privacyishuman
15 hours ago
>“Our country’s founders would be rolling over in their graves to learn that a pastime in which even George Washington partook, which is as American as apple pie and certainly a lot older, has quite absurdly been turned into a federal crime,” Alt said.
I'm convinced. And it's making me think anyone that disagrees hates apple pie and America.
chrisco255
15 hours ago
Or more appropriately, hates apple cider, which was the most common alcoholic beverage in Washington's era. Often homemade.
KPGv2
15 hours ago
apple cider isn't distilled, though; it's fermented
use yeast to convert sugars from apples into alcohol: fermentation
boil that until it becomes a concentrated liquor: distillation
distillation is significantly more dangerous than fermenting
NoGravitas
3 hours ago
Apple brandy and applejack are distilled from apple cider. Applejack is usually made with freeze distillation, which is perfectly safe. Simple alembic distillation is safer than some things you might already do in the kitchen, like pressure cooking.
red-iron-pine
5 hours ago
> distillation is significantly more dangerous than fermenting
it is not significantly more dangerous, and has been done for ages
chrisco255
15 hours ago
I get it, but apple pie isn't distilled either. Was just tying into something more thematically aligned. The law has nothing to do with danger, either, it seems to have been driven entirely by desire to protect federal tax revenue.
TIL: Apparently the nickname for distilled apple cider is applejack. Never realized the origin of the cereal's name.
KPGv2
15 hours ago
given how explosive ethanol is, i have no problem with the law persisting for public safety reasons even if they weren't originally penned for that reason
i really don't want to die because the downstairs neighbor wants to make his own craft vodka
mynameisash
2 hours ago
> i really don't want to die because the downstairs neighbor wants to make his own craft vodka
Without any snark or rudeness, your comment betrays how little you know about distilling.
I've been distilling liquor for probably 5+ years, and it's quite safe if you have any common sense. And the same comment could apply to brewing, canning, cooking, vehicle repair, skateboarding, etc.
iugtmkbdfil834
14 hours ago
The restrictions may be somewhat defensible in a tightly packed areas full of, shall we say, unwilling participants, but if I have a large property, why shouldn't I be able to do just that?
King-Aaron
14 hours ago
Forest fires
chrisco255
13 hours ago
There are about 1000 easier ways to start a forest fire than running a mini- distillery. Meanwhile if the local or state government wants to regulate safety requirements here, that is within their power to do so. Its the federal outright ban that is in question.
iugtmkbdfil834
14 hours ago
It is not a bad argument, but would apply it across all states without exception?
csdreamer7
13 hours ago
There is exception. The law specifically says you can get authorization from the Secretary of the Treasury. Likely so they can tax you-likely is not that different from commercial distillers.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5178
Considering the danger of distilling and most people do not have that much land; you likely would need to get approval from govt agencies anyway to be legal.
King-Aaron
14 hours ago
Oh look I'd wager more fires would be caused by people angle grinding in the summer (*there was a massive fire several years ago caused by this here in Perth), but I was just spitballing ideas. TBH I used to still my own liquor and think that if you're interested enough in the process to actually do it you're also probably aware of the safety aspects to it.
But also I do appreciate how many numbskulls there are out there.
cbfrench
7 hours ago
I grew up in moonshine country (or at least what was once moonshine country before they moved on to pot and then meth), and I never heard of a still causing a forest fire.
They’d occasionally go blind from methanol in the shine or slowly give themselves lead poisoning from the solder in the still, but no fires. So, they were at least safety-aware enough not to want to lose all their product and get the authorities on their case by burning down the area around their still.
iugtmkbdfil834
14 hours ago
Thank you. I know you have a point. I never did old fashioned distilling -- mostly because I am not sure I am anal enough to keep it clean and whatnot, but I can't say that the idea doesn't have charm.
fc417fc802
13 hours ago
> mostly because I am not sure I am anal enough to keep it clean and whatnot
Do you perhaps mean fermentation? Distillation is exceptionally easy and not particularly difficult to clean up after. It remains perfectly safe provided you have a cheap digital thermometer, understand the importance of good ventilation, and use off the shelf parts. (The latter only because a custom setup built by a particularly incompetent individual could inadvertently result in the creation of a dangerous pressure vessel.)
fc417fc802
14 hours ago
The same numbskulls that can purchase power tools at the local hardware store? Or drive a car? Distilling liquor is far safer than a great many common day to day activities.
King-Aaron
14 hours ago
I'm not really sure why you're trying to argue this to me, however there are some very serious risks to running a home still which shouldn't really be dismissed.
fc417fc802
14 hours ago
Because I'm responding to your comment in the context of a subtree where it was suggested that home distilling presented sufficient danger to give pause when considering the implications of repealing the ban on it. You yourself expressed such a sentiment. I'm merely pointing out the inconsistency of such a position with regard to the status quo. While it certainly carries risks, home distilling is far safer than a great many common day to day activities.
chrisco255
13 hours ago
Its very simple for states to pass safety regulations here. The federal outright ban is whats in question.
brainwad
15 hours ago
George Washington also made applejack (distilled from Apple cider). It was very popular in colonial America.
shevy-java
14 hours ago
Right, but distillation is a trivial task, just heat things up properly to their vaporization point. Why would it be forbidden?
AlecSchueler
14 hours ago
Are things normally forbidden based on their complexity?
tpm
9 hours ago
Distillation also concentrates the methanol, which can kill you. You have to know how to get rid of it (it has a bit lower boiling point), which makes it a non-trivial task with a significant downside. If you then sell the bad alcohol you've just made yourself a public health threat.
The way this is solved in our country is that you can legally make your own alcohol, but only at a state-approved distillery, where the personnel knows how to handle this.
red-iron-pine
5 hours ago
bollocks. the methanol exists in tiny quantities and has the lowest boiling point of basically anything in your booze.
you don't need "to know how to get rid of it" -- there are no skills needed: just pour it out.
you literally just pour out the first 0.5% of whatever comes out of the still. water it down heavily and flush it down the toilet or burn it or whatever. I literally just take the first ~25-50ml of liquid and ditch it -- problem solved.
all other nasty compounds have a very noticeable smell and are fairly easy to detect coming out of the still.
the "public health threat" is literally a prohibition scare-the-rubes meme.
steanne
15 hours ago
makes sense, apples used for pie are wasted when you could be making hooch with them
masklinn
15 hours ago
Historically non-edible apples (grown from seed, as well as dedicated cider apples) are widely available and only useful for cider, so it would be a waste of an edible apple to make cider out of it.
red-iron-pine
5 hours ago
you can only make and eat so many pies. if you've got a lot of apples they'll rot long before you're making food w/ them.
so cider them, and that'll stay stable for weeks / months. longer if cold and well stored.
"jack" it via freezing or distill it w/ boiling and the booze will stick around even longer
masklinn
5 minutes ago
There are many ways to preserve apples (sauces, jams, jellies, juices, canned slices, dehydrated, ...). Also the right varieties of apples ("winter apples") store fine for months, up to a year, in a cool and damp cellar.
And cooking and dessert apples don't make for great cider. While sugar is important (and cider apples can have more than dessert or cooking apples), tanins, acidity, and phenols are also very useful to cidermaking even though they make the apples themselves rather unpalatable.
friendzis
14 hours ago
In a country that has legalized (not even decriminalized!) marihuana, a still present full-ban on moonshine paints an interesting picture on legislative process
BobaFloutist
15 minutes ago
Even apart from you literally getting this wrong, while I don't care for weed, I find weed culture and smokers obnoxious, I still accept that weed is much less dangerous than moonshine.
iAMkenough
13 hours ago
Which country are you referring to?
In the U.S., heroin, LSD, and marijuana are the same federal schedule. Have to fill the for-profit prison labor camps somehow, and admitting dealing marijuana isn’t as dangerous as dealing heroin would put a dent in that. Leave that to the corporate opioid peddlers legally addicting Americans in pain.
https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/how-fda-failure...
yieldcrv
14 hours ago
Note: a think take ceo’s said that, not the justices like I had assumed
duped
14 hours ago
I mean whiskey was the first consumer good taxed by the nascent Constitutional republic during his administration and he had to put down a rebellion and federal regulation of distillation was a response to the long-tail impact of that rebellion and failure to enforce the taxation of whiskey and spirits.
Now I think it's dumb to prohibit home distillers and it actually inhibits industry evolution. There is a lot of experimentation that happens in grey areas of the law with homemade spirits and it would be interesting to see how things adapt if the law was lifted.
All that said home distillation is dangerous. Ethanol at volumes sufficient for bottling is explosive, methanol poisoning is real, and even if the techniques for safely distilling it from a mash are learned in a high school chemistry class most people aren't great at it.
I'm a big whiskey enjoyer and home cook and have done a few "dangerous" things myself w/ food and beverages. If the law goes away I know I'm going to do some stuff in the basement and accept the risk myself. But I'm a little wary of laws being lifted that definitely protect people, even if it's a side effect of taxation.
fc417fc802
14 hours ago
Such concern is inconsistent with the present reality. Gasoline for a lawnmower incorrectly stored in a garden shed or garage is explosive. The propane tank for the BBQ can easily destroy a chunk of you house if placed too close to an open flame. The OTC medication in your bathroom can also poison you if you're careless. There are many creative ways in which the electric supply of your home could result in your death if not treated with care. The examples are practically endless.
Even just a half decent kitchen knife will be razor sharp and capable of removing a digit or two if handled incorrectly.
duped
13 hours ago
Are you disagreeing that distilling several liters of cask strength grain alcohol around an open flame is more dangerous than sealed containers of propane and gasoline?
fc417fc802
11 hours ago
Yes. A sealed container of propane is _far_ more dangerous if we're purely considering what the typical failure mode looks like.
As to the gasoline, please do note that incompetent distilling was being compared to incompetent storage there. So then the gasoline hasn't been properly capped off and has been left in (for example) a garden shed with insufficient airflow. That's once again likely to be more dangerous.
Do also consider that people in the US regularly deep fry using a gas burner. It seems self evident to me that heating a vat of oil to near the smoke point and then making it sizzle, all the while over an open flame, has to be vastly more dangerous on average than what you described.
Also you don't necessarily need to use an open flame to distill. An electric range works perfectly well.
MentalM
14 hours ago
> All that said home distillation is dangerous
No, it is not. Not more dangerous than rice stir‑frying
> methanol poisoning is real
Ethanol is antidot. So again, your chances to severely poison yourself not much higher than if you instead of alcohol were doing Japanese cuisine.
fc417fc802
11 hours ago
It's not nearly as benign as you're making out. You can be poisoned by a contaminated batch - the ethanol content won't save you. However what is vastly overstated is the risk of such poisoning occurring in the first place. You could as well fear monger about the dangers of food poisoning due to incorrectly fermented kimchi or pickles or sauerkraut or what have you. Even more likely in the typical US kitchen is salmonella poisoning.
duped
13 hours ago
> Not more dangerous than rice stir‑frying
It's a lot easier to deal with a small grease fire than vaporized ethanol around an open flame.
> Ethanol is antidot. So again, your chances to severely poison yourself not much higher than if you instead of alcohol were doing Japanese cuisine.
Uh huh that's why all people blinded by bad moonshine are living healthy with full eyesight and no other negative affects, just like people that ate some bad fish
BenjiWiebe
an hour ago
Can you give an example of someone poisoned by methanol from home distilling, that wasn't a case of methanol adulteration?
fc417fc802
11 hours ago
You're spreading FUD and frankly have no idea what you're talking about. An ethanol vapor explosion will be brief and in most cases (unless you're extremely unlucky) will happen fairly early on in this scenario. The typical case will be a figurative flash in the pan that won't spread. The biggest concern is being burned, particularly your eyes.
Grease fires in comparison were one of the leading causes of house fires in the US the last time I checked. The worst case is getting splattered by burning droplets of oil that instantly scald any exposed skin while continuing to burn for long enough to light your clothing on fire. Personally I try to avoid pan frying on a range (as opposed to a dedicated appliance) and if I do I'm careful to verify the location of my fire blanket before starting.
Larrikin
14 hours ago
Did George Washington actually partake in the hobby or did he make his slaves do it like his famous barbecues until he died because he knew it was wrong?
Washington as an unquestioned justification for anything should never be the argument.
HlessClaudesman
14 hours ago
Nothing more American than poisoning yourself to save a buck.
soganess
13 hours ago
Yeah, same for working on your car when mechanics exist. Or building a computer when you can buy one. Or million other mildly dangerous things. I personally think anyone who plugs in a light bulb is playing Russian Roulette with their lives. Let's not get started on the weirdos who camp.
Some people just enjoying have hobbies; distilling hooch isn't on my bingo card, but it being illegal in the era of "we swear it's definitely not sports betting" is silly.
HlessClaudesman
5 hours ago
I guess the reason these laws exist is that in the aggregate everyone making their own booze does more harm than good.
But who am I to tell Chesterton where to put his fence. I guess every hundred years or so society needs to experience the thing for itself all over again.
BenjiWiebe
an hour ago
I believe the law was made because moonshiners didn't pay the alcohol tax.