I had some "reverse classroom" classes back in college, and it was the best kind of class for me. Read the papers on your own time before class, and spend class discussing and in tests.

It did, however, absolutely require everyone to prepare for every class. Some people complained a lot about this, which might be why this was not as popular as more common lectures.

I had a chat with my state legislators to streamline education; shift all public school and university funding to libraries staffed by SMEs

Mandate N hours year of and guided group work for under 18s

Mandate N hours for becoming an SME for roles that require such

Break the pipeline from the factory era of linearly pumping out kids who are just smart enough to run the machines

Paper reviews are traditionally blinded, so the reviewer doesn't know the authorship of the paper they're reading.

If a journal finds that it's getting more papers than peer reviewers are willing to go through, how does a more heavyweight, synchronous review process solve the problem? Many researchers already find peer review requests annoying, they're not going to agree to hold a bunch of video calls.

It's not the era of the superman coming. It's the era of the sewers man.

What superhuman? This system will never have a 99.99% accuracy based on its current prediction models and data input, neither is it a targeted to make us superhumans in the first place.

It still will need human supervision for corrections and if it doesn't it won't require humans to process further. Humans are not in the central picture of the future of AI.