It's hard for me to comprehend how ublock origin blocks a total of 10 different tracking scripts on your website https://rulebricks.com/ and all you can come up with is a small text in the bottom saying "This website may collect cookies to optimize your user experience".
"May collect cookies"? Do you think google makes money by collecting cookies? You are brazenly lying into my face and even using a dark pattern to hide this ridiculously formulated sentence at the bottom of the screen.
Why does your company decide to employ falsehoods and dark patterns at such an obvious place? It erodes any trust.
The wording has been updated, and we’ll review our instrumentation. Appreciate your feedback.
I like the approach, I’ve been looking for something with a UI but not from a corp compliance perspective; as I scale usage of Claude I am finding permission checks to be a huge pain in the neck. In my circle, you can identify someone who uses the heck out of Claude Code by their use of —dangerously-skip-permissions (I did that with fat fingers but without typos, that’s how often I need it).
> I did that with fat fingers but without typos, that’s how often I need it
You mean you don't just have it aliased to "claude" ?
Guilty as charged
Thoughts on /permissions from the CLI?
Curious to learn if/how folks are using the PreToolUse hook in their own setup
Missing a lot critical commands: like passwd, shutdown, etc
Will extend the decision table template when we can
I really find it disingenuous when Show HNs link to a github that is just a landing page to get you to create an account for their service. Multiple clicks to find that free only covers 100 rule evaluations.