XReplicator – eBPF-based server backups that track only changed disk sectors

3 pointsposted 8 hours ago
by iamvishnuks01

Item id: 47527328

2 Comments

drunken_soul

3 hours ago

Pretty interesting idea — few things I was curious about:

What was the benchmark actually run against? Like what kind of disk size, workload, and baseline are those numbers comparing to?

Also, how does this behave on something like a busy db server where reads/writes are constantly happening? And more generally, what kind of overhead does the agent add to the running system — both with the eBPF path and in cases where it falls back to the non-eBPF flow?