Uber is laying off 10% of staff

54 pointsposted 4 hours ago
by DeepLogin

16 Comments

garbawarb

4 hours ago

> We are also asking the vast majority of remote employees to move to an office, and going forward, only ~1% of employees will be remote.

If you believe in return-to-office as a soft layoff, even more than 10% will be leaving.

RestlessMind

26 minutes ago

“ The benefits of sitting together, collaborating in person, and solving problems as a team are clearer than ever in our post-Covid world.”

100%. Speaking only for myself, I was fully remote for a few years and that was a miserable experience. Now everyone is mandated to be in office 3 days a week and that works better for me. Uber is going one step further and structuring teams to be colocated with their manager. That solves the problem of team members distributed across multiple offices, which is still a real pain point in the hybrid model.

I know some people who strictly prefer fully remote setup. Over time, I think companies and employees will self sort themselves into those who prefer office vs those who prefer remote. That should work out for most of us.

Artgor

4 hours ago

"In Pulse surveys and conversations with many of you, we’ve heard that too much work requires coordination across teams, debates take too long, and decision-making rights are unclear. I’m sure many of you have felt that you spend too much time “aligning” rather than building, shipping, or serving customers. To improve this, we have reduced roles primarily focused on coordination, and have clarified the remit of the coordination roles that remain. "

Well, in theory this sounds reasonable. But who knows what will be the real consequences.

threetonesun

13 minutes ago

I've heard this at other companies and it's almost always an issue of upper management holding too much control over decision making, or poorly communicating actual business objects, but it's project managers and middle management that will bear the brunt of the layoffs.

sznio

2 hours ago

I don't get it. Too much time is spent coordinating, so fire those who are responsible for coordination? Am I reading this wrong?

jerjerjer

2 hours ago

People whose primary job is to "coordinate" often, either in a well-meaning attempt to be thorough or just to be relevant, try to pull as many different people into any decision-making as possible.

So instead of me just getting approval from my manager, I need to get approval/buy-in from departments A, B, and C.

In that case, firing the "coordinator" person increases velocity because parts of the business processes they prop disappear.

etse

an hour ago

That's how I read it, too.

They pinpointed the problem of over-coordination to the messenger (coordinator) instead of the teams demanding final approval over launches (coordination).

Won't merging different teams under a single owner only push the problem further down the org chart?

csande17

2 hours ago

There were too many meetings, so they got rid of the people whose jobs were to create lots of meetings.

MattGaiser

36 minutes ago

The coordinators enable extra coordination that is not worth doing. The coordination itself is the problem.

jms703

an hour ago

So TPMs are getting the axe? Product managers too?

slantedview

an hour ago

Revenue is up massively, so we'll be getting rid of the people that helped that happen. Genius move.

sidcool

10 minutes ago

This is a common strategy nowadays. Not sure of the rationale

1attice

2 hours ago

Interesting -- it doesn't cite AI (smart comms move, and a change from recent practice) but the buried lede is that this frees up resources etc etc.

I think we might be in a new phase: AI layoffs are now being disguised as regular layoffs (rather than the other way around) because of the backlash.

jaykru

2 hours ago

Layoff note mentions AI => it's not AI

Layoff note omits AI => it's AI

I am onboard with the idea that corporate messaging is typically anything but forthright but I don't see the logic here.

1attice

2 hours ago

Because AI is now a monstrous political issue, and the valence has flipped -- literally the irony I was pointing to :)

Whoosh

zamalek

an hour ago

Uber was one of the first to admit that AI isn't all it's hyped up to be.