I think my counter is relatively straightforward. Economists have said that as of more or less today there has been zero impact from AI. Despite layoffs in tech. I don’t think we go from “no economic impact” to end of humanity in “the next few years”.

Sorry, wrong link: https://xcancel.com/Marcus_J_W/status/2098078076299366684

Unless this happens via nuclear annihilation not a chance.

Have these people ever left their bubble? In sane parts of reality barely anything has actually changed except some people are dumber because they use ChatGPT for absolutely everything.

Oh and restaurant menus are fugly now.

Do any of these people have kids?

Honest question, what are average joes supposed to do? We have no control here. This incessant messaging is going to inspire genuine chaos. What are young adults and parents of young kids supposed to do other than panic?

We’ve abandoned religion and adopted tech consumerism as our new pseudo religion. Is Kubrick our prophet, and 2001 our prophesy?

Possibly, but more likely because of the ravaging weather events as gas powered data centers churn out more emissions in four years than the last fourty

>Unless there is AI regulation or a coordinated slowdown between labs, human extinction in the next few years seems very likely

Sigh, no explanation of how this would occur (even after multiple questions on that thread).

It's starting to sound like hot air and frankly tiresome. I want data worksheets.

It is bullsh*t.

Just say that you need the IPO money to build yourself a bunker.

If it was a true danger, then instead you would have supported pausing AI and an international governing body to halt the development globally (including China) right now.

But you didn't. Because someone needs to complete their grift first before dumping shares on retail investors.

[dead]