Norman Foster's steroidal new skyscraper is an affront to the New York skyline

14 pointsposted 13 hours ago
by PaulHoule

5 Comments

hanklazard

10 hours ago

What a strange article—it really goes out of its way to just try to insult every element of this building. It looks pretty incredible to me and I’m glad I live in a country where people push the boundaries of what can be built.

amenhotep

2 hours ago

Some of it's a matter of taste for sure but I found the repeated griping about how it tapers at ground level a truly bizarre complaint. Would he really prefer it if it took up its entire monolithic footprint to the total exclusion of pedestrians?

alimw

4 hours ago

The country doesn’t have much to do with it. Norman Forster travels all over.

hanklazard

19 minutes ago

Sure, I was just giving a different perspective. Congrats to Norman Foster for having such strong opinions about architecture, I also have an opinion and in this case it runs contrary to his.

johng

11 hours ago

I really have no comment about the amount of steel used but I definitely like the look and aesthetics of the building. I think its gorgeous.