A truck driver spent 20 years making a scale model of every building in NYC

364 pointsposted 2 days ago
by 1659447091

60 Comments

mistermark

26 minutes ago

What timing, just saw this over the weekend. It really is impressive that a single person could putter away at this on his own. This really brings home the scale of Brooklyn and Queens v. Manhattan. There are binoculars but they're terrible, so if you have a small set, take them.

c7b

16 hours ago

Awe-inspring. But one thing I don't get: he says he wants every building to be included, but the buildings in NYC are anything but permanent. Did he pick a particular timestamp for everything, or is it a mosaic of different epochs? Keeping the model up to date would be even more insane.

1659447091

16 hours ago

> he wants every building to be included, but the buildings in NYC are anything but permanent

I think he took creative liberties there. The Twin Towers and One World Trade Center are included; he started the project in ~2004

jeffhwang

8 hours ago

I might have to visit this exhibit next time I'm in NY. I hope their materials will answer the question of how he dealt with new construction, remodels, and demolitions over his 20 years!

keeganpoppen

16 hours ago

i absolutely love the sentiment from this closing sentence:

> “One of the reasons Joe is so insistent that every single building is here is because he would never want someone to come and see it and not be able to find where they live and see their story,” Sherman tells Artnet.

OJFord

6 hours ago

'Truck driver' here serving only to put him down, because the feat wouldn't be expected of such a person?

Seems to me like papers' infamous (at least in the UK) references to victims' or alleged perpatrators' house prices, to instruct our sympathy, when it's not otherwise at all relevant.

hdgvhicv

4 hours ago

“Normal person with normal job”

This isn’t someone working as a full time artist, this isn’t someone living off a trust fund, this isn’t someone selling their creating for millions for the money laundering. This is just a “man in his shed” with a blue collar job doing something awesome.

It says “anyone can doing something awesome”, you don’t need a fancy upbringing or million dollar backing.

nopakos

6 hours ago

Artist who spent 20 years making a scale model of every building in NYC, makes a living as a truck driver.

mikkupikku

3 hours ago

Putting him down is your judgement revealing your own biases. Personally, I saw it as a put up. He's not some privileged prick, he's a normal guy!

xyzal

4 hours ago

'Artist' would be more fitting.

gsinclair

4 hours ago

Depending, of course, on how many artworks he’s sold.

ninalanyon

2 hours ago

Artworks sold by artist is a very poor way to define who is and is not an artist. Look at Vincent van Gogh who only sold one painting.

rkuska

16 hours ago

There is a miniature of Prague from around 1830 by Antonín Langweil. He dedicated his all free time to finish it in a hope of making money for his daughters. Langweil never found a benefactor for his work and he died poor. Pretty tragic story.

https://www.muzeumprahy.cz/en/visit-langweils-model-of-pragu...

AgentMatt

15 hours ago

His last name sounds very close to the German word for boredom (Langeweile), that's kind of funny...

omnimus

16 hours ago

Unfortunately the museum itself is pretty lame. I don't recommend.

layman51

16 hours ago

This is kind of timely for me because very recently I had heard of the film "Synecdoche, New York", but in this film, the scale model is more life-size.

wincy

15 hours ago

A little off topic, but any time I see that word, it reminds me of the first time I read the word “synechdoche”, I wanted to know how to pronounce it and watched a very helpful YouTube video [0] three times before realizing someone had pulled a very funny prank from an earlier, less serious time on YouTube. I laughed and laughed.

[0] https://youtu.be/v-n1vGeVIXo

ModernMech

2 hours ago

man that's a blast from the past, can't believe that's 14 years old :\

cortesoft

12 hours ago

I was wondering if the scale model would have a smaller scale model at the location of the original model...

tejohnso

18 hours ago

Looking at the level of detail, and the thoroughness, I wouldn't have expected it to even be possible to complete it in 20 years. How much time does this guy spend driving truck? Amazing accomplishment and display of dedication and creativity.

drakythe

17 hours ago

20 * 365.25 = 7305 days. Assuming their "near a million buildings" number tracks to somewhere around 950,000, he would have had to build 130 "structures" a day on average.

This is all round and not precise numbers, considering he had to have days where he couldn't build, I'm guessing on the number of structures, and he started in 2004 (22 years ago), accuracy is not possible. But still, even if we fudged it down to 100 structures a day: This is BONKERS.

The man has a prodigious skill at building simple models and painting them. I am incredibly impressed. And I am curious if he did it all alone or if he ever had help from friends/family, even just simple cutting of the balsa wood into simple templated shapes for him to later construct. (To be clear, even if he had help it takes nothing away from how impressive this is)

noisy_boy

12 hours ago

Maybe after a few thousand buildings, he built specialized tools to quickly build the templates in bulk. Still incredible.

dyauspitr

9 hours ago

Like what though? Every building is a little different and the fastest way I can think of is laser cutting or CNC which is still pretty slow. Unless he was whole hog CNCing entire city blocks that is. Though the article mentions “balsa wood cut with an X-Acto knife”. If that part is true, this is utterly incredible and I have no idea how he pulled off more than 100 buildings a day.

matusp

8 hours ago

Looking at the pictures in the article, the level of detail is not particularly great in some parts. It seems like many building have very simple shape and color. With some modeling skill, I can imagine carving and painting 100s of these in a day. Although I can't imagine doing it for 20 years.

I would however like to know what his research was like. Was he just following Google Maps/Earth? They were released in 2005 and 2001 respectively and NY has had coverage from the get go.

prawn

14 hours ago

"A model-maker spent 20 years driving trucks!"

Carrok

17 hours ago

"We overestimate what we can achieve in a day, and underestimate what we can achieve in a year."

esafak

17 hours ago

Your sibling post estimated it pretty well :)

PhilippGille

16 hours ago

If you are interested in scale models of New York, there's a 1:1 scale model in Minecraft: https://youtu.be/ZouSJWXFBPk

fixxation92

an hour ago

Wow, that is phenomenal. I don't play Minecraft, but my kids do- so I can see them and can appreciate all the work that went into this. Fair play!

j_bum

13 hours ago

Incredible effort… thanks for sharing this!

I’d love to learn more about the technical challenges. For example, how do they handle buildings that aren’t perfectly aligned to the cardinal axes?

bigweeble

16 hours ago

Whoa. I admire the time and dedication to both models. However, I can't help but LOVE the minecraft model since it will live on. Now we just need to 3D print the minecraft model :D

kmoser

10 hours ago

Is there a way to visit this online, without having to download and install software locally?

hermitcrab

19 hours ago

Brilliant. Stay weird, humans.

mckn1ght

17 hours ago

Any way to know how many buildings were demolished and a newer one built in its place over that 20 year period? Wonder what he used for a reference. Is the model representative of a single moment in time, or is there some clock drift?

billfor

18 hours ago

drakythe

17 hours ago

1:1,200 scale vs 1:2,400 scale, or 9,335 square feet vs 1350 square feet.

Both are absolutely incredible. I find the growth in size numbers difficult to really comprehend even though the scale difference is an "easy" * 2. I wish I wasn't so so bad at visualizing things.

kylecazar

13 hours ago

Wow. Imagine how much time would be saved with the new immersive view and 3D building modeling that wasn't available when he started in 2004.

Of course, saving time was clearly not the point of the project. It's awesome.

wowczarek

12 hours ago

Synecdoche, New York. We all have our magna opera, but those types I really admire. A great form of therapy as well.

llmslave

18 hours ago

We need people like this around

Nevermark

18 hours ago

How long before we can build tiny controlled cars and little tiny "pole people" that wander around?

Micro-machines seem to be taking their time.

pack_stimulus

10 hours ago

How amazing. Would love to see that in person.

carabiner

12 hours ago

This is what humans should be doing with their lives, and not spending 8 hours/day staring at screens. I'm so serious.

throwpoaster

14 hours ago

“A sculptor drove a truck to fund his art.”

contubernio

18 hours ago

Why is it relevant what he does for a living? It's his passion and hobby that is interesting.

tiagod

2 hours ago

His job involved driving every day around the same city he was modeling.

bell-cot

18 hours ago

> Why is it relevant...

I'd say the point is "An Ordinary Guy did X". Vs. an engineering genius, or somebody with deep pockets, or a Hollywood special effects model builder, or 3D printer junkie, or whatever.

josfredo

17 hours ago

He is with certainty not ordinary, precisely because of the feat. So a “an ordinary guy did x” statement would be false.

bell-cot

16 hours ago

The point is that he came to the table with "ordinary" talents, equipment, skills, financial resources, etc.

That he had to get extremely focused on the task, and devote years to it, is pretty well spelled out in the article's title.

gremlinunderway

16 hours ago

Jesus christ this is pedantic. You do understand that not all statements can be universally distilled to true or false right? That there's nuance and opinion here right?

philipallstar

18 hours ago

> “We were all standing around squealing, ‘Look, there’s our museum!’ ‘There’s the Met; there’s the Guggenheim,’” Sherman recalls. “It’s this great act of recognition, and then it’s also witnessing [Macken’s] creativity, how he made this complex architecture out of very humble materials.”

Blue collar, dedicated, skillful effort over decades immediately co-opted by nonsense-spewer.

avidruntime

18 hours ago

co-opted? The last paragraph of the article suggests this was quite literally the artist's goal:

> “One of the reasons Joe is so insistent that every single building is here is because he would never want someone to come and see it and not be able to find where they live and see their story,” Sherman tells Artnet.

Its not like they broke into his shop and shared his model with the world before he could, it is currently an exhibition at the Museum of the City of New York.

krustyburger

17 hours ago

Nor is it nonsense to acknowledge how cool it is to recognize your own building or that he was able to accomplish the project without expensive materials. Spew is also quite the verb to use. What an all-around unpleasant comment.

philipallstar

17 hours ago

> co-opted? The last paragraph of the article suggests this was quite literally the artist's goal:

Unless the person quite literally lives in that museum, I don't think "quite literally" is in any way accurate.

> Its not like they broke into his shop and shared his model with the world before he could, it is currently an exhibition at the Museum of the City of New York.

I'm not saying they did. I'm saying what they said was a load of rubbish.

drakythe

17 hours ago

> I'm not saying they did. I'm saying what they said was a load of rubbish.

I disagree. Employees often take some form of "ownership" over their buildings, especially in long term and public education facing facilities like museums. It isn't difficult to understand why they said "there is our museum". Human language connotes ideas as often as it does specifics, and there is nothing rubbish about that.