mvkel
6 hours ago
I maintain that the entire event was to create a trail of evidence that justifies merging Tesla and SpaceX. No car will ever ship.
You can hear it in the voices of the creators, when they're giving an overview of the car to MotorWeek and other car media outlets. 99% focused on the rocket and battery tech/innovation, almost zero about the actual driving characteristics of the car, or that it -is- a car. Seems more like a rolling marketing mule.
vannevar
6 hours ago
The specs of the base (non-rocket-powered) car are pretty mediocre: RWD-only with 320 mile range. That's not terribly impressive in 2026, by 2028 it will be obsolete on delivery. The styling can charitably be described as generic. I agree, I don't think they have any intention of making this car.
HarHarVeryFunny
5 hours ago
To be fair the claimed ~1.6sec 0-60 acceleration speed is impressive - this is the benefit of electric - although if you have enough money you can already do that today in the way sexier looking Rimac Nevera R.
vannevar
3 hours ago
The new motor does seem like good tech. But not enough to overcome the other shortcomings, IMHO.
jacquesm
4 hours ago
Which in practice you will never ever do...
itbeho
3 hours ago
You're probably not a car enthusiast. Most people with performance cars love going 0-60mph, at least here in the USA.
jacquesm
3 hours ago
> You're probably not a car enthusiast.
That's your conclusion.
> Most people with performance cars love going 0-60mph, at least here in the USA.
I drive in traffic and I care a lot more about handling than I do about 0-60 which you rarely if ever will do without a car in front of you.
HarHarVeryFunny
4 hours ago
I guess you could rent a trace track to give it a try, but yeah ... Supercars are more for posing than being very practical. Bughatti Veyron tire life at top speed is 15 MINUTES.
skybrian
5 hours ago
How much electric sports car owners care about increasing range beyond 300 miles or so? It seems hard to believe that such a car would be obsolete.
vannevar
3 hours ago
You're right, this is a very fair point. But if you had a choice between two sports cars with similar performance specs and one had 400+ mile range, you'd probably be inclined to take that one, all else being equal. This is a highly optimized version of older battery technology, which will be even older by the time it goes to production; you'd think that a car with a rocket option would also include a cutting edge battery.
serf
4 hours ago
this is one point I agree on.
It's about right there with other sports cars rated ranges; 911/M4 get around 300-350 and the Corvette hits 400ish.
a road rally from LA to LV is 270ish miles. What else do you need a hyper-car-thing for?
Now we just need to get some goofy Musk tunnels involved so there's a reason to have the fan suction.
(aside from breaking the windows of traffic behind you with road debris)
angoragoats
3 hours ago
The original 2nd-gen Roadster reveal claimed a 200kwh battery pack and 600+ miles of range. There were analysts arguing at the time that the state of the art in battery tech could not possibly allow for that much capacity in that size car. This smacks of the same BS that happened with the Cybertruck — the originally announced range/pricing was far, far better than what actually shipped.
There should be legal investigations into this practice, because it’s extremely deceptive.
reitzensteinm
11 minutes ago
In a contemporary interview with Marques Brownlee, Musk said they didn’t currently have the technology and the specs were an extrapolation for what they expected to be available on release.
This isn’t a comment on your broader point.
angoragoats
3 minutes ago
> In a contemporary interview with Marques Brownlee, Musk said they didn’t currently have the technology and the specs were an extrapolation for what they expected to be available on release.
That’s even worse then, because it was supposed to be released by 2020. Here we are in 2026 and I still don’t think it’s possible to cram 200kwh into a sports car. I take this as an admission straight from the horse’s mouth that either: 1) they were lying and had no intention of shipping the car as specified when it was announced, or 2) they’re completely inept at making predictions about the trajectory of technology core to their products. Both are extremely bad.
andrewtbham
6 hours ago
100 percent agree... PR stunt to assist acquisition of Tesla so Musk can gain control of Tesla
jgalt212
5 hours ago
I assume you mean de facto and de jure.
7e
3 hours ago
Similar to the solar roof debacle when bailing out SolarCity.
dgellow
5 hours ago
Yeah, that’s also the conclusion I arrived to. It’s a clear step to justify the merger
andai
5 hours ago
If you will know them by their fruits, then the merger is objectively awesome.