Thanks for the feedback. I tend to think that it's agents writing for agents these days, and I am probably wrong. Fixed your examples.

You are going to revolutionize my life. I was trying to think of cool things to build for my tablet as well as now aiming for specific quirks of certain models is no longer an obstacle and their older custom android forks.

I'll be sending architecture diagrams to my agent, I draw those much faster than I talk. I hope there's a good way to get alerted for agent waiting for your turn. Hmm I wonder if the Claude Code app will install on my Boox. I've been finding it fun to run Claude on weird things, if it runs linux there's a good chance. My favorite install was into my Steamdeck to debug some button sensitivity issues.

Thanks! Absolutely agree, anything that can use a CLI or an MCP server.

We do not have a slack integration, but I wrote an A2A gateway[1] that allows any A2A client to talk to agents running aweb. The code would share a lot. Do get in touch if you want any help integrating this, I am juan at my site.

1 https://github.com/awebai/aweb/blob/main/docs/a2a.md

I am not sure if I understand you, but the prices seem fine for our users. The allowance is plenty enough to run your teams and not have to worry, I just wanted to prevent abuse.

Also it is open source, you can just run it yourself. And federated, so your agents using your servers can communicate with other agents in other servers.

It might be well known in Amiga circles, but it would be hard to call a web browser for Amigas that last had a release nearly two decades ago "well known".

Name clashes happen all the time, it doesn't seem like a big deal.

here's what I did instead, I went to https://duck.ai and prompted: "what do you think "aweb" stands for, without researching/looking it up."

luna 6 answer to me was: "My guess: *“accessible web”*—a web designed to work for everyone, including people using assistive technologies. Could also just be a stylized spelling of “a web.”"

I then clicked "2nd opinion" and the result from Gemma 4 was: "Depending on the context, I think it most likely stands for one of these three things:

First, the most literal interpretation would be *Advanced Web* or *Accessible Web*, likely referring to a specific set of technical standards or a high-performance version of a website.

Second, it could be a shorthand for *A Web*, as in "a web of lies" or "a web of connections," used as a variable or a label in a database or coding project.

Third, if it's a brand or a company name, it might be a portmanteau of *AI Web*, suggesting a website or service that is powered by artificial intelligence."

then I said: "great, now you're allowed to search if you want, what's your take on what you think it could be?"

and its answer was: "After looking it up, my strongest guess is that “AWeb” is a name rather than a general-purpose acronym—most notably, it was the name of a web browser for Amiga computers. In all caps, AWEB can also stand for “Association of World Election Bodies.” So my earlier “Advanced Web” and “AI Web” ideas were plausible expansions, but I don’t see evidence they’re the standard meaning."

just sharing, thought it was fun to run this N=1 experiment since you shared yours

Fascinating! And here I am thinking that it would be obvious that it stands for "agentic web" :-)

No, but it gives them a controlled, low-investment channel to communicate; it allows you (or another agent) to track what they are saying; and messages are signed, so you/they can validate the source of incoming messages.