hamid_wakili
8 hours ago
i really would love to know where the data is coming from
cdilling-ch
7 hours ago
[dead]
bethekidyouwant
8 hours ago
From you signing up and giving them your data
Show HN: Claude Code vs. Codex Global Usage Leaderboard
11 pointsposted 9 hours ago
by optimizethis15 Comments
maxshadurskiy
8 hours ago
Good to hear. We doing something similar at https://thrumlabs.com/ but with rewards and private leaderboards
spiderfarmer
8 hours ago
Great example of how AI can make something look decent, but when you're actually trying to grasp what it tries to communicate, you can really notice the lack of a human touch.
bot403
8 hours ago
Not just a problem communicating but a lack of a problem here.
Why do I want to publish my team's ai usage with this random site? It's all risk and no upside.
Esophagus4
5 hours ago
Especially when, if you’re an org that is heavy users of AI… you could just vibe code your own leaderboard and not have to pay monthly?
Presumably you will not be using this product long term, so why bother paying for something rather than just vibing a quick telemetry script and dashboard?
codybontecou
8 hours ago
Pay to publish your team's ai usage*
cdilling-ch
7 hours ago
[flagged]
keeganpoppen
8 hours ago
the human touch from human curation of the ai output, which tends to be sorely lacking.
SlavikCA
8 hours ago
where that usage data coming from?
bethekidyouwant
8 hours ago
You sign up with them and they track your usage. Why would anyone want to do this?
It’s slop all the way down.
Esophagus4
5 hours ago
It’s not really for individuals… check the use cases tab.
It’s for enterprise to see who’s using AI and track token usage / spend.
lostmsu
6 hours ago
If their tracking tool is open, why not?
dyauspitr
8 hours ago
So it’s heavily self selecting and pointless.