pluc
a minute ago
US Tech is fast becoming like Russia's and China's.
a minute ago
US Tech is fast becoming like Russia's and China's.
an hour ago
Well they can’t use that to track users of Linux.
I was a big fan of Microsoft ten to fifteen years ago. I’ve since transitioned my whole family off Microsoft products now over to Linux, Apple, and proton. Edit: and Brave.
I really thought their corporate culture would’ve changed after the late 90’s but I guess this is a good lesson for founders. The culture you build into your company will likely outlast your tenure.
37 minutes ago
Both systemd and dbus have a similar device id for Linux, which e.g. Chrome reads at startup:
https://manpages.debian.org/trixie/systemd/machine-id.5.en.h...
https://manpages.debian.org/trixie/dbus-bin/dbus-uuidgen.1.e...
28 minutes ago
I don't like the idea of a persistent id for my machine. Would there be any harm in rewriting the machine-id at every boot? Or just deleting it as part of the shutdown sequence?
24 minutes ago
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that.
I have the urge to grab a pitchfork, but I know better than to make assumptions about why that functionality was added. Time to do some homework I guess.
30 minutes ago
Is this specific to Debian?
38 minutes ago
Well Enterprises can also enroll Linux machines in intune
an hour ago
To me this indicates that Microsoft has some sort of traffic analysis performed on endpoints, then linked to GDID. I'd guess this is part of Defender's real time protection or MAPS.
Fun fact, Microsoft Defender MAPS was previously named SpyNet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Active_Protection_Se...
The GDID identifier seems software in nature though. They could be more aggressive and tie it to the baseboard's serial number the way some games do. Then the hardware is tracked throughout its entire lifecycle, not just per instance of Windows install.
24 minutes ago
Vague article. No evidence that Microsoft can see what web pages you are visiting in Chrome or Firefox (for example).
an hour ago
My surprise level is at approximately... zero. Next we will see some news, that MS was compelled to share that info with some three letters. - Oh wait, that is exactly what has already happened, according to the article.
MS is just like that person, who drives a dagger into your back.
an hour ago
Truly terrifying. But also shocking that a 'hacker' is using windows
24 minutes ago
Some hackers want to spend their time doing cool stuff rather than constantly fixing their system
an hour ago
Probably a capability demanded through a TCN or TAN as part of a mechanism like Australias Access and Assistance bill.
2 hours ago
TLDR: Microsoft can (at least) correlate your Windows installation to all website domains you visit while using Windows.
It's unclear what the mechanism is, but I'd wager their "telemetry" is constantly revealing your installation ID, your current IP, and domains that were recently resolved.
an hour ago
The article links to this page, which was shared on HN yesterday. [1]
I feel like using wireshark to look at what's being sent back and forth from Windows telemetry, when using Edge, Chrome & etc should reveal what's being sent and recieved. Using MITM SSL spoofing should be able to intercept the packets.
an hour ago
I would be shocked if Microsoft was not using their own layer of certificate-pinning to stop people from doing that, and/or using another layer of encryption separate from the networking layer.
31 minutes ago
I was under the impression Windows is unreliable for these kind of activities as they are "leakish".
I imagine it's not too difficult to narrow down the potential suspects with how much data points you'd get from ISP, Windows telemetry, and whatever.
38 minutes ago
"all" would be troubling indeed. I hope that someone can discover the mechanism, and whether it's depending on any settings like "Share browsing data with other Windows features" or any other settings.
an hour ago
Worse than just domains as TFA shows full URLs are recorded.
Reminds me of Google Safebrowsing.