Zsfe510asG
3 days ago
There is no evidence that $500k has been paid or would be paid for an exploit like this one.
Given that the article says that prompts are modified like they are holy scripture, perhaps sell the prompt for $500k.
The author works for https://www.assetnote.io/ , which has AI products for automated scanning.
kuroguro
2 days ago
Likely referencing https://www.crowdfense.com/exploit-acquisition-program/
Zerodium used to offer up to 300k in 2021 https://www.securityweek.com/sites/default/files/images/Zero...
These brokers usually don't pay the bulk sum - they sell access to nation actors and you get payed out over time as long as the bug is not patched to discourage reselling and burning it. I doubt anyone would confirm if they got the full payment or not for something similar.
bink
2 days ago
I work in the field and I just cannot believe anyone would pay that much for a Word Press exploit. People pay money for iOS or Android because there is valuable information stored on devices running those operating systems. There's absolutely nothing of value on any Word Press site. The only possible reason I can think of is for a watering hole attack, but that would require a second exploit that would be worth far more (and they aren't).
tedggh
2 days ago
I currently work for a federal contractor including the DoD as their customer, using Wordpress as their main website. You would think there’s no sensitive information there, but some times all it takes is enough information about someone and their team to impersonate that person and gain access to an email thread, file sharing system or even an access card to a building. Never underestimate incompetence.
soulofmischief
2 days ago
And never underestimate the competence of others.
kulahan
2 days ago
lol, a big part of security is being smart enough to never challenge the bored…
grugq
2 days ago
Bulk reply to all the people replying.
bink is correct. The people who buy exploits are governments. There is very little interest in Wordpress or indeed any target that isn't a browser or a mobile. Browsers and mobiles are the only things that are perennially useful to an intelligence agency. Those two are reliable access vectors for the vast majority of things that interest government organisations.
mschuster91
2 days ago
> There is very little interest in Wordpress
I'd disagree here. Still 41% of all sites use Wordpress [1]... and that means a lot of targets, and a lot of ways to target them. Your good ole' deface/ransomware extortion scheme, leaking data supposed to be confidential (such as account lists), trusted spreaders for exploits, or the latest hit, bets on "prediction markets" that have some Wordpress site set as oracle. People are willing to screw around with airport weather stations to manipulate bets [2], it's not that much of a stretch to assume such incentives would also apply for website hackers.
[1] https://www.wpzoom.com/blog/wordpress-statistics/
[2] https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/23/europe/france-weather-sen...
strictnein
2 days ago
Plenty of underground forums sell exploits for people to do stuff like that, but you're talking $200, not a theoretical $500k.
You also don't need an RCE for 99% of that.
tptacek
a day ago
This is an axiomatic response to an empirical argument.
strictnein
2 days ago
Are they only buying browser RCEs or are they also interested in RCEs deliverable via browser?
ex: Target hits website -> site delivers RCE for some software that is on the target's system
dcrazy
2 days ago
Aren’t WP exploits valuable for watering hole attacks?
strictnein
2 days ago
You don't need an RCE for that though. There's a lot of vulnerable plugins deployed everywhere.
dcrazy
2 days ago
Ok, but an RCE in WP Core still seems pretty dang valuable, especially if you want to hit non-commercial websites that are less likely to have as many plugins installed?
illliillll
2 days ago
You already owned the WordPress admin with your browser 0day, you don’t care if WordPress is secure or not.
JSR_FDED
2 days ago
Remember the Panama papers? That was a Wordpress hack.
technion
2 days ago
Compromising a crappy wordpress site means compromising mailbox credentials.
marysol5
2 days ago
Surprising amount of gov use WP as a CMS on their websites. So it's not that far off.
madaxe_again
2 days ago
There’s a server running behind a Wordpress site. If you have RCE, you can run whatever arbitrary code you like there - mine crypto, run a botnet, all sorts of fun and profitable stuff. Hey, you can even make the site make the site’s users your unwitting hosts, too. You don’t go hack a Wordpress site, you go grab a few hundred thousand of them and do industrial scale crimes.
apercu
2 days ago
>There's absolutely nothing of value on any Word Press site.
I would hope not, but I’d be surprised if that were true across the millions(?) of Wordpress sites?
foco_tubi
2 days ago
> There's absolutely nothing of value on any Word Press site
This is just 100% an incorrect assumption. Even just an e-commerce site running Woo has troves of potentially valuable customer data. Not to mention whatever else might be on the server, or what that server is connected to...
tptacek
2 days ago
[flagged]
intheitmines
2 days ago
Is there anywhere currently buying that you can approach without a pre-existing relationship?
StrauXX
12 hours ago
Maybe the MEA brokers still are. But don't if you live in the west.
StrauXX
2 days ago
Of course it is. It just no longer exists.
tptacek
2 days ago
Oh, you've done business with them then? Know someone who has?
cmeacham98
2 days ago
Yes actually, I know someone who did business with them many years ago (before the advent of LLMs), although for a smaller sum than the advertised top payouts (the vulnerability they had was much less important).
Why post these random unsubstantiated claims on HN?
close04
2 days ago
> Why post these random unsubstantiated claims on HN?
To show everyone the Gell-Mann amnesia effect in action.
When HN top karma poster and security professional posts something like this, doubles down, and can’t even be bothered to support it in any way (I’m open to learning and changing my opinion) it completely blurs the line going into social media influencer. Quantity over quality.
parl_match
2 days ago
Yes, I have briefly done business with them as well. We also worked with Bekrar and Vupen briefly. Albeit, it was done through a broker. The second time around, we exited negotiations.
Just because they're exclusive about their clients doesn't mean they're not real. Their impact and effectiveness is a separate topic though. I don't think they're still actively operating or taking new clients, at least.
btw: "Oh, so you've done x?" What a snarky and confrontational way to ask someone something. Especially when it's asserting a well documented company and person is "not real".
tptacek
2 days ago
[flagged]
ofjcihen
a day ago
Why are you constantly responding to people like this? What makes you think you’re above the rest of HN?
tptacek
a day ago
You apparently work in the field. Do you take these "price lists" seriously?
ofjcihen
a day ago
They can be and they can not be depending on what you’re selling.
But that’s besides the point. You straight up argued that one isn’t real in the most asinine way you could.
Even if you were right that would be ridiculous. The fact that you’re wrong and have multiple people telling you you are makes it even worse.
I’ve seen you replying in snide comments whenever someone disagrees with you before. Your status as…whatever you are doesn’t give you carte to treat randoms like they’re beneath you.
tptacek
a day ago
I'm noticing you didn't answer my question.
ofjcihen
a day ago
I did explicitly answer your question, yes.
This is how all of these sites work. You would not get 500k for every exploit obviously. You would get that (or more) for great exploits.
I’m noticing you haven’t addressed anything I mentioned at all. Is that just acceptance that it’s the truth or are you just having a bad day?
Edit: Actually, let me add that for a 0click exploit on mobile devices that leads to root level permissions you’re very likely sitting on millions of dollars.
tptacek
a day ago
This is 2 years old, but goes deep into the details of how the "0 click" market works, roughly what kind of money you'd be sitting on, and what it takes to actually get that money:
https://securitycryptographywhatever.com/2024/06/24/mdowd/
It sounds like you're telling me you believe you might get six figures for a "great" WordPress core RCE. I believe that's false, and I believe that for reasons that probably indicate our premises are much too far apart to hash this out here.
I have open contempt for online price list "brokers" like Zerodium. I do not have contempt for other commenters here. I think it's important that you understand the distinction before coming at me the way you've been in this thread. Disagreeing with me, rebutting or refuting me, sharply or ungenerously: totally fine. Your weird psychoanalysis of me: not fine.
ofjcihen
a day ago
Absolutely not.
> Did you get mid-high 5 figures for a serverside vulnerability? I hear the Russians are paying $300k for Postfix! But the UAE might pay $400k through Crowdfense. These numbers are definitely real. How could they not be? They're right there on a web page.<
> Oh, you've done business with them then? Know someone who has?<
You’re replies have been snide and rude and you trying to pivot and say “you were merely talking about the brokers” is further showing you don’t care and feel entitled to continue.
Other users are calling you out on this behavior here and on other threads as well to the point that the comment you made starting this has stayed flagged.
Deflecting from someone calling out this consistent behavior is frankly ridiculous in the face of the receipts, especially trying to villainize the people calling you out for it.
Also, not even the main point anymore, but you’ve intentionally mischaracterized every argument others have put forwards including in your most recent response. I was extremely explicit about what kind of exploit commands a high price and you’ve chosen to again twist the argument to your desired conclusion:
> It sounds like you're telling me you believe you might get six figures for a "great" WordPress core RCE<
My “psychoanalysis” was an attempt at giving you grace but you seem intent on proving that talking down to others and then trying to sidestep justified criticism are default behaviors that you’re entitled to.
StrauXX
2 days ago
I do, as a matter of fact.
monster_truck
2 days ago
My lawyer says I can't answer that
jnbcxdrun
2 days ago
[dead]
ofjcihen
2 days ago
Why would you reply with something completely unsubstantiated that anyone in security at that time worth their salt would be able to call you out on and then in subsequent comments call people liars for insisting it did, in fact, exist?
I’m just baffled.
dadrian
2 days ago
The pricelist was a marketing stunt.
Hizonner
2 days ago
Why would anybody trust criminals to pay them over time?
idiotsecant
2 days ago
Because if they don't other people will hear they don't pay and won't sell them 0days
nativeit
2 days ago
How long do you figure a criminal reputation typically needs/wants to last? I have always been skeptical of “black market credit ratings”. If you happen to build one up, it’s likely only in order to rip someone off at a higher price and cash in the value of it. It’s not like you’ll need that good rep for your retirement.
applfanboysbgon
2 days ago
ShinyHunters has been "in business" since 2019 and it is their reputation that resulted in eg. Canvas paying their ransom this year. Without that reputation, it is unlikely a large-scale ransom would have been paid, because the reputation is what gives them credibility that paying the ransom will actually result in the promise being upheld.
monster_truck
2 days ago
What do you think the venn diagram looks like for people willing and able to find things like that prior to LLMs and also sell them to a broker, and are also stupid enough to flaunt a massive flashing "arrest me!!!" sign
Closest you're going to get is something like those kids in florida who just got wrapped for putting malware into steam games and draining peoples accounts. They were going to get caught anyways but it would have taken a lot longer to build a case against them if they weren't flaunting it on socials
nickff
2 days ago
Is this comment pure speculation, or do you have knowledge (or anecdotal evidence) of a similar exploit being sold for $500k?
monster_truck
a day ago
I can't answer that, did you have something you'd like to sell?
trollbridge
2 days ago
"People paid $5,000 for a Macintosh computer when they were new. I found one at a yard sale for $25."
sgerenser
2 days ago
Pre-1990s Macs (Mac Plus, SE, etc.) in good condition are actually worth a decent amount nowadays as collectors items. Not $5000, but quite a bit more than $25.
grugq
2 days ago
this is the most accurate summary.
trollbridge
2 days ago
I actually found a 1999 iMac set out for a special rubbish pick up day. The owner of the house was there so I chatted a bit, asked her if she minded if I took it.
It had last been booted on it, complete with working hard drive an; MacOS X 10.3. So $1.299 -> $0.
SoftTalker
2 days ago
That's just typical for computer hardware though. Depreciation is 3-5 years normally, after which it's considered worthless.
user
2 days ago
dang
2 days ago
Ok, we've taken $500k out of the title above.
nativeit
2 days ago
> modified like they are holy scripture
So never modified at all, even if plainly contradictory and/or ethically and morally compromised?
stellamariesays
2 days ago
[flagged]
T3RMINATED
2 days ago
[dead]
functionmouse
3 days ago
[flagged]