epolanski
2 days ago
I liked the path windows was going in late 2010s. WSL, power toys, many great utils, great performance.
But it has since then stalled and got increasingly worse. Especially with this AI shoving everywhere, not even mentioning getting ads at some point in notifications and start menu.
I'm not particularly in love with MacOS either (but have no realistic alternative on my MacBooks).
I'm more and more inclined of switching my desktop (my main working machine) to Omarchy, two coworkers in my team use it and love it and seems the sweet spot for what I need as a dev without the annoyance of Windows or the god awful macos.
hshdhdhj4444
2 days ago
If you want an OS to simply do stuff Linux is now clearly superior.
However, I found Omarchy to be whatever the opposite of a sweet spot is. It brings all the complications of a tiling WM, so you still have to learn a complicated new way of using your system, but at the same time it is extremely opinionated so instead of ending with a tailored custom tiling WM that suits your needs at the end of the learning curve, you end up with a tiling WM that is suited for someone else’s needs.
On the flip side, the simplifications it does add, such as a supposedly easier way to add packages, does no such thing. It doesn’t simplify the process at all and in fact makes it harder to understand how to actually remove stuff.
jaredhallen
a day ago
I love Linux. I've been using it for about 25 years now. I try to be a realist, and historically, it has always been my opinion that it is a less polished experience, suitable mainly for power users. But my opinion now is that many flavors actually do offer a superior desktop user experience for most use cases.
LexiMax
14 hours ago
This might not be a popular opinion, but in my experience stock GNOME is quite the polished experience.
In the grand pantheon of my experience using operating systems, Snow Leopard-era macOS is probably my favorite, mostly due to how smoothly everything worked and the degree to which it got out of my way once I learned the ropes, but GNOME circa Fedora 30 was a close second.
I say stock because I also remember trying out Ubuntu-flavored GNOME at around the same time and the comparison was stark. It felt like Cannonical went out of their way to tweak the environment in ways that sound good on paper, but just added papercuts and made the overall experience less stable.
I also remember trying Manjaro at around the same time. On first boot, the welcome popup that was designed to come out of the taskbar instead popped out of the top left corner of the screen.
doubleg72
a day ago
Same here, we’ve hit parity with Windows
aeon_ai
2 days ago
To each their own.
I find Omarchy to simply "make sense" out of the box for me. And, I've never used a tiling WM before it (and feel crazy for not having done so)
hshdhdhj4444
a day ago
I guess that’s the difference.
I have used a tiling WM before.
So I wonder whether the benefits you’re seeing in Omarchy are simply the result of using a tiling WM for the first time, which overrode what I believe Omarchy detracted from a general tiling WM.
Or whether my poorer experience was a result of the fact that having used a tiling WM I was more comfortable customizing and so found the Omarchy opinionated behavior restrictive or if the benefits Omarchy brings to someone who’s new to a tiling WM are lost on me.
spikej
2 days ago
Even without the AI, it's replacing native apps with web based ones. Case in point: Notepad. It's slower than WordPad on Win 10... and crashes!
ncpa-cpl
2 days ago
And Calc! It takes about 5 seconds to load. And search is so unreliable mixing web and local results.
kyboren
2 days ago
I've been pretty much exclusively Linux-based for over a decade now, but I used every version of Windows from 3.11 to Windows 7, so I still have some muscle memory from the good ol' days.
Recently I was helping a relative do something on their Windows 11 machine and I asked them to press Windows key + R, type calc, press Enter. And I was astonished at the result. Literally: Mouth agape, frozen in astonishment for about 10 seconds.
I knew about the ads and tracking and the local account bullshit, but I didn't realize just how bad the Windows experience has become.
netsharc
2 days ago
What does happen? I'm using Windows 10 Enterprise (is that GitHub repo to activate any license still around?) , with policy to disable Internet search from the start menu... so your story makes me wonder what the astonishment is.
rstuart4133
2 days ago
I had a similar experience to the OP. After a new version of Windows I tried to run something, or maybe it was just pressing the Start button, and I waited, mouth open, wondering what in $DIETY's name was happening before it responded. The pause was completely alien to a Linux user, who is used to the Window manager unconditionally responding instantly. It would be alien to users of older versions of Windows too.
I decided in the end it was pulling down stuff from the web - in tiles it displayed beside the start menu. If you were on a fast network and had a good internet connection the problem mostly went away. The feature was inherited from WinPhone, I think. So it wasn't that the underling OS or video had got slower, it was them bolting on irrelevant crap to the menu. I later got smarter and deleted all the tiles, so only the menu was displayed. That improved things considerably. I remain gob smacked at them crippling their product like that.
I'm try to avoid Windows now, and am mostly successful. But I read these stories about them adding AI and ads into the mix. If they bolted them into basic window functions like the start menu in the same idiotic way, I could well believe Microsoft has release the slowest Windows ever despite it running on the fastest hardware the planet has seen.
agumonkey
2 days ago
I'm betting a very large loading time.
ipdashc
2 days ago
Bit of a clickbaity way of phrasing it, but I'm also curious what the result was? From googling it I don't see any stories about recent changes to the calculator app, other than a few features like graphing.
kyboren
a day ago
I'm sorry, I wasn't intentionally trying to write clickbait, I was just agreeing with the parent and did not consider how it would come off to other parties.
What happens is the calculator window pops up ~immediately, but the entire contents of the window are a stupid logo--for at least 5 full seconds--until the UI elements actually load and you can actually use the calculator to calculate things.
The most basic thing our PCs do is they calculate. The Intel 4004 was designed... for a calculator. calc.exe, that erstwhile snappy, lightweight native Win32 application is now apparently some Electron abomination with a footprint the size of Windows 98 and a launch time to match.
ipdashc
a day ago
No worries! Sorry, I phrased that rudely / like an accusation.
That makes sense though. Yeah, it is really depressing. I guess they just don't prioritize start time at all. The hilarious part is, like... Blender on my computer starts up almost instantly! Versus a calculator...
Rohansi
2 days ago
I just tried it on regular Windows 11 Pro and it just opened the calculator.
novaleaf
2 days ago
I bet the friend just pressed the Windows key, and typing "Calc" and quickly pressing enter caused Bing to search for calc instead. Common failure because window's start-menu search/load/discovery is a total mess.
Rohansi
2 days ago
Even in this case it opens the calculator. Web search results are further down.
novaleaf
16 hours ago
if you are searching for something for the first time (or after caching invalidates), it seems like it prioritizes search sources that have already completed.
on my computer, that means web-search almost always completes first. So most of the time if I type in something "new" and don't wait, it'll bring up Bing.
Sometimes it looks like "downloads folder" file search completes before Installed app search completes, because on one occasion I typed in an app's name and it launched the INSTALLER for the app.
once all the searchs resolve it behaves "as expected". I am very surprised if you don't have the same symptoms I'm describing. Why is your computer behaving different from every Win11 install I ever interact with?
Rohansi
11 hours ago
I just tried a search for "downloads" and the first result was "Downloads folder privacy settings". I never search for that so it wasn't cached. I even pasted in the query to give it less time to search before pressing enter.
I don't think I've changed any settings for search. Everything is still enabled. There's over 250,000 items in the search index so I haven't removed indexed locations. My computer is pretty much a high-end gaming PC using last generation CPU and GPU. But really I've never seen this behavior anywhere - including my very basic laptop. Maybe I could see this happening on computers that are still using a HDD but I haven't tested that.
rleigh
2 days ago
If it loads at all. The last two days, the start menu refuses to launch it when you click on it.
The lack of quality in Windows is simply astonishing. And the new start menu and taskbar are terrible. Quite how a company can transform a product into such a mess in just a few years is incredible.
lossyalgo
2 days ago
I love when it takes 3 minutes to open "Add or Remove Programs" because the Start menu search decides that typing a, ad, add, r, re, remove, unin, install, etc. definitely means "let me Bing that for you" instead of opening the one thing I clearly want.
It obviously knows what I'm trying to do (Bing search recommendation is for "Add or Remove Programs"), yet refuses to surface the actual shortcut to that settings page (or "app", or whatever Microsoft calls it this week). Even better: some days it pops up immediately after typing "Add" and other days I'm wrestling with it like I'm training a stubborn animal, clicking the result in the hope that the OS will "learn" that yes, this is what I want when I type "Add".
Most of the time I just give up and dig through the Settings menu like it's 1999.
dmitrygr
2 days ago
I still use a copy of Calc.EXE from Windows 2000 that I just move from machine to machine. It stopped being useful after that. That old one is nice. Hex mode. Starts quickly.
RankingMember
2 days ago
If I could get regular security updates for Windows 2000 I might still be using it- peak Windows
netsharc
2 days ago
I wonder if it's ancient enough that the exploits floating online are too modern for it...
Hah, I guess the Internet really is like a sewer, you have to have good protective equipment to wade in it...
dmitrygr
2 days ago
This reasoning is actually why I ran Windows XP 64 bit edition for very very long. Most exploits found that it was XP and tried to do stuff and failed on the 64 bit kernel they did not expect.
kyboren
a day ago
I'm not going to say that's a good idea, but I've long had an idea along similar lines that a source-only distribution that generates a bespoke calling convention, stack frame layout, syscall number mapping, etc. for each individual machine at install time would do a lot to mitigate RCE threats.
spwa4
2 days ago
I have a derive.exe from 1996 that I still use. TI's calculator, as an incredibly fast windows app that's like 20% of wolframalpha.
And to think on all "modern" OSes you can't even do that. Neither Android nor IOS let you do this in any way shape or form. Even with portable webapps it doesn't work, as webapps go offline. And microsoft clearly wants to create this situation too (last brute force attempt was windows home)
dmitrygr
2 days ago
you can also "add to homescreen" on iOS/android and it acts like a native app & works offline. symbolic math - computer algebra system, integration/differentiation, finance app in rom, 3d graphs.
(emu is not my work, i only packaged it for PWA and host it for myself to use, but you are welcome to as well)
phonon
2 days ago
Derive is more sophisticated. TI-89/92/Nspire is close though.
dmitrygr
2 days ago
Derive doesn’t run on my iPhone sadly
spwa4
a day ago
Sure (and thanks for the link, do you have a TI-82 as well?) but it won't "last". You'll take the site offline, sooner or later and I can't just store an exe locally and use it in 20 years. I'll lose the ability to install it on phones.
dmitrygr
a day ago
That is my personal site, I do not expect to take it down, since that is where I post my projects. But also, you can just save it from there entirely, and serve from your own site -- there is no server-side part to it.
no 82. I only liked the ti-89
BoredPositron
2 days ago
Best part is that on a fresh install without internet you are not able to use it...well all of the modern replacement apps.
pacifika
a day ago
Yeah first time Windows Clock wouldn’t restore because the net wasn’t ready I was shocked
pjmlp
2 days ago
It was rewritten into WinUI, hence why.
derf_
a day ago
I do not know anything about this team, but I worked with a team before that migrated from a native app to an Electron-based version. It was worse in literally every way except one: the developers on that team preferred developing that way. Nothing else mattered.
The kind of developers who are willing to work with native GUI APIs (even though a framework) simply don't exist in enough quantity anymore.
pico303
2 days ago
I remember reading that even the Start menu is now a React app.
hshdhdhj4444
2 days ago
Apparently this is not entirely true. It’s just a section of the start menu that’s based on React/React Native.
zaruvi
2 days ago
Regardless, at least a few of my colleagues using Windows have reported issues with the new start menu. It seems very slow, and sometimes you have to close & reopen it for content to appear.
lossyalgo
2 days ago
Searching for things via the Start menu is also totally hit or miss, on 5 different PCs that I regularly use, especially trying to open "Add or Remove Programs" (as described in an earlier comment).
hshdhdhj4444
a day ago
Oh completely agreed on the start menu being slower.
I don’t use it anymore. Fortunately since my windows usage is restricted only to work and I have an ultra wide monitor, I’m able to pin all the apps I need on the taskbar. With the Win + # shortcuts I can avoid the start menu completely.
In the past I didn’t use the taskbar at all and depended on Win + search entirely.
ziml77
2 days ago
React Native*
pxoe
2 days ago
What does notepad have to do with web based apps? case in what point?
New Notepad in 11, with tabs and autosave (and dark mode), is so much better and more practical to use over old one, it just stays open all the time and become my main notetaking pick. It may take a beat to open a big file (1+ mb) with line wrapping, but it's pretty much just as fast as anything (and may be even faster than some other editors). It's just very easy to reach for and quite snappy.
There are some apps on Windows with actual gripes, but Notepad, Paint, Snipping tool, they're quite solid and have become everyday tools that eliminated the need to reach for some other third party apps.
novaleaf
2 days ago
I see you were fortunate enough to not use notepad aprox 5 months ago, when they were running the rich formatting preview. It was on by default, and would drop around 5% of the characters you type. Literally failing at the only thing it's supposed to do. I repro'd this on 2 out of 2 machines.
Maybe they fixed it, maybe they haven't. I both turned off formatting and am using vscode for notes now.
brewmarche
2 days ago
I think I had to disable spellcheck to fix the ignored keystrokes, it happened even after disabling formatting
novaleaf
a day ago
ahh, it might have been spellcheck then. I turned off all that stuff. In the heat of the moment, maybe I was a bit too angry to do proper root cause analysis :P
tartoran
2 days ago
I've been a Notepad++ user for about 20 years. It's a pain to use it in Win11 as they force their crappy notepad on context menus and such. It's still usable (with some registry changes) but annoying that they're doogfooding their own an keep on changing settings on updates. I'm only using Win11 at work, I'm done with Windows and MS otherwise.
itopaloglu83
2 days ago
Yes, some nice to have features were added, but it’s a text editing app, and not a good one at that, so it shouldn’t be crashing like that.
api
2 days ago
The reason for this is that it's hard to hire native UI developers, but easy to hire web devs.
Something like 90% of all new devs today learn only cloud-native backend dev or web frontend dev. The only exceptions tends to be mobile and game developers. Collectively cloud+web, mobile, and games account for like 98% of all new devs it seems. Nobody learns anything else.
The web is going to become the desktop UI in the future for this reason alone. It's going to be slower and much more bloated than almost any other alternative, but it's got the critical mass of adoption behind it and that's what determines core technologies in the industry. Technical merit is a distant second or third.
This is frustrating but it's not surprising to one who has studied biology and evolution. In evolution this is called "path dependence," and it's why we have weird things like a man's testicles hanging in a bag below his body. A previous evolutionary path optimized the sperm production process to run at a lower temperature than the rest of the body, so then evolution's hack for this is to put them in a bag outside the body. Ticket closed with "resolved." The pathways taken through a complex solution space determine the outcome and the outcome is often bizarre and "hacky" for this reason. The key is that it's very hard to back-track. Once a path has been taken, it's very hard to un-take it.
Large industries and markets are essentially "biological," not rationally designed, so you get the same kinds of phenomena.
It could be much worse. If Linux+HTML+JS had not taken over, we might have the Microsoft Enterprise Web(tm) where Visual Basic (not VB.NET, OG Visual Basic) is the main language and each service or site would require an NT license for every node and an IIS license for every web hostname. UIs might be written in ActiveX or desktop ones in Microsoft C/C++ with OLE and similar horrors. It might be just as slow and infinitely uglier and more expensive and less open. Apple would be dead and open source would much more marginalized than it is today. The net would basically be a total MS monopoly. If you didn't live through the 90s: this nearly happened.
eXpl0it3r
2 days ago
In my opinion this is mostly self-inflicted by Microsoft.
Sure some push for web-based solution has moved a lot of people away from desktop applications, but even before that Microsoft muddied the waters of native UI development.
Moving from User32.dll and GDI to GPU based rendering with WPF, might not have been the worst idea - and WPF is still going strong - but it's a clear cut, leaving old apps un-upgradable. So if companies need to eventually rewrite it, will they stick with desktop apps or move to "web apps"?
Unfortunately, Microsoft didn't stop there, but we've since seen a bunch of different attempts at new Windows UI libs to the point, where nobody trusts Microsoft anymore (remember Silverlight?) and everyone else is left confused by the chaos of an ecosystem.
PlanksVariable
2 days ago
Why can’t Microsoft employees learn on the job? When I joined a (non-Microsoft) BigTech company, I was expected to learn C++ and internal libraries and tools within a couple months while working on newbie projects. The company recouped that investment many times over.
avidphantasm
2 days ago
There is a lot of idiocy/stubbornness among middle managers. I worked for a large consulting firm for a few years and would see hiring managers pass by candidates with good aptitude whom they could’ve trained in 4-6 weeks. Instead, they had the position open for several months waiting for someone who knew the exact technologies they were using and still didn’t find anyone in some cases. Seemed to me that the middle managers need more tolerance for non-billable time. But when everyone is incentivized to meet quarterly goals, this is what you get.
ipdashc
2 days ago
My thoughts as well. And it's not like we're talking about taking random people off the street and teaching them to program, it's just a UI framework. And the stuff people are talking about in here isn't IDEs or CAD suites, it's like... the calculator app and the start menu. What kind of devs is MSFT hiring and paying $200k a year that can't learn a UI framework?
conradfr
2 days ago
That can work if you're not expecting to be fired on a whim in one of those 20k+ layoffs when suddenly you have a skill no one seeks while you have not grown in the other area the market wants.
wtetzner
11 hours ago
There are still plenty of C++ jobs available.
Scubabear68
2 days ago
> The reason for this is that it's hard to hire native UI developers, but easy to hire web devs
Funny. Back in the 90s Microsoft just hired kind of random kids from college to write their OS in C.
runako
2 days ago
This is directionally not totally off-base, but:
> it's hard to hire native UI developers
This is the pool of mobile devs. If Microsoft is unwilling to eat the lead time (measured in weeks) for an existing native mobile dev to become productive on their stack, that's a sign of much bigger organizational problems.
ivm
a day ago
Yup, coming from iOS and Android, I learned most of WinUI in two weeks, even before LLMs. GUI frameworks are largely similar, so there’s no real justification for reimplementing single-platform applications with HTML.
SilasX
2 days ago
>The reason for this is that it's hard to hire native UI developers, but easy to hire web devs.
This ... has been very opposite of my experience:
1) I've seen websites turn into poor imitations of mobile apps that lose all the features of web UIs that I want: ability to open links in tabs, use of affordances to scroll up and down, dense packing of information, ability to edit the size, etc. (Edit: almost forgot how they run the back button too!)
2) Generally, I see that the more UI specialists they have, the worse the UI gets. There's the saying, "developers are responsible for mediocre UIs, designers are responsible for horrible UIs".
mhjkl
2 days ago
The reason is that the web empire is just better at operating systems than Microsoft. If they just had less bad development tools for native UI this would not be a problem. Look at what Google does with Android, or Apple.
ivm
a day ago
WinUI 3 was pretty decent even back in 2021, and much easier to learn than the clusterfuck of Android SDK.
pjmlp
2 days ago
Excuses, a $4 trillion valued company can surely afford some training on the technology it owns.
tarsinge
a day ago
The analogy with evolution breaks down because currently the fitness function is broken. It would work in a world where anti trust would be still enforced, where customers could vote with their money instead of having to deal with enshitiffied monopolies. In a world where tech CEOs can buy a dinner to stay above the law, where tech is used as a weapon of influence so that other countries like in the EU are not allowed under penalty of sanctions to not use US platforms even when it breaks their law, it is reassuring for engineer minds but ultimately pointless to explain the state of the industry from market dynamics alone.
secondcoming
2 days ago
That makes little sense, notepad.exe already exists. The only development required on it would be to add AI shit to it. They could just leave it alone.
api
2 days ago
That means you have to work on the original code, and modern entry-mid level devs can't do that. It's probably in C++. Your expensive senior and staff level devs are on more important projects.
Make it a web app and your cheap entry level grads can do it.
buttercraft
2 days ago
Notepad was basically the "Hello world" of win32 apps. A kid in highschool could have "maintained" it.
j1elo
2 days ago
My first entry-level job just freshly coming out of the University was writing C++ with Qt for a computer vision app. And that was my actual first contact with C++ (had seen C and Java in Uni).
It was no biggie, just joining the low level of C with the class notions from Java. Pair that with the C++FAQ website, and it was easy.
Are entry-level devs generally not able to do that nowadays? I do not believe people are generally more stupid or less capable, so, is education so much worse or what's going on?
bathtub365
2 days ago
Shouldn’t the AI technology that Microsoft is spending billions on make this trivial?
ada0000
2 days ago
Microsoft has the resources to train people.
HPsquared
2 days ago
But does any junior want to learn C++ Win32? You want to learn something that leads to a long-term career development path, not a sunsetting technology.
ada0000
2 days ago
They would want to learn Winforms/WPF/WinUI/whatever if microsoft could settle on one and use it. I suppose part of the react native stuff is that Microsoft hasn’t done a good job of making people, even in Microsoft, bet the farm on any of their “native” toolkits.
0cf8612b2e1e
2 days ago
For money, anything is possible. That’s the employment contract, trade money for time doing things you would rather not.
HPsquared
2 days ago
Indeed but if the pay needs to be high, you may as well pay someone experienced.
nineteen999
a day ago
The delulu who think C/C++ is "sunsetting". Hilarious.
wtetzner
11 hours ago
> But does any junior want to learn C++ Win32?
I'm pretty sure Microsoft can pay them enough to be happy to learn it.
> You want to learn something that leads to a long-term career development path, not a sunsetting technology.
This seems like such an odd take when web frameworks seem to be obsolete almost as soon as you start using them. C++ has and will continue to be around for a very long time.
This is just the result of bad leadership at Microsoft.
hulitu
2 days ago
> But does any junior want to learn C++ Win32?
That's why they got the job, didn't they ? /s
secondcoming
2 days ago
But there's no need to change it, that's the point. It's a finished product pretty much. Just ship it as is.
If a PM needs NotepadAI for their career progression then start it from scratch.
hulitu
2 days ago
> That means you have to work on the original code, and modern entry-mid level devs can't do that. It's probably in C++.
As far as I remember, Notepad was the reference implementation for a Microsoft widget. Nothing more. If "modern entry-mid level devs can't do that" you really have a much bigger problem.
dmitrygr
2 days ago
I don’t think you understand. Notepad was literally one of the examples that comes with the SDK. It doesn’t need any maintenance. As long as windows has a native SDK, notepad exists because it is basically the simplest GUI application, provided as a sample.
emeril
2 days ago
web is, frighteningly, much faster and more responsive than local desktop apps are now (e.g., gmail is infinitely more responsive than desktop modern outlook generally speaking - even web spreadsheets are superior to modern Excel (though not, say, Excel 2003...))
anthk
2 days ago
Linux? You mean the C nest? KDE and QT (the default serious framework) with C++?
You pushed ActiveX on the web, and viceversa with IE4 and Windows98. Now, the web turd came back with Electron. If any, thanks Microsoft for that.
hulitu
2 days ago
> The reason for this is that it's hard to hire native UI developers
Yeah, it's a wonder they were able to do it so many years (ftom win 1.0 to Win 8).
steve1977
2 days ago
I for one like the comparison of web apps with scrotums
Rohansi
2 days ago
But Notepad is not web based? It's still a native app but now uses UWP instead.
pjmlp
2 days ago
Which is exactly the problem, and isn't UWP, rather WinUI/WinAppSDK, the WinRT version on top of Win32, instead of UWP.
UWP is actually faster, yes that is that bad.
da_grift_shift
2 days ago
UWP, one of the 10+ frameworks used to run Windows 11's system components. Wonderful! Exemplary!
https://old.reddit.com/r/Windows11/comments/o2a0kp/there_are...
Rohansi
2 days ago
Those are design languages/styles, not frameworks. There is a fewer number of frameworks but it's still a handful. Win32, WPF, UWP, MAUI, etc... but at least they're fairly consistent at using UWP for system UI, with older bits using Win32 still.
SilasX
2 days ago
This. It was infuriating to find Notepad got updated to a bloated app with rich text and Copilot. It's so different, it just should have been another program. The whole reason I use Notepad is because it's a simple, dumb, fast, predictable program. If I wanted the rich text, I would use any of the numerous other options!
And for the kicker, the update made it forget my font settings.
wtetzner
10 hours ago
Wasn't Wordpad the rich text editor on Windows?
mrec
2 days ago
Re "just another program" - the old Notepad was deliberately designed with minimal dependencies so that even if everything else in the system went to hell you'd still have a working editor to try and fix things.
baal80spam
2 days ago
I recommend https://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html - it's even snappier than Notepad++
uxcolumbo
2 days ago
Use MetaPad - like Notepad.
thunky
2 days ago
> I'm more and more inclined of switching my desktop (my main working machine) to Omarchy
Never heard of it and the website and GitHub repo sure aren't doing a great job of describing it's benefits.
"Beautiful, Modern & Opinionated" are vague and really aren't adjectives I'd be looking for in an OS.
wackget
2 days ago
When anything is described as "opinionated" I just read it as "wilfully inflexible".
theParadox42
2 days ago
It’s opinionated coming from Arch Linux. Compared to MacOS or Windows it’s a big giant push over. Opinionated in this context just means it comes with defaults rather than asking you to research your own display compositor.
TomatoCo
2 days ago
Although there are some places you want that! WireGuard is often described as cryptographically opinionated because it doesn't even bother trying to negotiate crypto primitives which makes it immune to downgrade attacks. Though, to be fair, that also means that if its primitives ever do get broken you need to roll out an entirely new release.
zemo
2 days ago
opinionated versus unopinionated is a tradeoff. Things that boast about how unopinionated they are often require a lot of hand holding or manual config. I think there's a big audience of people that have non-Appleware that want an OS that is not Windows, but don't actually care to customize it.
throw4r5t6y3
a day ago
It’s by David Heinemeier Hansson. Based on his writings, he’s very inflexible. He’s even unwilling to accept that a person of color who was born and raised in Britain can be British.
kombine
2 days ago
I would instead recommend going for Fedora KDE Edition which will give you state of the art Linux desktop experience.
itbeho
2 days ago
I've been daily driving it for months now and really like it. It's a nice introduction to tiling window managers, has a well thought out key mapping and generally looks reasonably nice while getting out of my way as an embedded dev.
nemomarx
2 days ago
There's always been Arch linux based distros that come with more things set up and better (or just more specific) defaults. To my understanding Omarchy is just one of those, like Manjaro or etc in the past?
deng
2 days ago
Yeah, it's just one of those, but worse. It's basically run by a bunch of badly written bash scripts:
pbohun
2 days ago
It sounds weird to say, but Steve Ballmer was probably the best CEO of Microsoft.
hackyhacky
2 days ago
Or: Steve Ballmer oversaw the decline of Mircosoft's flagship product, but left before he could be blamed for it.
A lot of Windows' current problems can be traced back to the Ballmer era, including the framework schizophrenia, as Microsoft shifted between Win32, UWP, WPF, and god knows what else. This has lead to the current chaotic and disjointed UI experience, and served to confuse and drive away developers. Repeatedly sacrificing reliable and consistent UX while chasing shiny and new technologies is no way to run an OS.
drnick1
2 days ago
I think MS's biggest mistake was to not properly maintain and develop the Foundation Classes, basically a thin C++ wrapper library on top of the C API that retained most of the benefits of the Win32 API while eliminating a lot of the boilerplate code. Instead they went after Java with the .NET managed stuff, bloated and slow compared to the native API.
Qt is now the best "old school" UI framework by far.
franktankbank
2 days ago
Experimentation is a cost center?
schmuckonwheels
2 days ago
>including the framework schizophrenia, as Microsoft shifted between Win32, UWP, WPF
Ah yes, and the solution being presented is Linux, with Xlib, Motif, Qt, GTK, and your choice of 167 different desktop environments. Don't forget the whole Wayland schism.
Mac is no better, shifting SDKs every few years, except Apple goes one step further by breaking all legacy applications so you are forced to upgrade. Can't be schizo when you salt the earth and light a match to everything that came before the Current Thing.
steve1977
2 days ago
macOS has Cocoa since 2000, which is still useable, and SwiftUI since a few years. No comparison to the mess of UI toolkits on Windows.
schmuckonwheels
2 days ago
And what about Carbon?
Gone.
32-bit apps?
Gone.
PowerPC stuff? Anything more than a few years old?
Forget it.
You can't even run versions of iPhoto or iTunes after they deliberately broke them and replaced them with objectively shittier equivalents. Their own apps!
Windows can still run programs from the 90s unmodified. There are VB6 apps from 1998 talking to Access databases still running small businesses today.
Can't say the same for either Mac or Linux.
It's not really a problem for Apple because their userbase is content to re-buy all their software every 5 years.
steve1977
2 days ago
Well, that's true. It's an interesting point actually. Windows certainly wins in terms of binary compatibility.
I was thinking more about the developer perspective, i.e. churn in terms of frameworks. Yes, PowerPC is gone. Intel will be gone soon.
But both the transitions from PowerPC to Intel as well as from Intel to ARM were pretty straightforward for developers if you were using Cocoa and not doing any assembly stuff.
Carbon only every was a bandaid to give devs some time for the transition to Cocoa.
schmuckonwheels
2 days ago
Maybe I am a bit jaded, but with Apple's yearly OS release cycle — and breaking things nearly every time — I grew sick and tired of software I spent good money or relied on suddenly not working anymore.
Imagine taking your car in for an oil change annually and the radio stopped working when you got it back. It's incompatible with the new oil, they say. You'd be furious.
With the Windows of yore this wasn't so much of an issue — with 5-10 years between upgrade cycles — and service packs in between — you could space it out.
When you work in the computer industry, there tends to be a disconnect with how they are used in the real world by real people — as tools. People grow accustomed to their tools and expect them to be reliable as opposed to some ephemeral service.
seanmcdirmid
2 days ago
Is that a good or bad thing? Yes, Mac chops off legacy after a decade or so, but I don’t see not being able to run apps from the 90s as a problem (or if I did, I’d probably be running windows or Linux instead of Mac OS).
josefx
2 days ago
> Can't say the same for either Mac or Linux.
From my own experience things tend to keep working on Linux if you package your own userland libraries instead of depending on the ever changing system libraries. More or less how you would do it on Windows.
Except Windows isn't perfect either, I had to deal with countless programs that required an ancient version of the c runtime, some weird database libraries that weren't installed by default and countless other Microsoft dependencies that somehow weren't part of the ever growing bloat.
addaon
2 days ago
> 32-bit apps?
The Core 2 Duo, used in the last 32 bit Mac, was released in 2006.
> PowerPC stuff?
The last G5 PowerPCs were, similarly, discontinued in 2006.
> every 5 years.
20?
schmuckonwheels
2 days ago
Your stance is all software should die as soon as the generation of chip it was developed on stops being sold?
addaon
2 days ago
Sorry, I see how my post might have been somewhat unclear. No, my stance is that 2006 is closer to 20 years ago than 5 years ago.
lossyalgo
2 days ago
Even WinAmp 2.0 from 1998 still runs on Windows 11.
hulitu
2 days ago
> Windows can still run programs from the 90s unmodified.
Did _you_ tried ? Because i hear this mantra a lot on HN, but my experience is different. MDK ( the game) cannot _run_ on a current Windows.
tavavex
a day ago
Although it's rare for me, I have used some old software that was built for Windows 9X or old versions of NT. So far, the track record is perfect - native programs have worked just fine, though I obviously can't vouch for all of them.
Old, complex games are the worst-case scenario, and are the exception, not the rule. Since they were only beginning to figure out hardware-accelerated 3D gaming in the 90s, it meant that we were left with lots of janky implementations and outdated graphics APIs that were quickly forgotten about. Though, MDK doesn't seem to suffer from this - it should be capable of running on newer systems directly [1]. One big issue it does have is that it uses a 16-bit installer, which is one thing that was explicitly retired during the transition to 64-bit due to it being so archaic at that moment, only being relevant to Windows 1-3. But you can still install the game using the method described in the article, and it should hopefully run fine from there on. Since it has options to use a software renderer and old DirectX, at least one of these should work.
lossyalgo
2 days ago
I use WinAmp 2.0 sometimes which was released in 1996. I prefer to use v5 but I like to show friends that such old software still works fine (even Shoutcast streaming works fine).
jamespo
2 days ago
Try running windows 11 on old CPUs, or machines without secure boot / TPM 2.0.
hackyhacky
2 days ago
> Try running windows 11 on old CPUs, or machines without secure boot / TPM 2.0.
The more relevant test is the reverse: running Windows XP and apps of that era on modern hardware. It will work perfectly. The same cannot be said of 2000-era Mac software.
lossyalgo
2 days ago
That's because TPM 2.0 module allows M$ to uniquely identify you and sell your info to advertisers - it's not an actual technical limitation, it's just because M$ is greedy, and it's a shame they aren't punished by governments for creating all this unnecessary eWaste just to make even more cash.
anthk
a day ago
With GNU/Linux and BSD I just recompile. I can run old C stuff from the 90's with few flags.
Under GNU/Linux, the VB6 counterpart would be TCL/Tk+SQlite, which would run nearly the same over almost 25-30 years.
As a plus, I can run my code with any editor and the TCL/Tk dependencies will straightly run on both XP, Mac, BSD and GNU/Linux with no propietary chains ever, or worse, that Visual Studio monstruosity. A simple editor will suffice and IronTCL weights less than 100MB and that even bundled with some tool, as BFG:
https://codeberg.org/luxferre/BFG
IronTCL:
https://www.irontcl.com/index.html
Good luck finding some VB5/6 runtime libraries out there without being a virii nest.
pjmlp
2 days ago
I suggest paying attention to some mac development podcasts.
steve1977
2 days ago
What would I learn there?
pjmlp
2 days ago
That development on macOS UI frameworks isn't as rosy.
steve1977
a day ago
I'm not saying it's perfect. Just that it's less of a mess than the situation on Windows.
pjmlp
a day ago
Again, listen to those podcasts, especially how Apple has (not) handled bug reports.
Between Carbon, Cocoa, UI Touch, UI Kit, Catalyst, Swift UI, there is plenty to chose from, with many non overlapping capabilities.
Then there is naturally the whole plethora of Kits, with several deprecated and replaced by others without feature parity,
steve1977
a day ago
Carbon is long deprecated and as mentioned was only ever meant as a transitional framework.
Cocoa still exists and is usable. UITouch is not a framework, but a class in UIKit. UIkit still exists and is usable. Same for Catalyst. Same for SwiftUI.
As said, I'm not pretending everything is sunshine and roses in Apple-Land. But at least Apple seems to mostly dogfood their own frameworks, which unfortunately doesn't seem to be the case anymore with Microsoft. WinUI 3 and WPF are supposed to be the "official" frameworks to use, but it seems Microsoft themselves are not using them consistently and they also don't seem to put a lot of resources behind them.
pjmlp
a day ago
Win32, MFC, Windows Forms, and WPF also exist and are quite usable.
Apple also doesn't always uses their stuff as they are supposed to, Webviews are used in a few "native" apps, some macOS apps are actually iOS ones ported via Catalyst, which is the reason they feel strange, and many other stuff I could list.
Two measures, two weights.
hackyhacky
2 days ago
> Ah yes, and the solution being presented is Linux, with Xlib, Motif, Qt, GTK
I'm not going to descend into a "my OS's API is worse than yours" pissing match with you, because it's pointless and tangential. The issue is not "is the Windows framework situation worse than Linux" but rather "is the Windows framework situation worse than it used to be" and the answer is emphatically yes, and due mostly to Ballmer's obsession with chasing shiny things, such as that brief period when he decided that all Windows must look like a phone.
hulitu
2 days ago
> Xlib, Motif, Qt, GTK,
Xlib and Motif are stable APIs. Qt and ... GTK on the other hand...
phillipcarter
2 days ago
Yeah, it sounds weird because the person you’re replying to is using examples of things that came in under Nadella, not Ballmer.
lysace
2 days ago
Feb 2014: Satya Nadella becomes CEO.
July 2014: Microsoft lays off 14k people, a large portion of which are SDET (Software Development Engineer in Test)/QA/test people.
The idea was that regular developers themselves would be writing and owning tests rather than relying on separate testers.
I'm sure there were multiple instances of insane empire building and lots of unproductivity, but it's also hard to not think this was where the downfall began.
3eb7988a1663
2 days ago
Ultimately it still comes down to someone in the chain giving a damn. There are obvious, surface level bugs across most technologies. Yet, developers, PMs, VPs all sign off and say, "Close enough".
lysace
2 days ago
And that's also on the CEO, especially after this much time.
He has failed to correctly incentivize/hire/motivate/plan/structure/etc.
conradfr
2 days ago
Does Satya Nadella even use a windows laptop?
lysace
2 days ago
Yes, probably.
Calavar
2 days ago
Danluu has a great piece on why Ballmer was better than people gave him credit for: https://danluu.com/ballmer/
zdragnar
2 days ago
You may also want to consider Cosmic. PopOS has consistently been the distro that "just works" for me, though I don't use it much as I prefer to tinker more. That said, they're doing a lot of good work making Cosmic as a better replacement for the ton of gnome 3 hacks they had to do before.
whywhywhywhy
19 hours ago
> Omarchy
Had high hopes for it but in my testing the mouse cursor chokes and drops frames/precision under load which I just can’t deal with.
doodlesdev
2 days ago
Why would you go for a random Linux distribution backed by DHH (a Ruby developer) instead of a established upstream distribution such as Debian or Fedora?
broof
2 days ago
I’m a user of omarchy and I like it a lot. I wanted a Linux experience that I didn’t have to set up myself, and this one was designed specifically for devs who are used to a macOS environment. It took about 6 minutes to set up and everything just works. I don’t really know that much about dhh or his politics, like some sibling comment mentioned. I just think it matches my sweet spot of ease to set up and provided good UX
epolanski
a day ago
As stated before, because my colleagues which whom I share the same projects and test cases made the jump from MacOS and are all liking it so far, I also like what I saw till now.
Fire-Dragon-DoL
2 days ago
Because of hyprland. There aren't many alternatives with hyprland (or niri) preconfigured for you
user205738
2 days ago
It's not such a difficult task to set up hyprland. And niri doesn't even need to be configured, the default configuration performs all the required tasks.
Fire-Dragon-DoL
a day ago
From my understanding, to get something at the level of omarchy you need to setup multiple pieces of software. In the end it has to replace the whole "desktop"
Cornbilly
2 days ago
It's just Arch Linux with hyprland pre-configured and bunch of pre-installed software.
People have been flocking to it for reasons like
1. They don't want to configure hyprland themselves.
2. They want to say they are running an "elite" distro like Arch.
3. They're part of DHH's weird following that is a mix of insufferable smugness and right-wing politics.
lolive
2 days ago
Utilities to circunvent the stupid original design. Even Microsoft is forced to use this pattern to correct itself. But hey, you know what they say: "Selling the disease and the cure is the best bizness plan ever".
jamespo
2 days ago
Try EndeavourOS
antisthenes
2 days ago
> I liked the path windows was going in late 2010s.
Surely there's a typo there, and you meant late 2000s, e.g. 2009?
Late 2010s Windows was W10 with constant system-breaking bugs, mobile-first interface, more and more data mining and adware my MS, etc.
spixy
a day ago
Windows 8/10 were more stable than XP/Vista.
Not sure what is bad with data mining / telemetry (as long it is anonymised and respects GDPR).
Adware is issue only on Windows 11.
throwaway-11-1
2 days ago
macOS is in the worst state I’ve ever experienced since I started using it, but I’d go back to a shitty performing x86 laptop with Linux before living on windows again. Just using it on my gaming pc makes my skin crawl