simonw
10 hours ago
I'm confused.
The numbers that Reuters describe in this article were entirely for 2025.
It's been well documented that Anthropic's revenue growth in 2026 has been enormous. This was the year of coding agents, and tokenmaxxing, and companies blowing enormous amounts of money on AI thanks to coding agent users spending hundreds (or thousands) of dollars a day.
Given that, I don't understand why the article and the headline are based exclusively on those 2025 numbers, with not so much as a hint to the reader that there are figures from the past 9 months that aren't covered by the documents Reuters saw.
Losing $8bn in 2025 isn't particularly notable if you've made ~10x that amount of revenue in 2026.
(How much did they lose in 2026? Wouldn't we love to know that!)
Is this just a thing with leaked IPO prospectuses and coverage of them?
Betelbuddy
an hour ago
You know the losses increased even more massively or Anthropic itself would have leaked the number already...
Most interesting: "Anthropic said nearly a quarter of its revenue came from two customers last year, and as part of its risk factors, warned that many of its largest clients were not locked into long-term contracts and could cut or stop spending."
TheqO
3 hours ago
>It's been well documented that Anthropic's revenue growth in 2026 has been enormous.
Has it? Don't they just self-leak/press release 'ARR' revenue claims? Has there been any audited and formal filings? Including all the off-balance sheet and other creative stuffblitzar
3 hours ago
Trust me bro ... enormous ... and we are going to destroy the human race too.
KellyCriterion
26 minutes ago
...definitely!
snorrah
2 hours ago
Simon you're really going to need to float the numbers for us if you're going to make claims about enormous revenue. And don't forget to include things like cost of revenue as well !
gniv
an hour ago
That was my question too. 2025 is really old in AI-company time. But I'm suspecting the "leak" was on purpose so they can now come and show how much better (but still not great) the first half of 2026 was.
camdenreslink
9 hours ago
Presumably the expenses would also be higher in 2026 as well, because inference costs scale with usage and I think training their new large models would be in there as well.
janderson215
7 hours ago
I’m not sure “presumption” is a valid methodology to evaluate a company’s performance.
mike_hearn
2 hours ago
That's not a presumption, he was just being polite. It is guaranteed that inference costs increased. Unless you believe that model efficiency improvements were able to offset the entire growth of agent usage in this year, which I suppose is technically possible although it would be a truly remarkable achievement.
081c28a92
7 hours ago
What methodology would you propose given the available information?
janderson215
3 hours ago
Gather more information before coming to a conclusion. Otherwise, do not jump to a conclusion prematurely.
user
9 hours ago
fr2029
9 hours ago
[dead]
sensanaty
an hour ago
> It's been well documented that Anthropic's revenue growth in 2026 has been enormous.
By whom, exactly?
herunan
8 hours ago
Reuters probably saving 2026 for another writeup. To be honest, this is nothing surprising for 2025. I think we all expected unsurmountable costs. AI has always been and still is a huge bet into the future. The future is not written.
wmf
9 hours ago
Not including Q1 and Q2 numbers sounds like a hit piece.
user
4 hours ago