john_strinlai
7 hours ago
it would be cool if it was judged by humans, blinded to whether the submissions were 0% ai, some ai, 100% ai, etc.
but it is judged by ai, which makes it much less cool in my opinion.
to demonstrate the absurdity, the second best submission right now has a note "Literally the Fable essay, but with one letter changed", ranking 10 pts higher than the Fable one.
UncleOxidant
7 hours ago
I'm trying to figure out why I should have any interest at all in participating in this? I mean, other than the $1000, but there's really no clear criteria as to what would win that $1000 since AI is judging it.
fkozlowski
7 hours ago
It is actually judged by a human at the end FYI.
"The top 5 submissions will be finalists, judged by hand."
UncleOxidant
7 hours ago
Kind of like submitting resumes these days. AI winnows them down and the remaining few get passed to humans.
sph
7 hours ago
And who knows what ‘gems’ might have been skipped by the machine.
john_strinlai
7 hours ago
it still loses its luster, for me, knowing that the top 5 are ai-selected
user
7 hours ago
383toast
6 hours ago
I mean it's obvious that note is trolling
john_strinlai
6 hours ago
unless you have seen the submission, i have no idea how you could possibly know.
so, if you don't mind, what are the 'tells'? what "obvious" things did i miss?