The Cipher Behind QSYRUPWD: Reconstructing IBM i Password Hashes

16 pointsposted 6 days ago
by kencausey

9 Comments

kencausey

6 days ago

VorpalWay

2 days ago

That seems a bit harsh, we dont know if both posters discovered this article independently.

defrost

2 days ago

I think we can assume the HN poster is well aware of where they first saw this submission link.

VorpalWay

2 days ago

Even if they did (and I dont see any evidence either way), lobsters is an entirely different site (that also requires invites, excluding the majority of users from commenting).

Since the other person decided to not post it on HN I dont see the harm in someone else reposting it here. Likewise if someone discovers something neat via HN they might repost it on, say, reddit (or vice versa).

defrost

2 days ago

Uhhh, by any chance have you looked at the user name that submitted this and the user name that made the comment you replied to?

firefax

2 days ago

Did I wander into Reddit for a moment?

We can do Reddit on HN if we want -- hell I'm jonesing for it, I bristle at restrictions on my literary tone... but obsessing over who "stole" a link seems juvenile.

Links were made to be shared :-)

VorpalWay

2 days ago

Oops I missed that indeed. Too early in the morning, my bad.