chrisjj
7 hours ago
The section What is considered “Slop"? conspiciously fails to answer this question. It simply describes the recognition of material as "AI-generated".
From SlopStop is Kagi’s community-driven feature for reporting low-quality, mass‑generated AI content (“AI slop”) found in web, image and video search results. one might conclude slop is low-quality, mass‑generated content, but why limit opposition to the subset that's from "AI"?
user
4 hours ago
JohnFen
4 hours ago
> It simply describes the recognition of material as "AI-generated".
That works as a good definition for me. Whether or not you want to call it "slop", anything that helps to filter out AI-generated stuff could be helpful.
My only concern about this is that it seems to rely on user reporting, and if that reporting includes (mistakenly or otherwise) sites that don't have AI generated content, that could make the tool less useful.
chrisjj
2 hours ago
Further info here https://blog.kagi.com/slopstop indicates a key attribute is "deceptive".
I can see this being weaponised against controversial sites made by humans, with no way to prove they are human.
user
24 minutes ago