iPod of 2026

38 pointsposted 7 hours ago
by kapsteur

64 Comments

frio

5 hours ago

What does this offer over, say, an Innioasis https://www.innioasis.com/products/y2? What Bluetooth codecs does it support; will I be able to use LDAC/LDHC/AAC/AptX HD/etc.? Is "Sudo OS" something I can hack and play with?

9999gold

5 hours ago

It says it supports "streaming" but it is unclear if it will support streaming apps like Spotify/Apple Music or their own music streaming service.

coldtea

5 hours ago

Shipping Q4 2027? Let me know then. Even if it ships on time, that's like a year ahead, and who knows what else will be available by the time (it's not like there's not a thriving niche mp3 player market).

sippingabonedry

5 hours ago

While you're saving that $250 over the next year, feel free to indulge on any of the dozens of equivalent products already on the market at the $35 price point.

coldtea

3 hours ago

I know of them, but I don't necessarily want to save. I don't like the sub-$50 ones I've seen (tons of them on Alibaba, Temu, Amazon and various online stores). Already have a ~ $150 mp3 player.

I'd be interested in a $250 one or even a $400 one if it had good features. 64GB storage (SD extention is cool, but built-in should be way higher) and 20 hours battery ain't that. No mention of the DAC and headphone specs are a joke. 3.5mm? For $250 I want a 1/4-inch jack for hi-fi headphones as well...

thejazzman

5 hours ago

I recommend an iPod classic with a 512GB SD card :D

user

5 hours ago

[deleted]

shosko

5 hours ago

This feels like a new company trying to capitalize on the trend and looking to fill a minimum order.

nticompass

7 hours ago

Reminds me of the Tangara mp3 player: https://cooltech.zone/tangara/

My friend got a Tangara from their "Kickstarter" and I think it's pretty cool. Plus it's open source and you can just make your own.

summermusic

5 hours ago

+1 for Tangara. It's kind of underpowered and crashes sometimes when doing too much at once, and I wish the scroll wheel felt a bit better, but hey it's all open source and I made some mods (printed a case, added some resistors to lower the noise floor).

bpye

5 hours ago

I do like my Tangara, though I use an ancient Sansa Clip more just because it's so much smaller.

frio

5 hours ago

I'd love a Tangara, it's a pity they can't be ordered any more.

rock_artist

5 hours ago

Maybe it’s me being old but I don’t understand why I’d want this device for 249$.

I know some younger gens are looking for phoneless experiences, but for that price you can find old devices and simply recycle their usage. There are enough roms aimed and making a “dumb” mp3 player and include 3.5” and decent audio.

So I wonder if I miss something. The fomo here is messing with me.

poisonborz

5 hours ago

Even more, chinese sites are chuck full of such players for a fraction of the price in all dimensions, on/offline, tactile or touch, with quality DACs.

xandrius

5 hours ago

Yep, just get some older mp3 players and done. No need dumb touch screens.

moralestapia

5 hours ago

Maybe it's me being old but I've seen the <who would buy this thing> argument ad nauseaum.

I'm happy about this product, I was just looking for something like this not long ago.

There's market for everything. Accept that and move on, particularly when you have no horse on the race.

coldtea

3 hours ago

>I'm happy about this product, I was just looking for something like this not long ago.

There is a market for such products, but not for this one, which is a particularly bad implementation, vaporware for Q4 2027 release, and with bad specs for the price.

Tons of such mp3 players, with touchscreens, and even iPod like wheels, on online stores. Go get one.

nxc18

5 hours ago

You can also just buy an iPod in 2026, they are still well supported on Mac and PC. You can get them with new batteries quite cheaply. You can even get 30-pin Bluetooth adapters for them.

emigre

5 hours ago

The iPod aren’t supported anymore, they require iTunes which is no longer available on macOS. And iTunes is also not available for Linux.

bookstore-romeo

5 hours ago

you can still sync music to iPods using the music app/the finder on mac [0]. there’s a similar thing for windows as well [1]. on linux, i know the clementine music player supports iPod sync [2]. all these options let you use the original firmware!

0: https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/mac-help/mchlde9a31f1/...

1: https://support.apple.com/en-ca/guide/devices-windows/mchlbf...

2: https://github.com/clementine-player/Clementine/wiki/Portabl...

emigre

3 hours ago

Well, the support link says iPod Touch, that’s not all iPods. I was thinking about older models to be honest.

I’ve been told in another comment that they still sync, via Finder. I have had issues with that, but it’s probably okay from what other comments say.

I’ve done an online search and I see other people that have had technical issues syncing with Finder. I guess it depends on the macOS version, iPod model… who knows.

I’ve used Clementine but found it to be clunky and unreliable. Again, just my personal experience with it.

mingus88

2 hours ago

Classic iPods work the same way

absolute8606

5 hours ago

It is actually still supported directly Finder on macOS. Or, even better, just putting Rockbox on them and copying files over directly, and that’s well supported in Linux.

Pricing on the used market is maybe a bit high compared to some of the other options out there but the hardware still feels great and there’s massive aftermarket support so there are still benefits to an iPod.

emigre

3 hours ago

To be honest I like the classic UI and would not want to use Rockbox… I have struggled trying to use it with Linux. There are ways, in theory, but actually was a pain in practice. I’ve been told Finder works fine, if that’s the case then that’s great.

reaperducer

4 hours ago

The iPod aren’t supported anymore, they require iTunes which is no longer available on macOS.

Absolutely false. Why would you even post that?

iPods are 100% supported on macOS, and its Music program.

I have five Shuffles, and an iPod Video, and I use at least one of them almost every day, and sync them with my Macs monthly.

emigre

3 hours ago

It’s true that after iTunes ceased to exist it was then possible to sync them with the Music app and Finder, I was wrong to say that. I meant to say that Apple no longer offers support for the device.

I have had issues syncing with Finder on a particular model. I assumed these models no longer worked with the OS. Happy to hear that they do. Maybe it was the OS version, or the model. I should try again.

pwthornton

5 hours ago

It doesn't seem to list what it supports. How do I get music on here? What kind of codecs are supported?

fg137

5 hours ago

This thing reads like a Kickstarter.

coldtea

3 hours ago

Reads like an AI vibe slop version of a Kickstarter.

zylent

5 hours ago

I try not to be negative, but the name is bad. Literally any other name. sudo os?!?

emigre

3 hours ago

Oh gosh, “sudo”… because if you use it you are a “super user”?… Not a great name.

rsync

5 hours ago

I use and maintain an "ipod" in the form of an old pixel 3 with 128 GB of memory that has no SIM card and no software installed except for VLC.

It stays in airplane mode. It has a real headphone jack.

comrade1234

5 hours ago

I still have an iPod in my car and I still have a big collection of music but I've stopped collecting music. I haven't bought/downloaded anything in years because there is so much good streaming out there. I mostly switch between nts.live 1 and 2, dublab, and dublab Germany. When there's something annoying on one channel there is almost always something good on another.

sajithdilshan

5 hours ago

Looks like a scam. You have to pay 50$ to reserve and ships in Q4 2027.

By then most of people would forget they even paid for this and also you won’t be able to dispute the 50$ with your payment provider because the dispute window has passed.

shosko

5 hours ago

This feels like a new company collecting orders for a minimum run. I wish them luck. Those rivets on the back are a deal breaker for me.

maxglute

4 hours ago

Looks massive and 20hours of battery life. Does 3.5 even have a dac?

mingus88

2 hours ago

It would have to if it makes (analog) sound waves from (digital) files

Aboutplants

5 hours ago

Just use an old iPhone as your music player. You probably have one in a drawer somewhere

wpearse

5 hours ago

Jokes: I have one in my pocket right now!

meerita

5 hours ago

One the picture depicts a really fat device. Feels like you will have a brick in your hand.

zokier

5 hours ago

its probably just ai slop picture. the specs list thickness as 8.5mm, which is less than e.g. iphone 4s.

uyui

5 hours ago

There already is Shanling Q2 which looks like iPod, but also has lossless.

jerrygenser

6 hours ago

ipod of 2026 ships q4 2027.. is that a typo on the shipping date?

mococa

5 hours ago

Nice, I was just searching for something like that!

uyui

5 hours ago

THere's already a player that looks like classic iPod and even supports loseless playback out this year, Shanling Q2.

chinathrow

5 hours ago

This is all nice but, aren't there patents on some of the features visible?

saulpw

5 hours ago

Why are you spending any of your precious energy defending expired patents for a trillion-dollar corporation?

petcat

5 hours ago

Because before I click the "Reserve" button I would like to know if this company has any hope in hell to actually ship a device before they are sued into oblivion. I don't like wasting money.

sandcat_

5 hours ago

They’re probably questioning the viability of a product that’s accepting preorders?

mschuster91

5 hours ago

The original iPod came out in 2001. Any patents on that have hopefully expired at least half a decade ago if not earlier.

chollida1

5 hours ago

I though $50 seems like a fair price for what you'd get. And then I saw it was only a deposit. A retail price of $250 seems way over the mark for what it is.

Who would be the market for this product?

Its expensive so its up market, but all of those buyers would already have phones and would be unlikely to bring another device just to have music that their phone is already exceptionally good at providing.

it's unlikely to be runners or bikers or other endurance athletes as they'll already have their phone or if they use a watch have music on their watch so they don't have to bring a phone.

Phones already do a great job of offline with downloaded music and movies so that doesn't seem like the right crowd.

Most kids get a hand me down phone with no cellular to start with from their parents so that doesn't seem like a good fit.

now i feel like I'm writing the hacker news dropbox review where i say its use case is already easy to do and the product will go nowhere;)

But seriously, who would be the target here?

emigre

5 hours ago

Hi. I am the target for this kind of device. I like to have a dedicated music player, and I like the shape of the iPod classic. I don’t want to use a smartphone.

This device has Bluetooth which the old iPod did not have, which is an enhancement. The old iPod also forces you to sync the music using the iTunes library.

cesarsk

5 hours ago

Nostalgia? Maybe not even, as you could buy a second hand iPod off eBay. Maybe for people that only use dumbphones and want still the possibility of listening to music?

Curious to see how much they sell, I suspect not much

coldtea

5 hours ago

>A retail price of $250 seems way over the mark for what it is.

There are, in 2026, dozens of models of mp3 players selling from around $120 to even up to $400 or so, from brands from Chinese OEMs to Sony, including a few that mimic the iPod interface. From iPod style to expensive DAC ones with impendance tailored to high end headphones.

>But seriously, who would be the target here?

People interested in mp3 players.

People who want to focus on music listening, and not have a constant distraction device at hand when doing it.

>Phones already do a great job of offline with downloaded music and movies so that doesn't seem like the right crowd.

Seems like you've missed the whole "back to focused use device" trend going on for the last few years and that general niche.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00lLrwHQPns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaTRhWazMPs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFVo1bmUXzw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viU9JhIsbl4

https://www.audiophileon.com/news/hd-music-player-top-10

https://www.whathifi.com/best-buys/portable/best-portable-mu...

https://www.techradar.com/news/best-mp3-players-techradars-g...

functionmouse

7 hours ago

What DAC/amplification circuitry does it use? Does it support bit perfect playback the same way my iPod/sansa clip/computer do? Or is everything crushed to 48khz like a smartphone?

Why does it appear to be riveted together? Wouldn't Phillips screws or a snap together design (guitar pick to open) be more practical?

Is "Sudo OS" a euphemism for "Android but extra locked down", the same way Rabbit R1 was?

7bbfea

6 hours ago

Asking the important questions. At its core it's a DAP. If it offers nothing better than a smartphone, I don't see why I need another piece of glued together junk that could go unsupported anytime just for whatever sentimental value iPod has. Not to mention 64 GB is nothing if you're listening to lossless.

DaveSchmindel

5 hours ago

^^^ This. I would urge anyone who got tangentially excited about this whole thread to:

1. head to eBay and search for used iPod Classics

2. give Rockbox some love

gbalint

5 hours ago

It has a microsd slot, so I don't think the 64 GB limitation is that bad.

user

5 hours ago

[deleted]

llm_nerd

5 hours ago

I suspect they're all just renderings and they didn't want to commit to a drive type.

As to the being "crushed" to 48Khz, there is zero chance you can tell the difference.

https://xiph.org/video/vid2.shtml

MarvinYork

5 hours ago

At first, I read “Suno” and thought it was a music player that lets you listen to music generated just for you. “Play me some music about a breakup between two sailors,” and there you go — the perfect album for the occasion.