4 hours ago
FTA:
> “I work with Flock Safety. And I called originally because I’m getting followed,” the installer can be heard telling a dispatcher in the recording of the call obtained by Atlanta News First Investigates. “I was getting harassed, pretty much. Taking videos and pictures. And now, the same vehicle that pulled over where I was working at has been following me.”
…the irony
4 hours ago
I like to ask people who are pro blanket surveillance if they’d be ok with the police putting an Air Tag in their car
10 hours ago
So they can film you but you can't film them?
Double standard much?
9 hours ago
Yep they hate having a camera in their face, how ironic
9 hours ago
I despise Flock. Have had plenty to say. But I suspect -this- was the reason, moreso than the filming the installation:
> As Keefe began to shoot video, the installer saw him and immediately packed up his equipment and drove away, so Keefe also returned to his car and followed several cars behind, hoping to document the next stop.
Not to say the installer wouldn't have anyway, but it's not inherently unreasonable to call 911 when someone is obviously following you.
8 hours ago
> call 911
It is unreasonable, because 911 is for emergencies where life or property is imminently threatened.
If you believe someone is watching and following you, then you can call the non-emergency number. Or your mom.
5 hours ago
So you have to look up the non-emergency number while someone may or may not be getting in position to do you physical harm. Even if we hate Flock as a company, that individual very much knows we hate Flock, and has reason to fear for his safety.
Edit: and then the cops just talked to the guy doing the following and didn't arrest him or anything. The 911 call is almost a non-story. It's not even a microcosm of the actual problem with Flock and, let's not forget, its copycats.
8 hours ago
> If you believe someone is watching and following you, then you can call the non-emergency number.
They can also drive to a police/fire station
7 hours ago
This is actually something I've wondered about. What is the non-emergency number?
6 hours ago
It’s just a regular phone number, so it depends what department you are trying to call. Google or a phone book is what you need.
3 hours ago
It's usually on the web page of the local police or sheriff department.
5 hours ago
In the USA its 311
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/nationally-assigned-3-d...
5 hours ago
311 does not reach law enforcement. 311 is the number to complain about code violations or request routine maintenance from the municipal government. The types of requests that go through City Hall during office hours.
5 hours ago
They can give the location of the nearest police or fire station, for some non-emergancy law enforcement issues they will put you through to the county sheriff. Had a friend call over a property dispute with their roommate and they got and sent a sheriff over (within a city that had its own municipal police force)
7 hours ago
You might have to google it because it's not standardized across the country
https://www.google.com/search?q=police+non+emergency+number+...
5 hours ago
The one thing you can do is call 911 and when they respond, just say "I need the non-emergency line" and they'll usually transfer you immediately or just check quickly with you. Just don't waffle on.
5 hours ago
I was a paramedic/firefighter for 14 years. I think while there's merit in calling out people jumping at shadows, I do get how this situation, stupidly, escalated.
And there's a bit more to EMS than "imminent life threats only".
3 hours ago
Property damage is often explicitly listed by municipalities as a reason to call 911. They might not care in New York or San Francisco, but in most small towns they usually try to catch vandals in the act.