilished dev team...

And asking harder? How does harder look like in comparison to regular asking?

hdjrudni

7 hours ago

I imagine it looks like Wikipedia. Every year they have a big campaign...

gchamonlive

5 hours ago

But Wikipedia their main product is the webpage, for PHP, people visit it and their docs occasionally, that sure wouldn't have the same impact.

Better than running on fumes would be to honourably phase out and give people time to move on.

ValentineC

8 hours ago

If Automattic funded the PHP Foundation with 8% of their revenue [1], like what Matt Mullenweg asked from companies using WordPress [2], the PHP Foundation would have lots of money.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Wordpress/comments/1g6qi8i/automatt...

[2] https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/12/automattic-planned-to-targ...

NewJazz

6 hours ago

He seriously asked for 8% of revenue? What a massive dolt. Most businesses don't even have a profit margin that high.

pamcake

7 hours ago

Heck, I imagine that 1% would still be a total game-changer.

grokys

10 hours ago

And then people complain about "bait and switch " or "pulling the rug" when an OSS project becomes successful and tries to fund itself in some way. "But that should be free" shouts everyone. I'm increasingly coming around to the idea that OSS was the biggest swindle the corporations managed to pull off.

acoustics

10 hours ago

I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't mind at all when an open source project switches licenses or whatever. They gave away the fruit of their labor, but I am not entitled to any more of it.

What does bother me is when the projects pivot to claiming that users now have a moral obligation to financially support the project. There is a kind of dishonesty in this move.

It's not that a successful project "should be free", it's that its success depended on it being free. If they had said all along that they'd eventually ask users to pay, that would be honest... but then they wouldn't have seen much of that adoption in the first place.

grokys

10 hours ago

In my case, I never intended on my open source project becoming popular, it just did and I had to either abandon it or make it my job. I'm not sure where that falls in your judgement.

I suspect this is also the case for PHP though.

acoustics

10 hours ago

It's your project, to the extent that you own the copyright. You are free to switch the license on your project, etc. If anyone tries to shame you for this, you should pay no mind. (Edited to add that you are also free to abandon it, and you could do that with a clear conscience.)

Likewise, users are free to continue using open source software without payment or donation, to fork the project, etc. If anyone tries to shame them for this, they should pay no mind.

carlosjobim

9 hours ago

Why would you have to abandon it instead of just keeping on in your preferred pace? If anybody wants more rapid development they can fork it, not your problem.

nicce

9 hours ago

Some people also have tried the paid new feature prioritization where it later lands for everyone. I think it worked in some projects but project must have been really good otherwise.

grokys

9 hours ago

I mean: who doesn't want to work full time on their passion project? Especially when I'd just been made redundant, I feel most people would do the same.

hdjrudni

7 hours ago

Full time on passion project only makes sense if you're also getting paid a decent salary. Full time for a bunch of free loaders does not make sense.

Also it gets less fun when people start making demands of you and you have to deal with taxes and all the unfun stuff.

bawolff

8 hours ago

> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't mind at all when an open source project switches licenses or whatever. They gave away the fruit of their labor, but I am not entitled to any more of it

It only bothers me when they try to claim their new license is open source or use misleading language when it isn't. Which seems to be what 90% companies doing that do.

People can do whatever they want with their intellectual property as long as they aren't lying about it.

anonymous908213

10 hours ago

I've been shouting this from the rooftops for ages now. OSS is a trojan horse, something meant to devalue the work of independent developers/small businesses and ensure that the only way the software can be supported is through the patronage of big tech, who earn the money to control such OSS through their unethical monopolistic practices. Look at the languages with funding, and where it comes from. C and C++ (both LLVM and GCC), C#, JS/TS, Java, Rust, Go, Python are all directly funded by big tech. The naive idealism results in everything falling into the hands of ~10 corporations plus some VCs who gamble on which ones will become worth acquiring by big tech, and then we wonder why everything goes to shit and our entire ecosystem is so user-hostile.

cedilla

9 hours ago

I'm not saying that big tech isn't hijacking open source software, but that does not mean that free or OSS was always "meant to devalue" devs or small companies.

Until very recently, big tech pumped untold millions of dollars into obliterating FLOSS altogether, calling it a cancer that will destroy any enterprise it touches.

anonymous908213

9 hours ago

You mean just Microsoft. Microsoft was an outlier. Even in the 90s, Linux and GCC were being funded by big tech. Obviously they were developed with the best of intentions, but I think it's accurate to say that OSS is "meant" to devalue developers because the purpose of a system is what it does, and that is what it does in practice.

engineerDave

8 hours ago

Or Oracle, Adobe, … it’s more than just Microsoft.

grokys

10 hours ago

And the indoctrination is so strong that even after all I've lived through and seen, my default is still "let's open source this".

eikenberry

9 hours ago

This is why Free Software is important. It is about a lot more than just being open source.

comment0r

2 hours ago

If Zig, which is much smaller than PHP, can attract a lot of money (relatively speaking, for its size): what is the PHP Foundation doing differently?

kyriakos

2 hours ago

If governments had to take down websites waiting for the patches this week then there are important users of php out there who have the money and should be contributing. I think php needs better public relations and people who can knock on the right doors to get funding.

sam_lowry_

11 hours ago

She says the full-time member is herself, and looking at her Linkedin (in/elizabethn) she isn't exactly the person who would patch PHP for the two CVEs.

londons_explore

10 hours ago

Presumably that's why there are also lots of part time contractors.

lwansbrough

11 hours ago

Just hold a public yes/no vote on changing licensing to something paid, and charge $10 to vote no.

IshKebab

10 hours ago

I imagine that would go down well and result in zero forks...

YetAnotherNick

10 hours ago

So you think those forks will solve underfunding problem?

lwansbrough

10 hours ago

Awesome dude let the scabs work for free lol

dingdingdang

11 hours ago

Come on Facebook/Zuckerberg, set them up with a structured fund that is invested in s&p500 or something equivalent/better and allows them to pay a handful of devs and a person to admin them (all surplus can be earmarked to go to charity to avoid the sinkhole of bureaucracy from a larger org). Would set the PHP Foundation up for life and the whole world would be better off as a result, smallish directed investment with huge payout from a value perspective.

abroszka33

10 hours ago

Not surprising at all. There are no incentives for anyone to contribute. And why would there be in this financial system?

rbanffy

10 hours ago

> There are no incentives for anyone to contribute

If you like PHP, you might want to contribute. I like tmux, for instance, and I contributed code to them. I did the same for Sysdig, and a couple other projects.

abroszka33

9 hours ago

I like a lot of things as well, yet I don't feel I can contribute after work. I already spend 8 to 10 hours at work. I can't find the motivation to do more.

abc42

9 hours ago

There are lots of drives besides greed.

abroszka33

9 hours ago

Of course there are. But do they matter in our current system?

bawolff

8 hours ago

And yet people do. PHP is a very active project.

Hamuko

11 hours ago

The solution is obvious: pour trillions of dollars into Anthropic and OpenAI, and security will trickle down.

markvdb

9 hours ago

First trickle down economics, now trickle down security!

bawolff

8 hours ago

unironically yes.

Security improved one blockbuster vuln at a time.

Closed source might have more money but they almost never invest it in security.

pmlnr

11 hours ago

xkcd 2347 again, what a surprise. Oh, wait, there's at least one paid person, that should be something /s

smashers1114

11 hours ago

Presumably it makes sense to sunset PHP especially with how cheap code migrations are nowadays.

anonymous908213

11 hours ago

Beating the dead horse, as you are: the Bun Rust migration cost millions of dollars in tokens and took an additional 3.5 months of labor after the widely-marketed "11-day rewrite" before being shipped as a release, and in the process introduced hundreds of new issues.

arctek

7 hours ago

Sure if you ignore the many governments around the world that use PHP, the (still) most popular blogging software (which also has several ecommerce solutions bolted on top), wikis. The list goes on.

A pet peeve of mine is when people offer simple solutions that are only simple by virtue of ignoring all use cases that don't matter to the author.

Every interconnected system of concerns has simple solutions when you reduce it down and ignore the ordered effects.

jmull

11 hours ago

What's easier, maintaining PHP or migrating/breaking every single PHP-based site?

And who's to say whatever sites are migrated to won't be "sunsetted" in a few decades too?

Seems like a no-brainer to maintain it.

smashers1114

10 hours ago

Of course it has to be maintained. Things are maintained as they are sunset.

jmull

9 hours ago

If maintenance continues indefinitely, then all good, (but then I wouldn’t use the term sunset).

glimshe

11 hours ago

How cheap are code migrations nowadays? Vibe-migrations, you mean?

whatthejesus

11 hours ago

Sounds like you’ve been snorting too much iron oxide.

rbanffy

10 hours ago

I agree a lot of PHP applications can be ported to other tools, but that only covers that much. Just look at banks and COBOL code.