GameBoy Workboy

143 pointsposted 6 hours ago
by tosh

44 Comments

dgellow

5 hours ago

Access seems pretty strict

——

403 Forbidden

You are unable to access this site.

Sorry, you are not allowed to access tcrf.net right now.

If you are using a VPN, try disabling it first. We block many VPNs because of abuse.

If that does not work, the block may be due to one of the following reasons:

You are connecting using a network we have blocked. Your connection is still using a VPN or proxy (incl. Apple Private Wi-Fi, CloudFlare relays, etc.) You are a badly-behaving or unwelcome bot (ChatGPT, bingbot, yandex, etc.) You are using a badly-behaving extension (eg. Imagus, etc) that is trying to load every single version of a file in the background If you were able to view pages before, and this error message has suddenly appeared in place of what you were expecting, make sure you are not running any extensions or tools that are attempting to download everything at once. It is possible you were manually blocked, and it might be removed soon. If not, well, sorry.

If this page always apppeared, there is likely not a lot you can do. If you are using a VPN, turn off your VPN and try again.

Sorry for the trouble. We have been under a long-running DDoS attack.

willXare

3 hours ago

403 Forbidden is just the modern version of blowing into the cartridge.

free_bip

5 hours ago

That's weird, I can connect just fine over mullvad.

MrDrMcCoy

5 hours ago

I'm on Mullvad and got blocked.

echelon

2 hours ago

30 out of 34 comments are about the content blocking.

Only four comments are about the content of the article, and none of them really go into depth.

This has been at the top of HN all day. If people can't see it, what gives?

Bratmon

an hour ago

People who can see the article can see that it's incredibly mid and not worth commenting on.

But for people who can't see the article, it could be anything! For all they know, they're being kept out of the greatest content of all time!

Xkeeper

an hour ago

From my logging, most people can access it just fine.

As for "what gives", I have no idea. The article itself isn't interesting and doesn't contain much of value; the "game" itself is what is interesting, but that's not what the article is there to cover.

So my guess is it's just only the people who can't see it, because for others there's not really much to discuss. I don't know why this was even posted here, to be honest.

marcosscriven

3 hours ago

Blocking Apple iCloud privacy is pretty extreme.

dmitrygr

2 hours ago

It isn’t blocked. It is on for me and the site loaded fine.

marcosscriven

2 hours ago

It was at the time. Now it’s loading fine. In the 403 screen it specifically called out iCloud privacy.

retired

2 hours ago

It’s basically “give me your IP address before you can continue so we can better data mine you”

as1mov

2 hours ago

Yeah, the community run TCRF wiki is banning VPNs just so they can mine your data along with the luxurious $400/mo they're getting from Patreon. And not because they're constantly being besieged by rampant bots that they have to resort to such drastic measures.

calmworm

44 minutes ago

Why not use a captcha or turnstile?

retired

an hour ago

I don’t know anything about TCRF or what they do as their website blocks me. I do see trackers from multiple big corporations on tcrf.net.

What bots are using Apple Private Relay?

Xkeeper

an hour ago

This is fascinating to me, because you just said you can't see it, but also that there are "trackers from multiple big corporations". Can you tell me what those are?

I ask primarily because we explicitly don't use any trackers, to a degree I actually pride myself on running a website that doesn't contact anything else: https://mini.xkeeper.net/private/C58L77azpY.png

The sole exceptions are YouTube embeds, afaik. I even switched out the MediaWiki and CC badges to be local.

Telaneo

an hour ago

uBlock Origin shows nothing out of the ordinary but Youtube, Google and Doubleclick, so Google, Google and Google, and I assume all of those are due to the embed.

Xkeeper

37 minutes ago

If you mean the block page, yes, that's just the YouTube embed. You'll see the same results on any wiki page that has a YouTube embed for the same reason; it's not tracking or anything I have control over (other than outright not having YouTube embeds). But I think if anyone has concerns over that, they're better addressed at the local-user level by disabling all unauthorized iframes.

retired

42 minutes ago

On the “ Sorry, you are not allowed to access tcrf.net right now” page I get tracked by Google, YouTube and DoubleClick according to the report by Safari.

I also have 924 kilobyte of data stored on my device after visiting tcrf.net without any consent.

willXare

3 hours ago

The original "work from anywhere" setup, as long as anywhere had two AA batteries.

retired

2 hours ago

Anywhere with enough ambient light.

calmworm

5 hours ago

Site blocks VPN users.

Xkeeper

an hour ago

Unfortunately true. I wrote about it early last year here: https://blog.xkeeper.net/uncategorized/tcrf-has-been-getting...

The story has not changed much. Every so often I will remove most of the blocks put in place, and within a few hours I'm back to having to block them. Many of the cheaper VPNs are also hosted on AWS / Google Cloud / Azure (or other cloud providers), which are also unilaterally blocked.

I would much prefer we did not have to do this, but it is what it is.

deadbabe

4 hours ago

This is why you should self host your VPN.

Retr0id

an hour ago

But where do you self-host it? Most sites that block VPNs also block VPSes

retired

4 hours ago

Does that not defeat the anonymity aspect?

DANmode

3 hours ago

You mean pseudo anonymity, from advertisers mostly?

deadbabe

4 hours ago

VPNs even from big public providers have not been a reliable way to protect anonymity for a while now. Use VPNs for cryptographic security and circumventing region control.

ErroneousBosh

3 hours ago

Many of us only like legitimate users, and therefore block VPNs.

lxgr

2 hours ago

What makes a VPN user inherently “illegitimate” in your view?

mschuster91

2 hours ago

The problem is the whack-a-mole game with hackers and script kiddies. It used to be the case that banning known colo ASNs was enough to get rid of nuisance by STROs, then there was a flood of hacked routers being used for DDoS that was really annoying to get rid of, and then came "residential IP" VPNs and commercial VPNs, both of which get routinely abused by AI scrapers and frankly, the AI scrapers are a worse enemy than the skiddies of 10 years ago. They ruin everything.

And you as a site operator can't really tell apart skiddies, griefers, AI scrapers and legitimate users apart any more.

deadbabe

2 hours ago

What are they doing exactly?

therein

an hour ago

Almost as if you shouldn't be banning users because of their IP unless that IP specifically has openly attacked you.

Or I guess you can just DENY ALL.