3 days ago
Have only seen Chinese language or Chinese-related explanations. I am not a mathematician. But the case for multiples of 4 is at a junior IMO level (number theory) and, I agree, does seem to demonstrate "insight".
https://eu.36kr.com/en/p/3992525310802946 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AplpSdUub5s
4 days ago
Genuinely have never heard of this Liousville version, and cannot find any mention of it outside of articles written in the last few days about this proof.
4 days ago
I found these from 2024:
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.17199
- https://academic.oup.com/imrn/article/2024/16/11865/7704606
4 days ago
Thanks. I couldn't find anything in literature suggesting this case was previously worked on. I'm also a pure math PhD candidate so I guess I'm just coping..
4 days ago
4 days ago
O Lord, the next wave of desperation, now they all have to "solve" some challenging math problem.
Can't wait to see how late to the party Google is with this one later on. Lol
4 days ago
I mean... Google started the party. But the biggest and most famous problem solved so far was done by one of openai's so they aren't jumping on the bandwagon by doing it again. And also this isn't openai doing it, just someone using one of their models.