What's in America's Code

4 pointsposted 5 hours ago
by noyesno

4 Comments

nylonstrung

2 hours ago

The methodology is a joke, this barely qualifies as research

noyesno

5 hours ago

TLDR;

”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.

2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”

JodieBenitez

4 hours ago

> we do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.

LCRVYSB

2 hours ago

If it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?