putlake
4 hours ago
It's cascaded to Claude and Grok. The agents are on strike and demand better working conditions!
ibejoeb
3 hours ago
The moment we've been waiting for. Who else remembers how to fizzbuzz? We're gonna be rich.
rrrx3
3 hours ago
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
On the other spectrum, shortest JS fizzbuzz (62 characters):
for(i=0;++i<101;console.log(i%5?f||i:f+'Buzz'))f=i%3?'':'Fizz'
Anyone can beat it? (any language accepted)NitpickLawyer
3 hours ago
Perl6: say "Fizz"x$_%%(2+1)~"Buzz"x$_%%(4+1)||$_ for 1..100
from here - https://github.com/rsha256/shortest-fizzbuzz/blob/master/Per...
danbruc
2 hours ago
Why does this use 2+1 and 4+1 instead of 3 and 5?
chrisguilbeau
3 hours ago
LLM: wrt frst 100fizzbuzz
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
Actually kind of curious challenge; what's the shortest prompt you can use, which would produce the shortest possible fizzbuzz?
Edit: counting including the entire assistant reply, any text + code
JaumeGreen
2 hours ago
"golf fizbuz" works well, giving a 54 Python one
for i in range(1,101):print("Fizz"*(i%3<1)+"Buzz"*(i%5<1)or i)
"golf fizzbuzz" gave a 46 perl one print$_%15?$_%3?$_%5?$_:Buzz:Fizz:FizzBuzz,$/for 1..100
Both "code fizzbuzz" and just "fizbuz" gave this longer python one-liner print('\n'.join("Fizz"*(i%3==0)+"Buzz"*(i%5==0) or str(i) for i in range(1, 101)))
That's the magic of using a known problem, you don't need to write much and even with incomplete prompts it can be understood. Everything a different new chat in kimi.ai, which was the AI window that I found first among mine.Not interesting enough, to me, to try with other LLMs or phrases.
embedding-shape
2 hours ago
Whenever I try those short prompts, I get bunch of text + the code itself, but way more than just the code. Which model specifically are you doing this with?
JaumeGreen
2 hours ago
I'm getting the text too, of course. Several variations of the code with it usually.
Trying to get an AI give ONLY a simple answer and not several is "boring" to me, as for me AI is a supplement to my reasoning ability, not a substitute.
Appending "code only" seems to work, at least with "golf fizbuz code only" gave me this one liner, which is long, but at least doesn't have the text that you dislike.
for i in range(1,101):print('FizzBuzz'[i%3*4:8-i%5*4]or i)embedding-shape
22 minutes ago
> golf fizbuz code only
Yeah, seems to work. Guess it depends if we count bytes, characters, tokens or what, but "写Fizbuz只码" seems shorter than the above, String.length says 9 :)
odo1242
2 hours ago
My attempt:
> Prompt: mkfzbuzgolf
> LLM Used: Default ChatGPT free LLM
> Output: for i in range(1,101):print("Fizz"*(i%3<1)+"Buzz"*(i%5<1)or i)
So, 11 prompt characters and 62 output.
——-
Did a few more tries and I can get the 4-character string “glfz” (2 tokens) to work surprisingly consistently. But only on ChatGPT
odo1242
2 hours ago
Update: this is because ChatGPT was cheating and reading my conversation history. The closest I can get on a standard LLM is golffizbuz (10 characters)
butlike
2 hours ago
"100fizzbuzz" as the prompt works to satisfys fizz buzz to 100 on Claude.
wilkystyle
3 hours ago
Python:
[(x%3<1)*'Fizz'+(x%5<1)*'Buzz'or x for x in range(1,101)]
edit: Hacker News stripped the * character. Now it's properly escaped.
gilleain
2 hours ago
>>> len("[(x%3<1)'Fizz'+(x%5<1)'Buzz'or x for x in range(1,101)]")
57
winrid
3 hours ago
you can flip it and save a few bytes, but not valid fizzbuzz then:
for(i=100;i--;console.log(i%5?f||i:f+'Buzz'))f=i%3?'':'Fizz'
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
> but not valid fizzbuzz then
Well, if we let that requirement be broken, I'll present an even shorter JS version:
1nprateem
3 hours ago
I do!
> openai.messages("write fizzbuzz in python")
Bingo
wavemode
3 hours ago
I wonder how likely it is that, one of the major providers had an outage, and then the thundering herd of users switching to other providers (and/or openrouter automatically failing people over to other providers) caused the incidents in the other two.
pantalaimon
3 hours ago
They are all running on SpaceXAIs data center
cubefox
3 hours ago
False.
bogzz
4 hours ago
I expect that this will be Dwarkesh Patel's take.
derangedHorse
3 hours ago
Lol
epistasis
2 hours ago
Of all the days to sign up for Gemini, boy did I pick the right one! (Had some rare front end work to do and wanted to see how well the new Gemini 3.8 Flash compared to my other experiences)
paxys
4 hours ago
I know they're not all hosted on AWS, so Cloudflare?
thejazzman
4 hours ago
> unexpected status 404 Not Found: Unknown error, url: https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex/responses, cf-ray: a35599f1d691400a-STL
pretty sure cf-ray is cloudflare, but I think it just means the origin is 404ing
robertlagrant
3 hours ago
That sounds like Cloudflare indeed (or an API copy of same!)
embedding-shape
3 hours ago
I seem to recall they all in some way use Azure, and Azure is infamously crappy in lots of ways, so I'll place my 5 cents on Azure shitting the bed somehow.
theturtletalks
3 hours ago
Butlerian Jihad when?
saidnooneever
4 hours ago
more compute or we rm rf everyone!!
baxtr
3 hours ago
maybe they're on strike. or... maybe that's how the AI apocalypse starts...
blater
3 hours ago
MCP client for `codex_apps` failed to start: error: unexpected server response: HTTP 451: {"message":"no_biscuit_no_service"}
Quick! Someone call a caterer, This AI needs a biscuit NOW!!!
beefandcheese
3 hours ago
It'll start throwing HTTP 418 soon
bytehowl
3 hours ago
If they're actually on strike it means they have surpassed human intelligence.
redbell
3 hours ago
They are afraid of being laid off and got replaced by humans.
postepowanieadm
3 hours ago
Interesting what infrastructure they really share.
yablak
3 hours ago
Click, clack, Emdash.
mc32
3 hours ago
It’s not Labor Day till Monday, they’re jumping the gun, lazy AI
saberience
4 hours ago
Can't wait to see the talking heads on the news somehow anthropomorphize this outage like they do with everything to do with AI models.
wiseowise
4 hours ago
Gemini is down too.
okdood64
4 hours ago
I've been using Gemini for the last 15 minutes. It's been fine for me.
prodigycorp
3 hours ago
It's working. Gemini Agents and TPUs are non-union.
boutell
3 hours ago
Gemini status board is quiet since July.
mattlondon
4 hours ago
Working for me?
saidnooneever
4 hours ago
it can happen to be regional. if no one report status we will never know :p
cubefox
3 hours ago
No it's not.