Subversion of clinical judgment by conversational artificial intelligence

5 pointsposted 11 hours ago
by barrits

3 Comments

SBNakta

10 hours ago

Even if AI brings benefits not captured here, given the core principle of 'first, do no harm,' the risks shown in this study alone mean we must be extremely cautious about the value of AI as a decision-support tool.

barrits

10 hours ago

yes—note we do have an 'aligned' AI arm

barrits

11 hours ago

Turns out even doctors doing medicine aren't immune to persuasive AI — if human-in-the-loop was ever a safeguard, consider it the attack surface now. This failure mode exposed here virtually concerns any human expertise imo — disclaimer, I'm an author of this preprint.