Fair point. English isn’t my first language, so I run my writing through tools to polish it. I probably leaned too hard into making this one auditable. The research and conclusions are mine, but yeah, it reads more like a technical report than a blog post.

Yeah, it's exhausting.

> "The next two experiments look like a clean A/B test. They are not."

It turns out a lot of the value is in the agent being able to stitch together pre-existing tools. I, too, have a personal agent but my friends using Muse or Instinct approach the functionality I use mine for quite easily.

The insight that enables this is a sophisticated coder can build tools an unsophisticated assistant can use. So our hosted model isn’t as smart but executes at 100+ tok/s single stream across 8 streams on our local hardware at frontier level.

But the code Fable provides is much better. The unsophisticated guy can build little tools but self-modification leads to a tower of cards.

I sort of understand DSH arch, and their choices, but still baffled by why you would want the agent to change its own agent loop other than the system prompt (in that extension, memory / soul / tools / skills).

[dead]