Claude Code and Codex are my daily drivers, and I often run them side by side on the same task to compare. For me Claude Code gets something working faster, but I burn the 5h quota on the $200 Max plan really fast. Codex I tend to trust a bit more on the careful diffs. The bigger change for me wasn't the tool though, it was writing a spec doc first (features/UX, technical, language-specific) before either agent touches code, then reviewing every diff. I still set up a lot of the harness by hand. How are people automating worktrees and parallel sessions?
Letta Code - It’s a much more coworker-like experience because it can learn, but also performs very well for coding, and the harness can be extended like pi
(disclaimer: I work on Letta Code)
Doesn't the memory in letta become very expensive considering that LLMs are stateless (the context of the memory needs to be sent).
Both CC (mostly pet projects and automation), and Cursor (mostly at work, because I still read the code, interact with python notebooks, etc.)
claude code mostly. run a clawmetry tab alongside so i can see what's actually happening across sessions, especially for longer tasks.
Used Antigravity, but now Claude Code