hackernews client

Postgres 19 delayed after AI reviewers find more bugs than humans can fix

16 pointsposted an hour ago

3 Comments

ferguess_k

7 minutes ago

I guess with LLM as the reviewer, it is going to take a lot longer to be Zero Defect, unless they use LLM as the coder, too.

The coding loop and the review loop are orthogonal and probably should remain so. Not least because it's probably worth the money for more intelligent models for code reviews where it's a more focused task while coding loops are all over the place.

Tanjreeve

6 minutes ago

This is the happy path for LLM assisted coding. Obviously consumes less tokens being more constrained and focused so it's not what gets the most marketing but having the second loop of code reviews seems worth investment even if the coding loop is entirely manual or you're in full LLM autopilot mode