More benchmarks comparing effectiveness of various AI SREs is welcome and overdue: especially vendor-vs-vendor comparisons. One area that I think is going to be really interesting and important is the best way to emulate complex IT environments for evals.

Some related work I recommend checking out: - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33023 (new last week!) - https://github.com/SREGym/SREGym - https://github.com/hyperdxio/hyperdx/tree/main/packages/hdx-... (Clickstack's version) - https://github.com/grafana/o11y-bench (Grafana's version)

Cool that you guys created this, but interpreting the results: why wouldn't I just use Claude instead of an AI SRE tool?

Or if there are some features of an AI SRE tool that make it better than Claude + some MCPs, should those be captured in this same benchmark?

Cool, as I see your product react proactively rather than Claude being reactive so that with your tools automated investigations happens without me asking explicitly the problem and root cause as I understand? Do you guys also have mitigations?

How much time did it take to build this? Loved it! What problem does this solve?

Emrah, it seems that EDX does not offer any edge over GCX, when paired with an agent like Claude?

[flagged]