jedberg
9 hours ago
Some may want to come in here leaving snarky comments about how they shouldn't vote for an administration that doesn't believe in climate change. But I will give a concrete example:
This administration fired thousands of Forrest Service and BLM employees at the start of the administration last year. Those workers were the ones that were responsible for the maintenance of these lands and for the fire lookout programs.
Maybe they couldn't have prevented this fire, but it's pretty clear these fires are much worse today because of those firings last year.
hallway_monitor
9 hours ago
I’m not sure if these fires are correlated with the staff reductions in BLM. In the interview with a resident she doesn’t mention anything about that, just that last year was very wet which provided a lot of fuel and this hot dry spring has turned it into a tinder box.
jedberg
9 hours ago
BLM provides fire lookout services that were severely cut. They also perform prescribed burns, which they no longer have staff and budget for, which would have reduced the dry grass.
user
9 hours ago
toomuchtodo
9 hours ago
This administration also impaired FEMA’s ability to provide disaster response to those impacted by this event.
mothballed
9 hours ago
I seriously doubt ranchers were politically against OPM being used for fire prevention funding. Agriculture industry is well known to be highly socialist politically when it comes to agriculture subsidies.
jedberg
9 hours ago
Of course they weren't but look at how Nebraska voted in the last election. Other than the cities, it was mostly GOP, the party that explicitly said they would cut funding for those services if elected (it was in Project 2025).