AntonyGarand
5 hours ago
Nice to see the capabilities of the model but the article has heavy AI tones, making it boring to read.
an AI:DR; is enough: the models found unpatched vulnerabilities and managed to create an exploit to root the tablet, chinese models did it while American ones fell back to their safeguards.
Grombobulous
2 hours ago
At this point it’s more exhausting to discuss whether an article was written using AI than it is to accidentally read an article written by AI.
The article was fine. And I totally expect the kind of person spending $200 to viberoot a tablet to write their article using AI. It is what it is.
bonoboTP
3 hours ago
Definitely AI written, and it has an annoying bubbly vibe, but the content was interesting nevertheless.
I think those who don't see it as AI just don't read AI text several hours per day, like some of us.
comprev
2 hours ago
> Claude Code and I spent months on the cat-and-mouse.
To me this a tell of AI - it should read "cat-and-mouse game."
I think AI sees the cat and mouse as individual objects joined together with a hyphen rather than knowing it's a type of game.
Freedom2
2 hours ago
It's also the wrong idiom. A cat and mouse game generally implies that the mouse spends time running away and actively evading the mouse. Owning a tablet that isn't receiving updates to a avoid the "cat" isn't that.
yndoendo
an hour ago
^Claude Code and I spent ...
Is anthropomorphizing the tool.
Screwdriver and I spent ...
polotics
2 hours ago
can you point us towards the specific tells you're seeing in the article. I find the writing maybe LLM-cheerfull yes, but don't see classic phrase patterns.
boldlybold
an hour ago
I have seen phrases with "earns its keep" a lot when comparing different algorithms and tradeoffs. "GLM-5.2 cost $21.90, worked overnight as instructed, and earned its keep twice."
BoredomIsFun
2 hours ago
I would not call it bubbly; more like 1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective style. Anyway, could be fixed, to some extent with proper prompting.
nateb2022
2 hours ago
> 1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective style
Straight out of another LLM. Please name some books in this style, since it seems to be on the tip of your tongue.
BoredomIsFun
2 hours ago
> Straight out of another LLM
??? Not a native speaker, turns out short word is hardboiled.
> Please name some books in this style, since it seems to be on the tip of your tongue.
Googled for you: https://www.google.com/search?q=hardboiled+detective+book
nateb2022
2 hours ago
Could you expand on how it's pulp-fictitious? Or noir? Or "rugged" detective? Why the "rugged"? I've never heard of the word "hardboiled" referring to anything but eggs.
BoredomIsFun
2 hours ago
> I've never heard of the word "hardboiled" referring to anything but eggs.
I am glad you've lerned something new.
nateb2022
an hour ago
A human would not have applied any of these terms to the submission, let alone their amalgamation.
all2
2 hours ago
"Hardboiled" is a common term used for a certain genre of detective novel.
I don't know of any novels, but I do know that Calvin and Hobbes poked fun at this genre in some of the strips.
I suppose the comic books for Watchmen could fall into this same genre somewhat.
nateb2022
2 hours ago
This is tangential to the commenter's inability to explain their choice of words which is atypical of a human who would have went with "dense", and suggests a 3T parameter model reaching for "1960s-noir-pulp-fiction-rugged-detective".
AI comments are against the rules and I think the commenter's lack of an explanation for their choice of words sufficiently establishes it wasn't their words to begin with.
segmondy
3 hours ago
I read the entire article, I love it. Nothing boring about it.
saaaaaam
2 hours ago
I read the first few paragraphs and the stench of AI made me stop. Each to his or her own.
dolebirchwood
an hour ago
There were still meaningful lessons to take away. Your loss.
Maybe feed the article to another AI to summarize so you'll feel less hoodwinked about someone passing off AI writing as their own?
saaaaaam
an hour ago
I don’t feel hoodwinked. There’s just zero point in letting AI write stuff like this because it’s such egregious bullshit. If you want to write something, write it. If you want AI to parade something for you, what are you actually looking for? A pat on the back and a round of applause?
yipinwong
3 hours ago
Boring is subjective. I like the article but was boring AF.
redbell
30 minutes ago
> AI:DR
For those who missed it from a week ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49336573
AppleBananaPie
3 hours ago
I agree. Imo the red flags start when glancing at the section headings (before I started to read the content)
gblargg
2 hours ago
The tell.
joaomoreno
3 hours ago
I disagree. It was a good read.
rdiddly
4 hours ago
I'm not getting that from it. Although I bet I would, if I started out presuming it's AI and let confirmation bias do the rest.
f311a
3 hours ago
Prior to LLMs, I've rarely seen such headings when reading blogs, but now they are everywhere.
From the article:
> A kiosk that kept dying
> “It’s my device”
> Reality television
> The grind
> The relief pitcher
This is one of the giveaways for me.
TheRealPomax
3 hours ago
1. I've said this in real life
2. I've said this multiple times in real life because fuck FAANG
3. that's a new one for me
4. Every colleague I've worked with has used this in real life, for decades
5. Also a new one
So... sorry what were we talking about?
debugnik
3 hours ago
That barely anyone with an organic brain would use any those phrases as a heading, much less all of them.
This article isn't particularly egregious but AI does come up with really cringy headings. Most often "the <irrelevant noun>" over and over.
fc417fc802
2 hours ago
The current frontier models also have a bizarre tendency to prepend said headings with weirdly irrelevant emoji. I really wonder where they picked that up.
akie
an hour ago
It was a very prominent trend in frontend and hip JavaScript repositories on GitHub before AI
f311a
3 hours ago
Do no try to look at the individual examples, look at the overall style of headings. It's about style, people say such things, they are not unique.
mock-possum
3 hours ago
The point is not that no one says these IRL, the point is that LLMs always tend to fall back on this kind of verbiage - they got it from us, they aren’t doing anything new or special, they’re just predisposed towards a very particular kind of voice / word choice in prose.
phatskat
3 hours ago
I will echo the flagged comment in spirit:
Those are wild headings that read like an op-ed on a site covered in ads. I've said some of those things irl, and "relief pitcher" is a thing, and in solution those phrases are fine. As section headings it's wild imo
rogerrogerr
3 hours ago
I think we’re talking about the obvious AI tells that apparently only some of us can see.
Versus some of us look at five tells and say “nah, this is fine in isolation” over and over.
malshe
4 hours ago
I also had the feeling that it's AI written but not everything appeared that way. I checked it with Pangram and GPTZero and both returned with a verdict of a mix of AI and human writing. Pangram thinks it is about 50-50.
rogerrogerr
3 hours ago
I’m pretty confident it’s AI that has been told to model a writing style.
saaaaaam
2 hours ago
Only if that writing style is “incoherent bullshit”.
From the article: “It talked itself into helping me by checking whether it should. So it does have some sort of soul. I said that out loud, to an empty room.”
What?!
drakenot
4 hours ago
No, the writing style is clearly AI.
I enjoyed the content nonetheless.
jvwww
3 hours ago
It's heavily written with AI. Very painful to read.
stavros
4 hours ago
> One breath: the use-after-free let us free memory the kernel still used. Winning a race let us reclaim it with controlled data.
rpdillon
2 hours ago
Yeah, this section stood out the most to me, but I feel it was a decent summary nevertheless.
stavros
2 hours ago
I agree, I more-or-less enjoyed the post. I just can't read LLM-written posts easily these days, not out of some moral objection, it just gets really boring reading articles from the same author all day, every day.
unixhero
3 hours ago
"Managed to root" the tablet is enough
soulofmischief
2 hours ago
The numerical fixation right in the title was a dead giveaway.
rpdillon
2 hours ago
Picked up the AI vibes as well. Don't mind. Content was there.
culanuchachamim
3 hours ago
Yep, heavy AI tone. For me was very interesting and not boring. I'm really hate reading AI when no real information is added, but when it takes you step by step to understand, it's my best tool so far to really understand things.
mac-attack
4 hours ago
Ignore the message because you don't like the _perceived_ messenger.
wafflemaker
4 hours ago
It's more like, don't eat ice cream cos they taste stale or wrong. You are not forced to eat or read things you don't like/enjoy. And that's why most of us reads the articles or eat ice cream.
Especially when you can have someone (AI) summarize it.
Almondsetat
3 hours ago
This is an informative article, not a novel
fc417fc802
2 hours ago
HN is an ice cream dispenser for nerds so when people start putting gross flavors in you should expect vocal complaints.
sandeepkd
4 hours ago
Part of it is bit natural too, a human authored content has its own asymmetries to keep it interesting. LLM generated content is way too verbose and kind of lacks that factor.
Nevertheless, it was interesting experiment, also a bit dangerous reality how people are using LLMs. Just flip the context from user trying to root their own device to some one else's device.
mac-attack
3 hours ago
You are conflating human-ness with good writing skills.
georgemcbay
4 hours ago
Blogs like the one that is linked are almost entirely an entertainment medium disguised as an informational learning lesson. We already know LLMs are pretty good at security exploits, just like we already know they are pretty good at writing typical code.
Because it is an entertainment medium, the voice of the messenger is the only thing that matters and every current LLM has a boring, annoying voice. If you aren't telling us something new you better be telling us something in an entertaining fashion.
exe34
4 hours ago
You can just run it through another slopatron to reduce it to the key points.
ghomst
3 hours ago
Don't know what you're talking about, the article is good. Yes, they used ai, but this is what ai SHOULD be used for. AI should be used for either very small projects that nobody wants to do or very extreme missions that could take months.
anonuser123
2 hours ago
It's the writing style of AI. It's quite problematic for a lot of people.
I often really want to read articles, but the minute is encounter claude-speak, I (a) either leave (90%+ of the time) or (b) ask another AI to rewrite it using simple english or in a style of another writer in that space (yes, I know, it's ironical).
Just hard to read AI-ism.
The load bearing fact is it's not the content, or the originality, or the perceived lack of effort, it's reading the same trope for the 10000th time, and experiencing something akin to ad-blindness.
feralsandwich
2 hours ago
The issue isn't with using AI for finding an exploit, it's with using an AI to write up the article for human consumption about it.
BoredomIsFun
2 hours ago
> it's with using an AI to write up the article for human consumption about it.
Nothing wrong with it, as soon as it is not obviously AI-generated looking and has good, high quality content.
k_roy
2 hours ago
Seems kind of subjective innit?
fc417fc802
2 hours ago
Taste is subjective of course, but when 80% (or whatever) of your potential audience dislikes something perhaps you should just accept that it's a bad idea.
pbhjpbhj
2 hours ago
Thing is, using ML they can make more than 5 times as many articles. And I suspect those who don't object to wasting more time on an article because it was produced in a protracted way probably clock through on ads more. So annoying 80% of people might still get them more revenue in the end.
fc417fc802
2 hours ago
That is a fair point - hopefully there won't be any hard feelings when the 80% attempt to censor such slop from their platforms of choice. Taste is subjective and I come to HN for things that taste good. (Notably this leaves the door wide open for AI authored content with a decent tone.)
aprilthird2021
2 hours ago
The writing style was boring I also stopped reading halfway through esp after I read that a similar tablet had already been rooted in the past and documented online using the same exploit the AI successfully used