I think it's a horrible idea. It's also impractical.

What company is going to willingly face the inevitable wrongful death and injury lawsuits that result?

Before it is possible to have an intelligent robot, it will be possible to have an intelligent chat companion on the other side of all our screens.

I can see mandatory AI-driven all-emergencies sensors in rental accommodation, just as smoke alarms became mandatory in rental accommodation over my life. Would've saved my grandmother some embarrassment in old age when she fell and couldn't get up, had to stay on the floor until the carer arrived the following morning.

But a robot companion? That's as likely as governments tackling prostate cancer by mandating all men use prostate massage equipment.

Most countries laws about health are based on freedoms and entitlements not obligations. So most people are free to choose to do things that are bad for their health.

Who would do the requiring, how would they enforce it, and what would motivate them to bear the expense?

although the androids would learn at accelerated pace, there would be a functionally driven requirement to train androids for social conduct. They would be pervasive, but not mandatory, perhaps more immediately useful than a speaker on a shelf, or a button hanging around your neck, but marketed in a similar manner.

I think they’ll have to kill me before I kill myself if they wanted to enforce that.