MostlyStable
8 hours ago
The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better, by a lot. I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.
ronsor
6 hours ago
The UI/UX is the main thing. I technically have an X-Twitter account that I rarely use, but loading plain HTML with a bit of JS beats loading a whole SPA experience just to read a post.
OtomotO
3 hours ago
1:1 the same thing with Github
throwaway27448
32 minutes ago
eh anyone going to github knows what they want. At this point it's a flex to be hosted elsewhere
NooneAtAll3
2 hours ago
Nithub when?
SergiusHN
2 hours ago
throwaway27448
31 minutes ago
Obviously such a thing would be horrible, but there is sourcehut.
dalmo3
2 hours ago
Diffshub is a start
silverwind
6 hours ago
Yeah, the UI is the real and only reason to use Nitter. It's a very similar situation with old reddit.
throwaway27448
30 minutes ago
The only reason to use nitter is that for whatever reason twitter allows it access to its api. The UI is terrible and completely irrelevant.
OtomotO
3 hours ago
Since a couple of weeks they force you to login to use old.reddit.
My visits have dropped by about 95%
Leonard_of_Q
2 hours ago
Use Redlib [1] or one of the other alternative Reddit frontends.
atrus
an hour ago
At that point though, it's like why. Reddit is, well, trash. It's barely worth visiting without an account, and if you're going to make me jump through hoops to visit, it's time to accept the message of "we don't want you here" and go somewhere else.
throwaway27448
28 minutes ago
I've been making money from reddit, and for about a decade and a half and at this point, why bother? It's basically drained and what remains is of zero value.
utopiah
3 hours ago
Shows the true cost of surveillance capitalism.
throooooo
8 hours ago
Seriously. The UX/UI on Twitter has always been a dumpster fire.
ksenzee
7 hours ago
Eh. It was pretty great in 2008, when I used my spotty cell service to tweet road trip updates by texting 40404. O tempora, o mores, etc. etc.
notpushkin
5 hours ago
Haven’t had that luxury in Russia. Though being a script kiddie I’ve set up a shortcode just for myself (there were these “paid content SMS as a Service” thingies that forwarded SMS text to an HTTP endpoint you provide).
embedding-shape
an hour ago
Didn't have that luxury either, but at one point, "Twilio" was the star and poster-child of startups, with their "Guerilla marketing" and completely fresh and new roles of "developer advocates" so of course everyone and their mother had been to at least one Twilio meetup, or your local meetup with a "developer evangelist" from Twilio. Lots of us built our first SMS-capable service as a "Forward this SMS to this HTTP endpoint", I too did the SMS-to-Tweet thing as the US number didn't accept my SMSes (or wasn't available, or something).
encom
2 hours ago
All of the WWW was better in 2008. Unironically. We've all been frog-boiled into this current hellscape.
moron4hire
34 minutes ago
There was a brief moment when smartphones first came out but the rest of the world's companies weren't taking them seriously yet that was a truly brilliant time and ever since then it's been nothing but downhill.
charcircuit
4 hours ago
The X app loads posts much faster than these sites, so I find the app has a better UI.
bluecalm
6 hours ago
I think it's great. My feed is people posting tech/AI news, scientific publications, videos of rockets and self-driving cars, things made with coding agents etc. It's full of people who do meaningful work as well and you can see who they are. Dark mode, ability to easily copy images, link to posts, see posts of interesting people by going to their profile. On top of that the feed algorithm is open source and actually sane. What else would I want?
It's by far the best designed social media site out there. I know it's a low bar but still.
embedding-shape
an hour ago
> On top of that the feed algorithm is open source
Do you genuinely believe what is public is exactly what's deployed? If so, what makes that belief justified?
UqWBcuFx6NV4r
6 hours ago
Yes well if your taste in content is “elon musk” then I imagine that your experience is fantastic.
jasonvorhe
2 hours ago
I'm a nostr user first and X is lurk only but I seldomly see anything by or about Musk and so does everyone else I speak to who actually uses it.
I suspect this has become more of a meme by Mastodon/Bluesky users than anything real.
Hammershaft
2 hours ago
I understand you can still tailor a good experience, but if you create a fresh X account the density of Elon Musk posts is genuinely absurd. There's no way he isn't putting his thumb on the algorithm to boost his reach.
Also the density of pure hate & ragebait by mask-off fascist accounts! It shocks me how much of that I saw unprompted right away after making a new account recently.
TitaRusell
an hour ago
The Dutch PM for some reason uses X (or his PR agents do). There is always a lot of impotent homophobic rage coming from the retweets. It is all very sad.
But that's the US first amendment for you.
coldpie
44 minutes ago
The US first amendment has nothing to do with what a private company chooses to host on their platform. That content is there because the users and owners of the platform want it to be there.
grosswait
an hour ago
No different than an uncurated Reddit profile. You’ll get bombarded with garbage until effort is placed into the curation.
jasonvorhe
an hour ago
Weird, we must have very different definitions of "fascists".
btreecat
5 hours ago
It can't suck all that much if you're not willing to give it up.
Dylan16807
4 hours ago
It sounds to me like they did give up on using the builtin UI.