Show HN: OpenWork – An open-source alternative to Claude Cowork

231 pointsposted 24 days ago
by ben_talent

66 Comments

browningstreet

23 days ago

Personally I’m skeptical and a bit dismissive of an insta- clone of commercial offerings. I ignore these things until they’re 3-6 months old and still iterating.

Announcements on their own are like whispers.

exitb

22 days ago

What if the commercial offering was made in less than 2 weeks?

https://x.com/altryne/status/2010811222409756707

bognition

22 days ago

My take on the OP is that its commitment to an idea is what matters, not how quickly its created. I love seeing people insta-clone things but is this a side project that going to see updates for a few weeks or is this something that is going to be maintained actively for years to come.

browningstreet

22 days ago

It's a feature built upon a foundation. Cloning the feature without the foundation isn't the same thing.

ben_talent

22 days ago

Completely understand. It's up to us to keep shippinh and making this actually good during that time!

troyvit

22 days ago

That's a good idea from the user perspective. I jumped on the aider bandwagon and am now dealing with its relative abandonment and deciding if I want to invest time in a fork.

As a movement though it might be something else. To me, Claude is trying to build a moat around tooling, but due to the nature of their own core product that moat is becoming easier and easier to bridge. What does that mean for them?

supriyo-biswas

22 days ago

The uncomfortable truth is that the marginal cost of producing software (if one doesn't care too much about quality or predictability) has now become near zero with AI; and therefore we will see many companies products being challenged in this way. Of course, Anthropic will have a leg up in terms of subsidized models provided along with a subscription, etc.

rhubarbtree

22 days ago

> the marginal cost of producing software (if one doesn't care too much about quality or predictability) has now become near zero with AI;

Hell of a caveat. I'd also add "complex functionality" to that list.

louis030195

23 days ago

Looks great. I don't use opencode myself but like a lot Claude skills, agents, I have like 50 different ones for personal life, work, dating, whatever Is there integration with Claude skills?

Have you considered using or integrating with ACP? https://zed.dev/acp

We use it in our desktop app IDE (mediar.ai) and it's pretty good

xyzsparetimexyz

23 days ago

Dating??? Christ, this planet is cooked.

louis030195

22 days ago

i use dating skill to update my dating CRM (md notes) and my dating dashboard

recently i have been working on a dating skill so AI book the right place based on each other personality using computer use

fcarraldo

22 days ago

please disclose this to the people you’re dating

adastra22

22 days ago

Please tell me this is a joke.

kevmo314

23 days ago

Surely that is a joke… I hope…

dotancohen

23 days ago

Early on I asked ChatGPT 4 what women actually want. I actually got some advice that was quite helpful.

contagiousflow

22 days ago

Alternatively, think about asking the women in your life what they want

dotancohen

21 days ago

Of course. I think that communication is the key to a successful relationship.

However Henry Ford has a well known quote about what people think they want vs what they really want. For that matter, think about how you would answer a question about what you want, vs what you really value to experience in a relationship.

sofixa

22 days ago

While this is generally good advice, it only works if you have women you're close with, at that level, already. If the only women you know are work colleagues, you can't go around asking them for advice on dating (depends on your relationship with them of course, but usually, not work appropriate).

contagiousflow

22 days ago

Perhaps that is part of the problem. Talking to women outside of romantic interest might be a good first step

sofixa

22 days ago

Yes, but that's not useful advice to someone who currently has none.

contagiousflow

19 days ago

My point being, maybe other things are foundational to building a romantic life upon. Not saying it is a must but building friendships with all sorts of people will generally help with many aspects of life

8note

22 days ago

id imagine a skill like "book a restaurant, and update my calendar"

verdverm

22 days ago

I'm imagining an ADK swipe skill

philipwhiuk

22 days ago

What's the security boundary here - there's no mention of a VM or anything to isolate the agent from the file system?

mhyatt000

14 days ago

i think the point is to access the filesystem. move stuff around write rename etc.

jannesblobel

19 days ago

A current concern of mine, also when using Claude Cowork, is that I don’t want files to be modified if I can’t control their versions/ if they aren’t versioned at all.

And even though it doesn’t actually get full sudo access, giving an LLM permission to edit files without being able to track exactly what it’s doing still feels risky.

McAdam

23 days ago

Still feels a bit technical. The Claude approach is designed for "Susan in Accounting" - what thoughts do you have to reduce the technical barriers?

ben_talent

23 days ago

Yeah it is still too technical.

First obvious stuff like getting the dmg notarized having easier install.

Then after it will be about optimizing onboarding. One of the core goals is to help Susan do 1 small task in under 5 min.

To do that we will need to: - have some prepackaged configs for folks like starter template - ship opencode within the app itself so users don't need to manually install it - and get rid of the technical jargon that is cluttered in the app.

kewun

22 days ago

I wonder if most "Susan in Accounting" even know what Claude is. They then have to know to get Claude desktop, get the max plan in order to get Cowork. Most people live on the cloud, so they'll need to get the Claude browser plugin as well to integrate with Cowork.

I'm curious to see if Anthropic can actually win over these non-technical folks as there's still quite a few hurdles for them to get over.

yowlingcat

23 days ago

Great stuff and very timely. I just started getting into using opencode and while I'm hugely optimistic about its capabilities and can use it personally without too much sweat, I was left hoping for something a bit more batteries included to give to my non technical colleagues so we can collaborate together. This looks to be exactly what we were looking for so I am looking forward to giving it a spin!

ben_talent

23 days ago

Yeah ! I feel like until we figure out the correct UX for non-technical people the right way would be a sort of hybrid. Where you'd set it up on a remote server (if you know opencode you know openwork) and you just then have non-tech people do a one time setup to connect to the remote and from then on you can easily extend capabilities.

yowlingcat

21 days ago

This is the approach that I've taken with Open WebUI. It's a great piece of software for exposing a shared GPT interface but of course that's pretty primitive in the grand scheme of things compared to something like this. But I completely agree with what you're suggesting and I think it's the only practical way to get a multi disciplinary team collaborating with this kind of a tool.

herrkaefer

16 days ago

Came up with the same idea this morning and worked half day to get a working version. Then I saw this post.

Will like to contribute.

user

22 days ago

[deleted]

snow_mac

22 days ago

Created two days ago.... Did you use Claude Code to generate the open source code? :P

stingraycharles

22 days ago

I believe Anthropic was saying that they created Claude Work using Claude Code as well, in about a week.

NamlchakKhandro

22 days ago

I don't understand the point when opencode desktop already exists.

rose8

23 days ago

sounds cool! I'm non technical, I get the workflow with controling home assistant. How could I use this at work? Like how could the workflow be between marketing and devs, for example, for website work, can I change content without dealing with GitHub?

NSPG911

23 days ago

how does it compare to opencode's own gui that uses tauri?

saadn92

22 days ago

Nice job! How were you able to get it out so quickly?

gvv

22 days ago

"Claude build me a Claude Cowork clone, make no mistakes"

kevinoconnell

23 days ago

yo this is so sick, could def incorporate this into my workflow

ben_talent

23 days ago

let me know if you need help, still a bit rough around the edges

torstenvl

23 days ago

This isn't open source.

ben_talent

23 days ago

Oh damn thanks for flagging. I just added an MIT license.

gus_massa

23 days ago

Beware that the readme.md still says "TBD" at the bottom.

user

23 days ago

[deleted]

imiric

23 days ago

The word "open" in software names has completely lost its meaning.

ben_talent

23 days ago

I used "open" because: - it's open source - built on top of open source (opencode) - it's built-around extensibility via plain-text files (skills) and open-source plugins

verdverm

22 days ago

If everyone put "open" in their project's name because it was open source, almost all the software we use would have "open" in the name

The open source / open plugins / text files is not unique to your project. The majority of the ai tooling space is open in the same way

dmd

23 days ago

How much more open do you want it to be? It’s MIT licensed.

user

22 days ago

[deleted]