Has_not_been_viewed_much

106 pointsposted 3 hours ago
by wxw

27 Comments

ggm

2 hours ago

I used to borrow the books which had "to be disposed if not lent in the next 3 months" slip in them. Never regretted reading them. The best one included a very odd short story by Flann OBrien about a carpenter who walls himself inside the oak panelling of a build he is working on, and a woman convinced Sago farming will cure Ireland's famine.

kreelman

20 minutes ago

This site is vaguely addictive in a dopamine feeding sense. What will the next image be? ...One more click won't hurt... :-)

djsavvy

9 minutes ago

This is awesome. It's interesting to me how it messes with my incentives. At first I was just pulling the lever on the slot machine, then I went back and clicked on the pieces I really liked (to mark them as "viewed" for the Art Institute and show some love), but finally realized that I was systematically working to remove my favorites from the pool of images people would see.

In the end I just clicked on the "refresh" button a few more times.

Ogre

2 hours ago

There used to be a site called Forgotify that would only play songs from Spotify that had zero listens. So each song played, of course, removed that song from the set that could ever be played by Forgotify. Doesn't look like it's around any more, sadly.

dofm

an hour ago

Seems likely that Spotify is stuffed full of "songs" with zero listens now.

Klathmon

3 hours ago

How many of these images are there? I cycled through a few and ended up hitting at least one duplicate [1] that I do actually enjoy (but I can't find the name of it now that I refreshed the page, I know it had the verrazzano narrows bridge in the title)

Is there a chance a site like this could ruin their metric by inflating all the views for these lowest viewed items? Or do these not count?

[1] https://www.artic.edu/iiif/2/67395c18-c83c-865f-b0db-4736574...

netsharc

3 hours ago

The site calls the API directly (www.artic.edu), so yeah, probably it will ruin^W change the metric. It's probably the creator's idea?

Some, ahem, video sites, have "Popular videos". Of course the videos that end up there get more views and get even more popular...

dylan604

an hour ago

There's no real way to know that they really are that popular or just what the streamer wants viewers to think they are

Retr0id

2 hours ago

If the views are all real views it's hardly "inflating" anything.

Klathmon

2 hours ago

If they're using a static threshold of 200 views and there aren't many of these left it could pull them all out of that category.

It could obviously be fixed but I was more curious than anything

c-hendricks

2 hours ago

Kudos to whoever put this in the response, honestly what a fun idea.

hahahaa

2 hours ago

Opposite of a 429 right!

peesem

2 hours ago

it keeps saying "failed to load" for me. through the magic of the developer console, i can see that the api calls are working but the actual image requests are not. it seems that this is a case of an overzealous cloudflare turnstile setup since if i open the image links in a new tab and pass a challenge i can view them.

peesem

2 hours ago

if i turn off my vpn, it works, but the vpn is cloudflare's own WARP. strange

jofzar

2 hours ago

Cool project, it's actually a shame if it gets popular enough then it won't return anything

xmcp123

2 hours ago

A shame but maybe also the point? If the under appreciated art is being viewed, that sounds great.

jofzar

an hour ago

It's more that they then go to the "low view" threshold then are no longer viewed and because the date is hard coded then it will never show any more.

I agree it's the point of the project but it's a bit of a shame someone could go to the site and see no art.

functionmouse

2 hours ago

I wish I could click the picture to pop out scale to full 1x

thakoppno

2 hours ago

there’s probably some decent arguments on how to implement this.

Boss0565

3 hours ago

Wow, some of these are super cool

dofm

an hour ago

Gauguin, Manet, Rembrandt and Whistler sketches, Weston nudes, Harry Callahan photos, amazing things indeed.

People generally seem quite uninterested in preparatory sketches/studies/maquettes by famous artists, which is absolute madness, to my mind. Unfinished and transitory work is much more interesting to me. Photographers' contact sheets especially.