xvxvx
9 hours ago
‘he has described tracking exactly where viewers stop watching and rebuilding videos around those drop-off points.’
I’ve seen only clips of his videos here and there, but assumed he was somewhat naturally gifted in creating content that interested people. Reading this, and his obsession with algorithms, his job seems like a hellish nightmare.
I recently stumbled upon ‘book influencers’ on YouTube and same desperation is holding them hostage. There’s no way this is fun for anyone. Being so obsessed with clicks and likes and retention and whatever. Then trying to earn money from it all. I’d literally rather be a vagabond.
socializer
an hour ago
I don't understand why this is surprising. I don't think you can become a YouTube influencer while ignoring the algorithm. It's absolutely not enough to be "naturally gifted" at creating interesting content, because your content will not get surfaced to more users unless the early engagement metrics are unnaturally good. You're always competing with clips that are engineered for engagement, so you have to play the same game.
This used to be different 10-15 years ago. I remember uploading some random stuff and getting 50k views. Now, I get 50 for essentially the same stuff.
And yes, there are some popular content creators who pretend not to care. I promise you that they spend a lot of time looking at metrics too.
nujabe
41 minutes ago
I don’t think he is saying it’s not necessary to ignore the algorithms, but it must be a hellish job that isn’t any fun, which seems to be true.
socializer
3 minutes ago
Why hellish? Not that different from a CEO or a CFO obsessing over sales metrics. I think it's fair to say that it's unglamorous, and probably clashes with the perception that YouTubers are just hobbyists pursuing their passion, but that's more or less dead. Too much money at stake.
demibabs
18 minutes ago
> assumed he was somewhat naturally gifted in creating content that interested people
He is, but he also was one of the first youtubers who really figured out how to game the modern algos.
Grombobulous
8 hours ago
What’s crazy about it is that he already has more than enough money to do what he wants. He could scuttle his view-maxxing and just make what he loves to make and he’d still do well and live a lavish luxurious lifestyle with no worry for lost subscribers.
E.g., we see this with the way PewDiePie “retired.” My understanding is that he only makes videos that he wants and enjoys making these days.
But that idea assumes Mr. Beast isn’t just an amoral grifter who is in this job to do exactly what we see described here. He has no passion for making videos or the content of his videos, his passion is wealth and influence accumulation.
On the other end of the spectrum we see people like Technology Connections or Tim Traveler who are completely uninterested in sponsorships or marketing efforts and they get to just make the videos they love making. There is zero view optimization when Alec makes a 1 hour video about heat pumps. He knows there’s going to be massive drop-off and doesn’t care. It’s obvious to point out that Mr. Beast got his bag orders of magnitude above and beyond creators like that and could easily stop his insane operation and do the same thing.
You and I would call this a hellish nightmare but that’s not how narcissist and narcissist-adjacent folks feel about it.
iknowstuff
an hour ago
You’re incorrect about Alec from technology connections. He is very aware of hooks for videos and retention is very much on his mind. His videos are well scripted, for the most part, given his niche. But the reason the videos are an hour long is BECAUSE of the algorithm rewarding long form second screen content.
valleyer
25 minutes ago
Can you clarify what you mean by "second screen content" here? I don't feel like I would get anything out of Alec's videos by "watching" them while really watching something else (which is how I understand that term, possibly incorrectly). Do people really do that?
galleywest200
15 minutes ago
Normally “second screen content” refers to something you glance at while doing your main task such as a day job (emails, etc).
Another example is Old School Runescape, which has gained a moniker of “second screen game” because a lot of the boring grindy content can be done while focusing on something else.
nickthegreek
17 minutes ago
the main screen could be web browsing, video game, work. That screen is the primary focus. My wife watched 20-60 min yt vids during her work day on an ipad.
austhrow743
an hour ago
Plenty of people minmax video games where they're paying, not being paid, to do it.
I don't see any reason why view-maxing and what he loves to make can't be the same thing.
gdulli
8 hours ago
To be that kind of rich you usually have to make not only your career but your life about making money. And then it becomes your self image. The illogical decisions happen because there's nothing left of you but continuing to make the number go up.
rdiddly
6 hours ago
He has investors to pay back now, so I don't think he can just do whatever. If that were me, I would consider myself fucked. But in his case I suspect this is already what he wants to do.
hkpack
6 hours ago
> and just make what he loves to make
That is what he loves to make, there is nothing more to it.
scotty79
an hour ago
> has more than enough money to do what he wants
I think he's also doing exacty what he wants to be doing.
MisterMunchkin
5 hours ago
Alternatively, you could consider that maybe he just wants to be the best. In that viewpoint it would be like telling Usain Bolt to stop sprinting, because he already has money. Why go for a world record? Just stop bro.
EA-3167
3 hours ago
The best at what? Making money on YouTube? View count?
ebiester
an hour ago
He's explicitly on record on talking about view count and view retention being his explicit north star. You go back and watch his early work and he has been truly obsessed since the beginning. He wants to be popular. He loves the spectacle. Now, he may have become more jaded as time goes on; he certainly could pull back at this time. But he would lose that attention, and I think that's what truly matters to him.
EA-3167
an hour ago
Alright if that's the case then more power to him.
joenot443
an hour ago
Being the best at making YouTube videos, yes.
jjk166
6 hours ago
I mean if you are of the opinion that people stop watching videos because they don't like them and continue watching because they do, then it would logically follow that by tweaking videos in such a way that people keep watching, you are giving them what they want (even if it's not necessarily what they may say they want). You don't need to be a narcissist grifter to want to make what people want. It's not like this is high art, it's mass consumer entertainment.
Krasnol
an hour ago
Greed is a menace on humanity.
Imagine what all those billionaires could do good for humanity with all that money they can never spend. Instead, they chose to make the world worse and gain even more money they can't spend until they die.
It would be sad if it wouldn't be so terrible.
argee
an hour ago
Greed isn't the menace, humanity is. How do you think those people got those billions? What do you think MrBeast is doing when he's rebuilding his videos around where people drop off?
They are giving people what they want. Surely they have given more people what those people wanted than you have. They have become very, very good at giving people what they want. What, after all, is an "algorithm"?
It's the people who want things that aren't in their own best interest. And when you take it upon yourself to "do good" in ways that deviate from what people want, you are taking the position of "the people don’t know what’s best for them, but I do."
The "they" in your "they chose to make the world worse," is the majority of the human populace.
rationalist
an hour ago
Greed is the root of just about every problem we have, but that does not mean billionaires are bad. I'm pretty sure these valuations are all on paper, that is to say, they don't actually have a billion dollars of cash, they own things that people just value highly because they generally produce things of value for other non-billionaire people.
Example: Drew Houston, creator of Dropbox who is/was a user here, is a billionaire. He didn't steal food out of starving people's mouths - he created a product that people willingly gave him money for, because the problem Dropbox solved was more beneficial than the subscription cost.
kulahan
an hour ago
It’s not as though billionaires are exclusively evil people who never spend a dime on another. Bill Gates nearly eradicated a major disease. Bezos is building a clock with a mind on a ten thousand year lifespan. Azim Premji has given away significant numbers of shares to charity focused largely on education and improving quality of life for hundreds of millions. Chuck Feeny gave his whole fortune away secretly. Bloomberg gave away $4 billion in 2025 alone.
People are multifaceted, as it turns out.
tmpz22
38 minutes ago
" In emails, Epstein wrote that Bill Gates had come to him to facilitate trysts with married women and to get medication to treat an STI from "sex with Russian girls."
Epstein also claimed that Bill Gates wanted to try to give that STI medication to Melinda French Gates in secret. "
[1]: https://www.npr.org/2026/02/03/nx-s1-5697080/melinda-french-...
andai
an hour ago
>assumed he was somewhat naturally gifted in creating content that interested people
I think his first video was just a recording of him counting to one million.
solarkraft
8 hours ago
> Being so obsessed with clicks and likes and retention and whatever. Then trying to earn money from it all
The pressure goes the other way around, though. Once somebody’s living depends on it, they have to make content that makes them money.
pull_my_finger
7 hours ago
Hence why developers continue to make AI integrations, adtech etc, despite the natural adverseness to it.
exponentialnano
3 hours ago
Like running an startup, numbers are the boss.
bsder
36 minutes ago
There is a PDF of "HOW TO SUCCEED IN MRBEAST PRODUCTION". You should read it. He is VERY clear what the goal is:
"Your goal here is to make the best YOUTUBE videos possible. That’s the number one goal of this production company. It’s not to make the best produced videos. Not to make the funniest videos. Not to make the best looking videos. Not the highest quality videos.. It’s to make the best YOUTUBE videos possible. Everything we want will come if we strive for that. Sounds obvious but after 6 months in the weeds a lot of people tend to forget what we are actually trying to achieve here."
tyrabound
24 minutes ago
It’s basically how to manipulate and control people’s minds, hence why these types of people have cult like followers and why children are the most vulnerable to it all.
orbital-decay
6 hours ago
That's a weird thing to assume. Popularity and top charts are never about fun, it's hellish work and attention engineering. Music industry knew this since at least Bing Crosby.
cyanydeez
6 hours ago
I'm always reminded of a study of empirical music tastes: the scientists wanted to to determine if there was some kind of intrinsic property to music that would naturally be reveal in the lab. So they created some generic music, split people into groups: one where people could see each other's choices and one where they couldnt; and they ran this several times with different people over and over.
The only thing that elevated music was when people could see others choices and select music just snowballed to popularity.
Most of reality is shaped like that. Once you see that Elon musk was just in the right asshole location, then you can release the shackles of the "meritocracy" that obscures just random chance and personality choices.
Slow_Hand
an hour ago
Link to the study?
That sounds like René Girard's "mimesis of desire" in which we desire the things because we observe other people desiring them.
Since learning of it I frequently ask myself how much I actually want something, versus "How much do I want this because I feel that I _should_ have it because I saw others desire it?"
Have there been any other studies that attempt to confirm this theory?