Roger Ebert Reviews "The Shawshank Redemption" (1999)

62 pointsposted 11 hours ago
by monero-xmr

75 Comments

tkocmathla

8 hours ago

> There’s a feeling in Hollywood that audiences have short attention spans and must be assaulted with fresh novelties. I think such movies are slower to sit through than a film like “Shawshank,” which absorbs us and takes away the awareness that we are watching a film.

This resonates with me and is a really concise way to explain why, to me, a 2 to 2.5 hour long Marvel or Transformers movie feels like an eternity, while a movie like Shawshank never has me checking my watch.

jcynix

7 hours ago

Ghibli movies are a different class of movies, but the exact thing that you describe "absorbs us and takes away the awareness that we are watching a film" is what happends to me. The story is so intriguing that I even "forget" that I'm watching a painted movie.

ted_bunny

6 hours ago

Spirited Away contains an accurate review of itself in the title!

tootie

30 minutes ago

Kurosawa did this better than anyone. He could make you sit through 2.5 hours of grinding drama and make it feel like barely 5 minutes have passed. Ran (1985) was like that.

smurda

7 hours ago

This is one of my favorite movies, yet it won 0 Oscars (nominated for 7) and was a box office flop (cost $25M to make and box office proceeds were $28M). It only gained popularity after the theatres from the VHS rental market.

I firmly believe part of the initial commercial failure was because of the title. With something more descriptive like, "Escape from Shawshank" or just "Prison Break" people would have been more interested to see it.

cm2187

6 hours ago

For the academy awards, to its defense, it was competing against Pulp Fiction, Forrest Gump, Four Weddings and a Funeral, or the Madness of King George. I can barely name one good movie a year these days, and certainly none that makes it to the oscars. The contrast with the 90s is brutal.

ignoramous

6 hours ago

> can barely name one good movie a year these days

Not really.

Of the recent movies, Everything Everywhere All at Once is a storytelling masterpiece. Since you mentioned it, I personally rate it alongside Tarantino's Pulp Fiction.

delichon

an hour ago

> Everything Everywhere All at Once is a storytelling masterpiece

I thought it was so awful I gave up half way through. Maybe it gets better after that. But I agree on Pulp Fiction.

neversupervised

23 minutes ago

Agreed. Not as good a film as it was advertised to be.

ec109685

an hour ago

Me too. And love pulp fiction. Just used Mr. Wolf to reference a situation at work.

Eddy_Viscosity2

3 hours ago

This was a good movie, but what was it up against. Were there 4 or 5 other movies of comparable goodness that any of could have won the oscar? So 'can barely name one good movie' is apt here. There are some, but way fewer and farther between.

ProllyInfamous

an hour ago

Everything Everywhere... is a much better movie than the incredible Pulp Fiction. Some of the visual effects are actually psychedelic (I've "seent" them), and the storytelling is exceptional.

The scene where the antagonist is walking down a hallway while the background keeps changing — is among the best fight scenes / visuals in any film, ever.

relaxing

2 hours ago

That’s only one movie.

pavlov

7 hours ago

The Finnish importer tried this. They decided to call the movie “Rita Hayworth – avain pakoon”. It means “Key to the escape”…

These people would have presumably called Planet of the Apes “Distant future in Eastern United States”…

georgecmu

43 minutes ago

The translations of the title (Finnish, Greek, others?) referencing Rita Hayworth make more sense if you know the title of Stephen King's novella the movie was based on (Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption).

nntwozz

7 hours ago

On a tangent the movie Cold Mountain (2003) was translated to "Åter till Cold Mountain" in Swedish.

Now you may ask, where is the actual translation? They just added Swedish words to the original title (which just means back to Cold Mountain".

Who are these people and how do I apply for a job? It seems like a perfect workplace.

karim79

7 hours ago

Reminds me of the Luc Besson film "Leon", which also went by the names "The Professional" and also "Leon: The Professional". A great film but there was definitely something going on in regards to getting crowds interested purely by messing with the title of the film.

ted_bunny

6 hours ago

Confound: I think one of that film's themes made people deeply uncomfortable, and it was not hidden from the marketing as far as I know. I was a bit put off by its execution myself, even though there's really nothing untoward about it on a factual level.

relaxing

2 hours ago

You can just say it: It was weird how they made 12 year old Natalie Portman act sexy and come on to Jean Reno.

ted_bunny

an hour ago

I can, but do I need to? It's already "that movie."

riffraff

7 hours ago

the italian dubbing was named "le ali della libertà" (the wings of freedom), which is one of the rare cases where I agree with using a different name than the original, since nobody would have clue what "Shawshank" means.

kstrauser

18 minutes ago

No one in the US knows, either. It’s a fictional prison and its name means nothing except to people already familiar with the story.

nopakos

6 hours ago

In Greece it was released as "Τελευταία έξοδος: Ρίτα Χέιγουορθ" literally "Last Exit: Rita Hayworth". People were saying, jokingly, that the title was a spoiler.

HeavyStorm

7 hours ago

In Brazil it was released as A Dream of Freedom. Gotta say it took me years to learn the original title.

haunter

6 hours ago

In hungarian it's translated into "prisoners of hope" (A remény rabjai) which I think is pretty good even though I despise dubbing

6stringmerc

2 hours ago

In the US, my experience correlates with the rise of TNT and cable television - Ted Turner bought the rights to show certain films on his new cable channels and “Shawshank” got heavy rotation. It was akin to “background noise” sometimes. Others can probably recall the frequency.

Based on a Stephen King short story, I’m a fan. Never did catch “The Majestic” and no interest. Ebert was a national treasure, great share.

plasma_beam

2 hours ago

This generation will never experience the joy of flipping on network tv on a Saturday or Sunday afternoon, seeing Shawshank on, sitting down and just watching it, even though you’ve seen it countless times and it’s the tv-edited commercial filled version.

netsharc

an hour ago

I lived in Germany, and movies are dubbed there, so the TV stayed mostly off. I did turn on the TV once. There was a movie that looked half interesting, so I focused on it. The scene was two guys at the airport to pick up a girl who they had a crush on in highschool. They're waiting for her at the arrivals. "There she is!", cut to... not the girl walking in looking all glorius, but a beer ad. I turned it off and looked for the movie on Torrent.

TonyStr

8 hours ago

> [...]and the redemption, when it comes, is Red’s.

(spoilers)

It never sat right with me that Andy is shown to be innocent, and some viciously evil irrelevant character did it instead. This, I thought, takes away the whole redemption aspect of the movie, turning Andy into an innocent Mary Sue. I'd never considered that it may be more about Red's character instead. Though I didn't catch a satisfying explanation for that idea in the review, and it's been a long time since I watched the move.

I think I'll rewatch it today.

maxerickson

an hour ago

Andy has to be innocent for his escape (and bringing down of the warden) to be a redemption. It's a redemption of his life against the injustice he was subjected to, not a redemption of his soul for some evil that he committed.

If he was a double murderer, plotting to and successfully escaping isn't a redemption, it's just a murderer getting away with it.

twoodfin

24 minutes ago

Andy is by no means innocent, he’s just not guilty of any crime he should have been imprisoned in Shawshank for.

The guy who sits drunk in his car eyeing a revolver is not a Mary Sue. And his demeanor of resignation at Shawshank suggests he doesn’t consider himself just an unlucky victim of blind fate & a golf pro.

spiderfarmer

7 hours ago

It was my first movie about prison life in the US and the failures of the American justice and correctional system. I since learned it was realistic in every aspect apart from the escape, and that not much has changed since.

Everything about it is depressing and somehow it’s the best movie ever.

ted_bunny

6 hours ago

Yes, it was a bit too uncomplicated to me and smacks of "Oscar Bait."

cainxinth

an hour ago

I feel that anyone that has ever suffered an injustice (and who hasn’t at some time or another) can relate to this film. And survivors of all kinds can understand what it means to “crawl through a river of shit” to earn their reprieve.

decimalenough

8 hours ago

Quite a few classics like this and "Office Space" were box office flops that were resurrected by the magic of VHS/DVD. Yet those are gone too. Is there any room left for the "sleeper hit" in 2026?

troupo

7 hours ago

There's no space left for actual hits. Movies aren't even given proper theatrical releases. One week at the theater then straight to streaming, or even simultaneous theater and streaming releases.

forrestthewoods

7 hours ago

K-pop demon hunters.

haunter

6 hours ago

That's not a sleeper hit, it became the most watched animation ever on Netflix 1 month after the release and then the most watched film ever after 2 months.

vanviegen

2 hours ago

Yeah, but it's a good example of a modern day 'indy' cult classic. It's a regional production that happens to do really well with global viewers.

jadbox

2 hours ago

What about it

karim79

7 hours ago

"Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption" is one of my favourite Stephen King short stories (From "Different Seasons"). I actually read it after watching the film (which is just amazing) and still ended up liking the short story more than the film. I would highly recommend it to just about anyone.

lemonberry

7 hours ago

"Stand by Me" was based on "The Body" from that same book. Great collection.

riffraff

7 hours ago

"Apt Pupil" was also adapted as a movie tho not as good as the other two, imvho.

SigmundA

2 hours ago

Fun fact Apt pupil has a reference to Shawshank where the main character says he lives off stocks that a banker setup named Dufresne who went to prison for murdering his wife.

King does this all the time in his stories having character connections across different novels, making them set in the same universe. Fun, adds some depth to all of it. Like Randal Flagg being the same villain in the Stand and the Dark tower and Eyes of the Dragon.

ted_bunny

6 hours ago

Are there any new Eberts? The review landscape feels like it still hasn't exited his shadow but needs to evolve.

jacquesm

an hour ago

You'll never know because there aren't that many good films to review.

Thorrez

8 hours ago

(1999) (The movie is from 1994, the review is from 1999.)

simianwords

7 hours ago

In my opinion, the costs to make movies have gone down so much that you will find sincerity not only in high production value releases but also in YouTube and vlogs.

dylan604

an hour ago

It’s not the cost of movies going down as budgets keep going up. It is the cost of consumer video equipment that has lowered the bar to entry for production. Video equipment never looked as good a film until digital sensors and high speed storage. Not having a delay of getting film exposed and being able to see playback immediately after stopping the camera also lowers expenses.

svag

2 hours ago

I recently saw it as a play in a theater, and although I had my reservations regarding this, the result was an interesting experience. The minimalist staging shifted the focus to the performances and the emotional weight of the story, highlighting the quiet persistence of hope.

The title of the play also differed from the movie, Rita Hayworth: Last Exit, which feels somewhat like a spoiler. I believe this was the title used by the Greek distributor.

delichon

an hour ago

The title of the Stephen King story that the movie is based on is "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption."

blinding-streak

an hour ago

Very strange that the cast list on this web page doesn't include Morgan Freeman.

jcynix

7 hours ago

It's a fine movie, agreed. The movie's focus isn't on revenge, but on the interaction between the protagonists. Anyways, the story outline heavily reminds me of the classic "The Count of Monte Cristo" by Dumas.

Disclaimer: I never read Stephen King's original short story, on which the movie is based, so I cannot say how this compares to Dumas' classic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Count_of_Monte_Cristo

dylan604

an hour ago

There’s a scene in the movie directly acknowledging this when they are sorting the books for the expanded library. Heywood calls it the Count of Monte Crisco by Alexandree Dumbass and Andy says it’s about a prison break. Heywood then suggests it should go in the educational section.

simianwords

7 hours ago

What’s an equivalent movie in contemporary times? Not pretentious, sincere and relies on dialogue and story telling?

I kind of hated movies like Manchester By The Sea, American Sniper, Banshees of Insherin.

They all feel not so sincere to me. There’s something about them - a technique where audience exposition is deliberately toned down to such an extent that it’s just scene after scene with no soul.

somenameforme

16 minutes ago

Parasite was excellent, and even has some of the same themes if you squint hard enough.

isleyaardvark

an hour ago

I rave about "The Secret Agent" (2025) to everyone. It's a slice of life movie about people living under a dictatorship. It's got a lot of heart.

pavlov

7 hours ago

“Sincere” and “authentic” are very much taste factors calibrated by whatever was the media environment when you were growing up.

Most people think the best year in pop music history was the one when they were 12. There’s a similar effect about the good old movies.

fatherwavelet

2 hours ago

It is an objective fact though that the lack of DVD sales on the backend has completely changed the economics of movies and what gets made.

You also can't really compare the 90s to now when music and the movies were the dominate art form and there was no way to get rich and famous from just the internet.

I watched an interview with Jerry Cantrell from Alice in Chains and he said in the late 80s Seatle, he worked at a giant 50 room rehearsal space, almost apartment complex, that was opened 24/7. Music can't be the same as a time when being in a band was so popular that the economics could support a 50 band room rehearsal space that never closes. It is night and day different to now. Same with movies.

simianwords

7 hours ago

I was afraid I was committing the same mistake. Am I just used to the older type of movies? It could be possible.

brookst

an hour ago

Banshees of Insherin is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen. The understatedness is critical to the humor and story; it’s a juxtaposition of boring people in a boring town and the batshit plots that develop.

Other recent greats are maybe Poor Things, Challengers, and Conclave.

You wouldn’t mistake any for Shawshank, but that’s ok, it’s 30 years later. Shawshank is also qualitatively different from great movies in the mid 1960’s, like Dr. Strangelove or The Graduate.

haunter

6 hours ago

Watch japanese films. Or just generally don't watch american films

Kore-eda Hirokazu: Still Walking (2008), Monster (2023), Shoplifters (2018)

Hamaguchi Ryusuke: Drive My Car (2021), Evil Does Not Exist (2023)

A Story of Yonosuke (2013) from Okita Shuichi

Memories of Matsuko (2006) from Nakashima Tetsuya

Departures (2008) from Takita Yojiro

Perfect Days (2023) from Wim Wenders. Even though he is not japanese it's a very japanese film

but there are lot more

rwmj

6 hours ago

You can't mention Kore-eda without mentioning After Life (1998), surely? (Confusingly called Wonderful Life in Japanese, and also I don't mean the Gervais series.)

There's a recent US "remake"/homage which I haven't dared to watch.

haunter

6 hours ago

Yess! So good too. We could probably just recommend all his films

I’d say he is my favorite contemporary director.

The only american director I’d consider right now is Terrence Malick. I just hope his Jesus film gets released…

thomassmith65

7 hours ago

simianwords

7 hours ago

Yes I have watched it and it’s a good match

bji9jhff

7 hours ago

Who is the new Stephen King? I suppose answering my question will automatically also give an answer to yours.

riffraff

6 hours ago

I think this opens a huge can of further questions: what is a Stephen King? Is it a best selling author who's a house name, a very successful genre author, one who spans genres and is successful in all of them, one whose' books get regularly translated to TV, a very good craftman of books that people actually read...

My feeling is that there isn't and _won't be_ a new Stephen King that checks all the boxes, due to declining readership and reduced barriers to independent publishing.

dzink

7 hours ago

I wouldn’t exclude TV shows: Halt and Catch Fire, Dark Matter, Ted Lasso.

ted_bunny

6 hours ago

Ted Lasso comes off as so smarmy that it's insincere to me, like a cynical attempt to ride a wave of New Sincerity.

p-e-w

7 hours ago

About Dry Grasses by Nuri Ceylan. Probably the best film I’ve seen in the past 10 years, which isn’t saying that much because the past 10 years have been among the worst in the history of film, but it’s still a very good movie.